Manuscript En04-A@1 · En04-A.tex · section · bab77211
Even bipartite non-local magic need not cause response
Stabilizer structure and why the proposed implication fails › Even bipartite non-local magic need not cause response · lines 918–922
This standard stabilizer structure is also discussed in FattalEtAl; the needed statement is proved above.
Nearby in this section
- section: Even bipartite non-local magic need not cause response
- lemma: Lemma: Stabilizer reductions have flat nonzero spectra
- theorem: Theorem: A constant complement can contain non-local magic
- section: Even bipartite non-local magic need not cause response
- corollary: Corollary: No unconditional magic-to-leakage implication