Manuscript XIX-A@1 · XIX-A.tex · lemma · e30d8062

Lemma: First rod variations

Second refusal: original rods are not modified rods › A detecting compact perturbation · lines 840–883 · proof included or linked

XIX-A@1#lem:rod-first, XIX-A@1#eq:rod-first

Back to manuscript

On (eq:scalar-metric),

Thus original and modified rods are not identical functional prescriptions.

Proof. On an original clock slice,

Expanding gives

The first harmonic equation is , which proves the first formula.

A modified slice through background time has embedding

because . Its induced spatial metric at first order is

The contribution involving starts at order ; the lapse perturbation therefore does not alter this first-order calculation. The modified harmonic equation is with decaying boundary data, so . For any such that is nonzero, the prescriptions differ.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • XIX-A@1#eq:rod-first · line 843

  • unlabeled · line 853

  • unlabeled · line 860

  • unlabeled · line 867

  • unlabeled · line 871

Nearby in this section