Manuscript XII-B@1 · XII-B.tex · section · 229bc869
B5: exclusions, the jet, and the classical ledger
B5: exclusions, the jet, and the classical ledger · lines 903–955
The following boundaries remain explicit.
X-track comparison. No X-E or X-F inverse, density switch, or mixed-tree prescription is imported. No field map is identified with . The reciprocity constraint mentioned in the production brief is a constraint on a proposed identification, not a permission to remove ramp derivatives from a new action.
The X-G manuscript is not among the supplied dependencies. Its numerical reciprocity witness is therefore not rederived or used as a premise of any theorem here.
original coupled jet. The original empty fixed-input Einstein jet is retained as the predecessor result for its original action, as cited by XI-B and XI-E. A new action requires its own coupled equation and conservation analysis.
The statement “no jet repair is claimed” in XII-A is not a decision about a model that XII-A never defines. This manuscript does not turn it into one. The changed jet is unresolved.
original ledger. The classical ledger belongs to the original XI-F response and its stated coefficient comparison. It is not recomputed here, not promoted to a quantum relation, and not used as the plateau law of an undefined changed response.
quantum constructions. No second graviton line, fish graph, triangle subtraction, , reflected residue, ghost loop, state, or expectation value is formed. No interacting differential, master equation, or interacting BRST class is claimed.
width. The ramp width remains throughout. No limiting argument is used to suppress the layer terms. Smoothness at fixed width does not identify the new model with a sharp insertion.
additional readout. No X-Enter record, cone token, conical current, or independent readout is assigned to the kernel. None is a premise of this audit.