All manuscripts

Manuscript XII-B@1 · XII-B.tex · 229bc869

Landmark XII-B Admission and one retarded response of the ramped cubic Einstein source, at fixed regulator width Handoff audit, variational consistency, and the unresolved release

Export XII-B.tex

Audits the XII-A handoff and separates source weighting from density weighting. The simply ramped cubic source fails the stated integrability test. The unresolved ending is a dependency stop, not a no-go for a correctly specified density weight. No compilation is asserted.

Front matter

  • abstractAbstractFront matter · lines 130–155
    Open as its own page

    This manuscript applies the stated stop rules to the proposed ramped-cubic construction. The supplied XII-A-v2 establishes a graded polynomial carrier, ordering transport, and an exclusion for the original cubic response. It does not provide the required changed-model freeze, its new Noether defect, or a decision about the changed coupled jet. The handoff gate therefore ends Unresolved, and no new cubic retarded response is defined.

    A separate consistency audit identifies a mathematical issue in the proposed specification. Multiplication of a cubic source by a ramp is not the same operation as multiplication of its Lagrangian density before variation. We derive the weighted Euler formula and compute the discrepancy explicitly on the pure-trace Einstein–Hilbert sector. It contains a nonzero ramp-derivative term. A mixed-second-variation test further shows that the simply weighted source cannot be the Euler derivative of an action on the unrestricted off-shell class.

    These results neither reopen XI-G nor obstruct a correctly specified density-ramped model. They identify the information and convention changes required before the completed-kernel, admission, response, and plateau gates can be evaluated. No state, loop, interacting differential, contact subtraction, or sharp-width limit is introduced.

  • figureSource weighting is not density weightingFront matter · XII-B@1#fig:scope-XII-B · lines 157–170
    Source weighting
    →
    Density weighting
    →
    The B0 stop
    The two weightings stay distinct. The B0 stop still applies.

    Source weighting is not density weighting. The three boxes name objects this manuscript keeps separate. The dashed box is the stated stop. Not a proof, and not an admission of a quantum coefficient.

  • figureSource weighting is not density weightingFront matter · XII-B@1#fig:split-XII-B · lines 172–183
    Source weighting
    The B0 stop
    The two weightings stay distinct. The B0 stop still applies.

    Source weighting is not density weighting. The boxes name objects this manuscript keeps separate. The dashed box is the stated stop. Not a proof, and not an admission of a quantum coefficient.

  • figureReading downward is not a transferFront matter · XII-B@1#fig:chain-XII-B · lines 185–198
    Source weighting
    ↓
    Density weighting
    ↓
    The B0 stop
    The two weightings stay distinct. The B0 stop still applies.

    Reading downward is not a transfer. The boxes name objects this manuscript keeps separate. The dashed box is the stated stop. Not a proof, and not an admission of a quantum coefficient.

  • figureSource weighting is not The B0 stopFront matter · XII-B@1#fig:pair-XII-B · lines 200–213
    Source weighting
    not the same object
    The B0 stop
    Density weighting. The two weightings stay distinct. The B0 stop still applies.

    Source weighting is not The B0 stop. The boxes name objects this manuscript keeps separate. The dashed box is the stated stop. Not a proof, and not an admission of a quantum coefficient.

  • figureThree statuses stay separateFront matter · XII-B@1#fig:gate-XII-B · lines 215–228
    Named: Source weighting
    →
    Used here: Density weighting
    →
    Not claimed: The B0 stop
    The two weightings stay distinct. The B0 stop still applies.

    Three statuses stay separate. The boxes name objects this manuscript keeps separate. The dashed box is the stated stop. Not a proof, and not an admission of a quantum coefficient.

  • sectionFront matterFront matter · lines 228–237
    Open as its own page

    Figure fig:split-XII-B records one view of the same separation. Figure fig:chain-XII-B records one view of the same separation. Figure fig:pair-XII-B records one view of the same separation. Figure fig:gate-XII-B records one view of the same separation. The drawings add no hypothesis.

    Figure fig:scope-XII-B records that separation. The drawing adds no hypothesis.

  • scopeRelease: the B0 stop rule appliesFront matter · lines 238–258
    Open as its own page

    : the B0 stop rule applies{ Constructed here: the handoff audit; the distinction between source weighting and density weighting; the weighted Euler identity; an explicit Einstein–Hilbert layer discrepancy; and a variational integrability test.

    Overall ending: Unresolved. The supplied XII-A-v2 does not contain the changed-model handoff required by the production specification. Accordingly this manuscript does not define the new cubic retarded response and does not claim B1–B4 constructed.

    Not inferred: a forbidden wavefront tuple for a correctly specified new insertion, a plateau obstruction for that insertion, or nonexistence of a density-ramped model.

    XI-G's original class obstruction remains closed. Missing handoff data are not a physical no-go theorem.}

The three endings and the non-reopening rule

  • sectionThe three endings and the non-reopening ruleThe three endings and the non-reopening rule · lines 264–301
    Open as its own page

    The intended affirmative target is admission of a scalar-completed, ramped cubic Einstein insertion and construction of one classical retarded response with a proved plateau law. The three endings are retained:

    1. Constructed: the changed model is frozen, its completed kernel is microcausal, the named response is defined on its stated domain, and its plateau identity is proved.

    2. Proved obstructed: a forbidden tuple is exhibited for the named completed kernel, or a nonzero interior defect is proved for the named plateau identity.

    3. Unresolved: the prerequisite model, completed kernel, or response map has not been specified sufficiently to prove either alternative.

    The production specification contains an additional dependency rule: XII-B consumes the changed-model freeze from XII-A; it does not supply that freeze itself. If the required XII-A statements are absent, XII-B stops and does not write the new response formula. That rule governs the present release.

    XI-G proves, for its detected observation classes, that the original free-shell cubic class has no representative in XIG. The inherited split null covectors are part of that predecessor result. Nothing below searches for another representative of the original .

    A changed source would be a different model. Its admission cannot be deduced merely by negating the original obstruction, and its plateau law cannot be obtained by relabeling the original response. Likewise, absence of a new construction does not extend XI-G's obstruction to every possible changed model.

B0: audit of the supplied XII-A handoff

  • sectionB0: audit of the supplied XII-A handoffB0: audit of the supplied XII-A handoff · lines 303–321
    Open as its own page

    The supplied predecessor is XII-A-v2.tex, cited here as XII-A XIIA. Its actual release is a polynomial-carrier construction for the frozen XI-track multiplet. It includes:

    • the separation of equation geometry from action normalization;

    • a regular quantum presentation and a shell quotient;

    • a smoothing-based descent argument;

    • ordering transport and the named composite sector;

    • delimited continuity statements;

    • robustness of the detected observation class;

    • a regular ambient–slab identification.

    These are relevant algebraic prerequisites. They are not a definition of a new cubic action.

  • sectionThe required sentences and their actual statusB0: audit of the supplied XII-A handoff › The required sentences and their actual status · lines 322–367
    Open as its own page

    The production specification requires the following handoff. We distinguish requirements from statements actually supplied.

    Required XII-A statementSupplied status
    H1The cubic model is changed before response formation, with a specified ramped density and its actual Euler source.Not supplied. XII-A retains the frozen XI-F/XI-G cubic functional.
    H2The inverse remains , with no X-track rescaling.Supplied at the free normalization level.
    H3The changed cubic Noether identity and all ramp-derivative terms are displayed.Not supplied for a changed cubic density.
    H4The new map is not identified with the X-track source-switched mixed map.No new cubic map is defined, so the required changed-model comparison is not supplied.
    H5The effect, if any, of the changed density on the fixed-input coupled jet is stated and justified.Not supplied. A disclaimer of jet repair is not a calculation for a new action.

    In particular, XII-A's exclusion section identifies its as the frozen XI-F/XI-G functional. It does not replace that functional by a density-ramped one. Its declarations and proof ledger do not contain a changed cubic Noether theorem.

    The normalization requirement H2 passes. The conjunction H1–H5 does not.

  • theoremTheorem: B0 auditB0: audit of the supplied XII-A handoff › The required sentences and their actual status · XII-B@1#thm:B0 · proof attached · lines 368–386
    Open as its own page

    Relative to the supplied XII-A-v2 and the stated production stop rule, the changed-model handoff is incomplete. Gate B0 ends Unresolved. Consequently no new cubic retarded response, completed-kernel admission, or plateau theorem is released in this manuscript.

    Proof. An affirmative B0 ending requires all the changed-model obligations, not only the inherited free inverse. The supplied text contains neither the changed density/source freeze nor its new Noether identity and coupled-jet decision. The production rule explicitly makes these omissions a stop. Thus the dependent construction is not authorized. This is a dependency conclusion, not a wavefront or plateau nonexistence argument.

  • sectionThe required sentences and their actual statusB0: audit of the supplied XII-A handoff › The required sentences and their actual status · lines 386–394
    Open as its own page

    The proposed handoff also requires a mathematical clarification before it can be supplied consistently: its phrases “multiply the source” and “multiply the density before variation” do not specify the same operation. Sections sec:weighted–sec:trace prove this point.

Inherited sheet and the absent changed object

  • sectionInherited sheet and the absent changed objectInherited sheet and the absent changed object · lines 396–471
    Open as its own page

    The inherited geometry is

    Fix and

    The ramp is the one supplied in XI-B and XI-E:

    It is smooth and flat at both endpoints. Moreover for . Indeed, on ,

    The switch and plateau satisfy

    This class is not reduced after the audit.

    Trace reversal and the differential normalization are

    Parentheses include . The equation inverse and action inverse remain distinct as in XI-B XIB. The factor is not imported.

    The original cubic source is

    with the curvature convention and Einstein–Hilbert action

    These data specify the original local coefficient, not its new weighted variational completion.

    The scalar completion and the coordinate ramp are those of XI-E XIE. The new completed insertion would need both its scalar-response leg and its coordinate leg. Neither is discarded merely because a local metric source has a smooth weight. No completed new kernel is defined here, because B0 has stopped.

Density weighting is not source weighting

  • sectionDensity weighting is not source weightingDensity weighting is not source weighting · lines 473–478
    Open as its own page

    This section is a variational consistency calculation, not a construction of the prohibited new retarded response.

  • sectionA local Euler conventionDensity weighting is not source weighting › A local Euler convention · XII-B@1#eq:Euler · lines 479–506
    Open as its own page

    Let denote finitely many even field components, and let be a local density of finite jet order. For a multi-index , write

    Total derivatives act on local jet expressions; when applied to a function of alone, they are ordinary derivatives.

    Compact variations define the Euler expression

    Thus

    for compact variations. This is the ordinary local variational calculus; see also KO. No global convergence of an unlocalized action on arbitrary configurations is needed.

  • lemmaLemma: Weighted Euler expressionDensity weighting is not source weighting › A local Euler convention · XII-B@1#lem:weighted, XII-B@1#eq:weightedEuler, XII-B@1#eq:layerEuler · proof attached · lines 507–543
    Open as its own page

    For a fixed smooth scalar function ,

    where

    For a time-dependent ramp, all terms in contain a positive-order time derivative of .

    Proof. Since is independent of the field jets,

    Apply the multi-index Leibniz rule to every term of (eq:Euler). The terms with give . The others give (eq:layerEuler). Spatial derivatives of a time-only weight vanish.

  • sectionA local Euler conventionDensity weighting is not source weighting › A local Euler convention · XII-B@1#eq:firstorderlayer · lines 543–559
    Open as its own page

    For a first-order density this becomes

    For a second-order density, first and second derivatives of the ramp may occur.

    With the fixed , these layer terms vanish outside the closed layer and are smooth and flat at its endpoints. Their nonzero values lie in . They are not sharp-surface distributions.

  • sectionTwo different specificationsDensity weighting is not source weighting › Two different specifications · lines 560–580
    Open as its own page

    Let be a cubic density normalized so that . There are then two distinct prescriptions:

    1. Source weighting: prescribe the local expression as the new forcing term.

    2. Density weighting: prescribe before variation, whose Euler expression is .

    The production sheet asks for a density-ramped vertex but also writes a response driven only by . That combination needs justification; it is not a consequence of multiplication by a smooth ramp.

    The next section shows that the omitted term is genuinely nonzero for the displayed Einstein–Hilbert convention. It is not merely a possible correction for unrelated models.

  • lemmaLemma: Boundary representatives matter after weightingDensity weighting is not source weighting › Two different specifications · XII-B@1#lem:boundary, XII-B@1#eq:boundaryrepresentative · proof attached · lines 581–603
    Open as its own page

    If , then

    but

    Proof. Euler variation annihilates a total divergence under compact variations. Use

    and apply that fact.

  • sectionTwo different specificationsDensity weighting is not source weighting › Two different specifications · lines 603–611
    Open as its own page

    Thus an unweighted source alone does not identify a density-ramped vertex. A density representative, or an explicit boundary convention giving the same information, must be named. A silent integration by parts after the ramp is introduced can change the model.

An explicit Einstein–Hilbert layer discrepancy

  • sectionAn explicit Einstein–Hilbert layer discrepancyAn explicit Einstein–Hilbert layer discrepancy · lines 613–619
    Open as its own page

    The following calculation uses the pure-trace sector already displayed in XI-G, but concerns density variation rather than XI-G's plane-wave obstruction.

  • sectionThe cubic density on the pure-trace sectorAn explicit Einstein–Hilbert layer discrepancy › The cubic density on the pure-trace sector · lines 620–630
    Open as its own page

    Set

    All expressions are formal near .

  • lemmaLemma: Pure-trace cubic densityAn explicit Einstein–Hilbert layer discrepancy › The cubic density on the pure-trace sector · XII-B@1#lem:tracedensity, XII-B@1#eq:tracedensity, XII-B@1#eq:traceEuler · proof attached · lines 631–681
    Open as its own page

    For the displayed Einstein–Hilbert density, its coefficient of on this sector is

    Its Euler derivative is

    Proof. Computing the Christoffel symbols of gives

    With , this is

    Therefore the signed density is exactly

    Its coefficient of is (eq:tracedensity).

    Direct variation gives

    Variation along contracts the full cubic Euler source with , proving the last equality. It agrees with the pure-trace coefficient in XI-G XIG.

  • propositionProposition: Nonzero layer termAn explicit Einstein–Hilbert layer discrepancy › The cubic density on the pure-trace sector · XII-B@1#prop:tracelayer, XII-B@1#eq:tracelayer · proof attached · lines 683–710
    Open as its own page

    Density weighting gives

    The second term is not identically zero on the unrestricted off-shell configuration class.

    Proof. Apply (eq:firstorderlayer) to (eq:tracedensity). To detect the discrepancy, choose a spacetime box with and a smooth equal to near that box. Let be a nonzero compact variation supported inside it. The discrepancy pairing is

    The strict sign follows from and there. All variations are compact and supported away from the layer endpoints, so no boundary convention enters this pairing.

  • sectionThe cubic density on the pure-trace sectorAn explicit Einstein–Hilbert layer discrepancy › The cubic density on the pure-trace sector · lines 710–717
    Open as its own page

    This is a defect in the identification of the proposed vertex source, not a computed B4 plateau defect. The test is a compact metric variation used to audit an Euler derivative; it is not a replacement for the stipulated plateau parameter class .

  • sectionSimply weighting the source is not variationalAn explicit Einstein–Hilbert layer discrepancy › Simply weighting the source is not variational · lines 718–722
    Open as its own page

    The preceding discrepancy is stronger than the failure of one chosen density representative.

  • propositionProposition: Off-shell variational integrabilityAn explicit Einstein–Hilbert layer discrepancy › Simply weighting the source is not variational · XII-B@1#prop:integrability, XII-B@1#eq:Hessianantisymmetry · proof attached · lines 723–773
    Open as its own page

    For nonconstant , the full source cannot be the Euler derivative of a twice differentiable action on an off-shell neighborhood containing the unrestricted pure-trace configurations and compact metric variations.

    Proof. If such an action existed, restrict it to . Its first derivative would be

    Symmetry of mixed second variations requires

    for every pair of compact variations .

    Choose on a neighborhood of their supports. There

    Compact integration by parts gives

    Take a nonzero real supported strictly inside the layer and put . Both variations are compact, and

    Since the ramp depends only on time, (eq:Hessianantisymmetry) equals

    This contradicts symmetry of the Hessian.

  • sectionSimply weighting the source is not variationalAn explicit Einstein–Hilbert layer discrepancy › Simply weighting the source is not variational · lines 773–788
    Open as its own page

    Consequently the simultaneous demands “an action vertex varied before response” and “Euler source exactly on unrestricted off-shell tests” are not interchangeable specifications. Adding an unnoticed total divergence cannot evade Proposition prop:integrability.

    A source-weighted forcing prescription may still be considered as a nonvariational model. A density-ramped action may also be considered, with its actual layer terms included. Neither possibility is ruled out. Choosing between them, and freezing the relevant identities, is outside this stopped construction.

Dependent gates: what is not established

  • sectionB1: the completed kernelDependent gates: what is not established › B1: the completed kernel · lines 793–822
    Open as its own page

    The relevant comparison criterion from XI-G is

    Its role is comparison after a new compact kernel has been defined. It does not define that kernel.

    For a corrected density-ramped model, the completed kernel must include:

    1. both metric slots of the actual cubic Euler source, including its ramp-derivative terms;

    2. the metric retarded leg with the XI-track normalization;

    3. the coordinate leg with its own divergence-form ramp;

    4. the scalar-response part of , including the switch and massive advanced scalar leg after transposition;

    5. every support and properness condition used in the composition.

    Checking only a smooth weight on the local metric diagonal would leave the scalar completion untested.

    No new or is defined here. Accordingly no wavefront inclusion, admission criterion evaluation, or forbidden tuple for that new object is asserted.

  • sectionB2: admission and the old algebraDependent gates: what is not established › B2: admission and the old algebra · lines 823–839
    Open as its own page

    XII-A supplies an inherited regular-algebra embedding into its named polynomial shell carrier:

    This is the old embedding, not admission of an unnamed new functional. Its Hadamard matrix is product data, not a selected state.

    The existence of the old carrier does not decide which changed cubic action is being used. Nor does it imply membership of the completed insertion before B1 is discharged. Thus B2 has an available carrier prerequisite but no new admission conclusion.

  • sectionB3: a response functional is not a test functionDependent gates: what is not established › B3: a response functional is not a test function · lines 840–871
    Open as its own page

    There is also a type issue to resolve in a future B3 statement. For the original quadratic insertion , its metric derivative at a smooth scalar configuration is a linear covector in the metric slot, with scalar field degree one. A cubic vertex has a quadratic Euler source in the metric.

    Their single rooted contraction is therefore a scalar-valued functional of field degree , not an element of . This agrees with the distinction between classical response functionals and their functional derivative kernels FR.

    A smooth compact test can instead be an intermediate rooted coefficient after fixing the smooth fields and transposing the propagator, possibly with source localization. Those are different types. A complete B3 theorem must state:

    • the domain of fields and external tests;

    • whether its codomain is a test space, a polynomial functional space, or a continuous dual pairing;

    • which intermediate coefficient is claimed compact;

    • the exact support statement for that coefficient.

    This observation does not prove that the eventual map leaves a test space. The map and test-space identification are not yet fixed. Under the B0 stop rule, no new cubic retarded formula is supplied to fill that gap.

  • sectionB4: local layer support is not a plateau cancellationDependent gates: what is not established › B4: local layer support is not a plateau cancellation · lines 872–901
    Open as its own page

    If a correctly specified cubic density has a layer correction, that correction is locally supported where derivatives of are nonzero. Retarded propagation of a layer-supported source need not be layer-supported, as the explicit XI-B layer diagnostics show XIB.

    Consequently a support statement about a local Noether breaking term is not, by itself, a theorem that its completed response vanishes on the plateau. Conversely, compact plateau parameters do not justify discarding a term before its variation and propagation have been calculated.

    The stipulated class remains . No contact term is selected, no layer term is deleted, and this class is not shrunk. No new B4 variation has been computed because the new vertex has not passed B0.

    The nonzero pairing in Proposition prop:tracelayer is not relabeled as a nonzero plateau pairing. It establishes a source-definition mismatch only. Ending Proved obstructed for B4 would require a separate, correctly typed interior witness for the actual completed new response.

B5: exclusions, the jet, and the classical ledger

  • sectionB5: exclusions, the jet, and the classical ledgerB5: exclusions, the jet, and the classical ledger · lines 903–955
    Open as its own page

    The following boundaries remain explicit.

    X-track comparison. No X-E or X-F inverse, density switch, or mixed-tree prescription is imported. No field map is identified with . The reciprocity constraint mentioned in the production brief is a constraint on a proposed identification, not a permission to remove ramp derivatives from a new action.

    The X-G manuscript is not among the supplied dependencies. Its numerical reciprocity witness is therefore not rederived or used as a premise of any theorem here.

    original coupled jet. The original empty fixed-input Einstein jet is retained as the predecessor result for its original action, as cited by XI-B and XI-E. A new action requires its own coupled equation and conservation analysis.

    The statement “no jet repair is claimed” in XII-A is not a decision about a model that XII-A never defines. This manuscript does not turn it into one. The changed jet is unresolved.

    original ledger. The classical ledger belongs to the original XI-F response and its stated coefficient comparison. It is not recomputed here, not promoted to a quantum relation, and not used as the plateau law of an undefined changed response.

    quantum constructions. No second graviton line, fish graph, triangle subtraction, , reflected residue, ghost loop, state, or expectation value is formed. No interacting differential, master equation, or interacting BRST class is claimed.

    width. The ramp width remains throughout. No limiting argument is used to suppress the layer terms. Smoothness at fixed width does not identify the new model with a sharp insertion.

    additional readout. No X-Enter record, cone token, conical current, or independent readout is assigned to the kernel. None is a premise of this audit.

Decision table and exact handoff

  • sectionDecision table and exact handoffDecision table and exact handoff · lines 957–989
    Open as its own page
    GateEndingExact reason
    B0UnresolvedThe supplied XII-A-v2 does not freeze the changed cubic density, its actual Euler source, new Noether identity, and changed-jet status.
    B1UnresolvedThe completed new three-slot kernel is not defined; no wavefront verdict is inferred from a local weight.
    B2UnresolvedThe inherited carrier and regular embedding are available, but the new insertion has no admission proof.
    B3UnresolvedNo new vertex response is defined; the functional/test codomain distinction also needs specification.
    B4UnresolvedNo new completed variation or plateau witness is evaluated. The layer discrepancy proved here is not a plateau verdict.
    B5RecordedNon-identifications and exclusions are explicit; no loop, state, interacting differential, or sharp limit is introduced.
  • theoremTheorem: Final releaseDecision table and exact handoff · XII-B@1#thm:final · proof attached · lines 990–1014
    Open as its own page

    For the supplied dependency set, the requested affirmative XII-B release is not established. Its ending is Unresolved at B0, with the dependent gates left unresolved.

    The audit additionally proves that a density-ramped cubic Einstein action and a forcing prescription whose source is exactly are different specifications on the unrestricted off-shell class. This does not obstruct a correctly defined new action or a separately defined source-weighted model.

    Proof. The B0 conclusion is Theorem thm:B0. The distinction is Lemma lem:weighted, Proposition prop:tracelayer, and Proposition prop:integrability. No theorem here exhibits a forbidden completed-kernel tuple or an interior defect of a specified new plateau identity. Therefore neither of the stated grounds for a new Proved obstructed release has been established.

  • sectionWhat must be supplied before the construction resumesDecision table and exact handoff › What must be supplied before the construction resumes · lines 1016–1039
    Open as its own page

    A consistent updated handoff must:

    1. choose a density-ramped action or an independently source-weighted forcing prescription;

    2. if it chooses an action, name the cubic density representative and retain its actual Euler source, including the terms generated by differentiating the ramp;

    3. keep the XI-track free inverse and state exactly which quadratic and lower-order coefficients remain unchanged;

    4. derive the changed Noether identity before propagating or completing it;

    5. state the changed coupled-jet conclusion, or amend the handoff contract to permit that question to remain unresolved;

    6. define the full scalar-completed insertion;

    7. specify the response codomain and the intermediate compact test to which its support theorem applies.

    These are missing data, not a newly supplied freeze. They must not be inserted retroactively into XII-A while continuing to cite the old version as if it contained them.

  • sectionWhat XII-C does and does not receiveDecision table and exact handoff › What XII-C does and does not receive · lines 1040–1048
    Open as its own page

    At this stage XII-C receives an audit and the exact variational consistency calculations. It does not receive an admitted ramped insertion, a new retarded response, or a proved new plateau law. Opening those objects remains conditional on a corrected handoff and completion of B1–B4.

  • sectionConclusionDecision table and exact handoff › Conclusion · lines 1049–1069
    Open as its own page

    The old XI-G question stays closed. The density/source mismatch is displayed rather than hidden. No new response is written before its prerequisites are supplied.

Declarations

  • sectionDeclarationsDeclarations · lines 1070–1101
    Open as its own page

    scope. The proofs given here concern the dependency audit, local Euler variation, the explicit pure-trace Einstein–Hilbert coefficient, and variational integrability. They do not constitute the proposed admission and retarded response construction.

    scope. XI-B, XI-E, XI-G, and XII-A-v2 are used in their supplied forms. Their inherited statements are distinguished from the calculations proved here. The changed-model freeze is not attributed to a predecessor that does not contain it.

    -go scope. The integrability result concerns the source as an Euler derivative on the unrestricted off-shell class. It is not a no-go for density-ramped actions with their actual layer terms, nonvariational forcing prescriptions, larger algebras, or future admission constructions.

    . No successful pdflatex execution, proof-assistant check, independent referee review, or journal acceptance is asserted. The source uses standard theorem environments and defines all internal reference targets.

  • bibliographyReferencesDeclarations · lines 1102–1161
    Open as its own page

    XIIA

    N. Cheung, Landmark XII-A: One graded polynomial carrier for the finite-ramp multiplet, with ordering-stable composites and a robust observation exclusion. Supplied manuscript XII-A-v2.tex. Used for the actual carrier handoff and the B0 audit.

    XIB

    N. Cheung, Landmark XI-B: The free de Donder multiplet for the ramp Einstein–scalar sheet: causal propagators, residual gauge, and the layer dressing. Supplied manuscript XI-B.tex. Used for the free inverse, ghost normalization, plateau class, ramp, and distinction between layer source support and propagated support.

    XIE

    N. Cheung, Landmark XI-E: On-shell admission of the fixed-width tree, a localized first-order identity, and the held-fixed defect. Supplied manuscript XI-E.tex. Used for the scalar completion, coordinate prescription, polynomial carrier, and distinction between product data and a state.

    XIG

    N. Cheung, Landmark XI-G: The free-shell class of the cubic Einstein kernel: the onset covector is inherited by every representative. Supplied manuscript XI-G.tex. Used for the closed original obstruction, the class criterion, and comparison with the pure-trace cubic coefficient. Its plane-wave proof is not repeated.

    KO

    I. A. Kogan and P. J. Olver, “Invariant Euler–Lagrange equations and the invariant variational bicomplex,” Acta Applicandae Mathematicae 76 (2003), 137–193. Background for local Euler operators and variational integration by parts. The weighted identities used here are proved explicitly.

    FR

    K. Fredenhagen and K. Rejzner, Perturbative algebraic quantum field theory, arXiv:1208.1428. Background for the distinction between classical response functionals, functional derivative kernels, and test functions. No quantum retarded product is imported.