Manuscript X-I-ST@1 · X-I-ST.tex · theorem · 9745fd40

Theorem: X-I-ST mathematical release

Release, significance, and what remains unconstructed · lines 2108–2163 · proof included or linked

X-I-ST@1#thm:release

Back to manuscript

Under the retained supported-host contract:

  1. is a specified classical relative BV Hamiltonian modulo , and in that ring;

  2. its new scalar Euler term is , with compact support;

  3. coefficients through order two agree with X-H-ST; the field free limit is exactly X-G-ST's , and the full free BV limit is exact in the centered sector;

  4. the off-shell background tadpole remains visible outside that centered sector;

  5. the chosen polynomial lift has the exact new residual , with the nonzero real evaluation (eq:positiveB);

  6. the natural interacting field rule still fails descent to the unchanged free equation quotient;

  7. the earlier three-tree coefficient packet is not changed through its retained order, and the specified positive reciprocity diagnostic remains positive;

  8. the independent convolution obstruction and the free fish/null-wavefront conditionals retain their separate scopes;

  9. every released finite supplied residual report has the complete instrument and finite-composition theorems proved above;

  10. scheduled locality and regular reference-preserving transport hold under the stated finite permissions.

These results form local Grade S.

They are not interacting quantum BRST, not a characteristic coefficient, not loop-anomaly cancellation, not an ultraviolet completion, and not a derived metric or spacetime emergence.

Proof. Theorem thm:deformation proves (i)–(ii). Corollary cor:recoverH, Proposition prop:freecausal, and Proposition prop:tadpole prove (iii)–(iv). Theorem thm:residual and Proposition prop:positiveB prove (v). Theorem thm:nondescent proves (vi). Propositions prop:trees and prop:reciprocity prove (vii). Section sec:diagnostics proves precisely the non-interference statements in (viii). Theorems thm:instrument and thm:composition, with Proposition prop:noacquisition, prove (ix). Theorems thm:locality and thm:route prove (x).

Nearby in this section