Manuscript En04-A@1 · En04-A.tex · theorem · bab77211
Theorem: A constant complement can contain non-local magic
Stabilizer structure and why the proposed implication fails › Even bipartite non-local magic need not cause response · lines 923–972 · proof included or linked
En04-A@1#thm:NLcounterexample
Let , and prepare the fixed syndrome
Define
Then
so .
Nevertheless,
and the complete encoding Choi state has
Proof. Tracing gives the displayed replacement channel. Discarding and returning recovers the code exactly.
The two nonzero eigenvalues of the -reduction are unequal. Local unitaries preserve them, whereas a pure stabilizer reduction must have a flat nonzero spectrum by Lemma lem:flat. Thus no local unitaries convert to a stabilizer state. The local unitary groups are compact and the stabilizer set is finite, so the minimum distance is strictly positive.
The Choi state is . For the Choi magic statement, take a qubit code, or more generally , with its fixed qubit structure. Across , its -reduction has the same two unequal eigenvalues. The same argument applies.
Displayed formulas in this passage
unlabeled · line 926
unlabeled · line 932
unlabeled · line 939
unlabeled · line 946
unlabeled · line 950
Nearby in this section
- section: Even bipartite non-local magic need not cause response
- lemma: Lemma: Stabilizer reductions have flat nonzero spectra
- section: Even bipartite non-local magic need not cause response
- section: Even bipartite non-local magic need not cause response
- corollary: Corollary: No unconditional magic-to-leakage implication