Manuscript XVI-K@1 · XVI-K.tex · proposition · aa7553bb

Proposition: Extension, moments, and basis independence

A coherent extension map on the finite span › Definition and coherence · lines 1283–1351 · proof included or linked

XVI-K@1#prop:RK, XVI-K@1#eq:moments, XVI-K@1#eq:coherence, XVI-K@1#eq:Jextension

Back to manuscript

The map is linear, well defined, and satisfies

For ,

These conditions determine the extension uniquely.

Every constant-coefficient relation among the punctured kernels is preserved:

In particular, the extended version of (eq:trace) is zero.

Finally,

the selected square extension of XVI-J, with the same , order-zero projection, and zero moment.

Proof. Lemma lem:vanishing and the continuous projection give a continuous distributional action, linear in . Tests supported away from zero have zero Taylor jet and recover the punctured distribution. The direct grading makes the definition on unambiguous.

The construction is the zero-moment point extension with projection (eq:Wrho); the scaling bound follows from BF (Theorem 5.3 and equations (38)–(39)). The moments hold because . For a nonzero , its restriction already has scaling degree , so the extension has degree exactly . For , the selected extension is zero.

Differences of extensions with the stated bound are point-supported distributions

Pairing with the dual Taylor tests makes all their coefficients zero if the moments agree, proving uniqueness. Linearity proves (eq:coherence), independently of any basis chosen to compute the finite span.

For , the data are exactly (eq:W0) and . Uniqueness at scaling degree four therefore proves (eq:Jextension) on all of .

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • XVI-K@1#eq:moments · line 1291

  • XVI-K@1#eq:coherence · line 1302

  • XVI-K@1#eq:Jextension · line 1312

  • unlabeled · line 1287

  • unlabeled · line 1338

Nearby in this section