Manuscript X-L-ST@1 · X-L-ST.tex · corollary · 20a32a22
Corollary: Semiclassically normalized quantum descent is not automatic
An explicit obstruction to unchanged free-shell descent · lines 1109–1126 · proof included or linked
X-L-ST@1#cor:quantumobstruction
Suppose a proposed differential on an unchanged free quantum carrier is required to have the displayed nonlinear scalar rule as its classical normalization, including the compact equation functional . If its classical reduction preserves the unchanged free equations, such a proposal is incompatible with (eq:witness).
Proof. A well-defined differential sends the zero equation class to zero. Its assumed classical reduction would therefore make vanish on every free solution. Equation (eq:witness) contradicts that requirement.
Nearby in this section
- section: An explicit obstruction to unchanged free-shell descent
- theorem: Theorem: Compactly tested nonlinear non-descent
- remark: Remark: Compact test, not a compact spacetime wave
- corollary: Corollary: Equation-vanishing changes cannot repair this witness
- section: An explicit obstruction to unchanged free-shell descent
- section: An explicit obstruction to unchanged free-shell descent
- proposition: Proposition: Compact relative ghosts are not unrestricted free ghosts
- section: An explicit obstruction to unchanged free-shell descent