Manuscript En04-A@1 · En04-A.tex · section · bab77211
Even bipartite non-local magic need not cause response
Stabilizer structure and why the proposed implication fails › Even bipartite non-local magic need not cause response · lines 972–998
For the two-qubit syndrome, the indicator can be evaluated:
Indeed, the largest overlap with a product state is , whereas the largest overlap with a maximally entangled two-qubit state is . These are the two possible Schmidt spectra of a two-qubit pure stabilizer state. Both overlaps are strictly below one for .
This counterexample concerns bipartite non-local magic, including in a complete Choi state. It does not identify that quantity with the specialized perturbative tripartite quantity of CaoEtAl2026. The fixed syndrome carries no logical-input response.
Displayed formulas in this passage
unlabeled · line 975
Nearby in this section
- section: Even bipartite non-local magic need not cause response
- lemma: Lemma: Stabilizer reductions have flat nonzero spectra
- section: Even bipartite non-local magic need not cause response
- theorem: Theorem: A constant complement can contain non-local magic
- corollary: Corollary: No unconditional magic-to-leakage implication