Manuscript XIX-A@1 · XIX-A.tex · theorem · e30d8062

Theorem: Original and modified rods change the quadratic lapse

Second refusal: original rods are not modified rods › A detecting compact perturbation · lines 885–931 · proof included or linked

XIX-A@1#thm:rod-detection, XIX-A@1#eq:rod-witness, XIX-A@1#eq:rod-lapse-difference

Back to manuscript

Let be nonconstant and let be a smooth time bump supported strictly inside the comparison interval. In (eq:scalar-metric), choose

Let and be the second coefficients of the relational lapse using original and modified rods, respectively, with the same clock . Then

The difference is detected by a nonnegative compact spacetime test. Hence the quadratic relational lapse depends on the rod choice.

Proof. Since for compact , Lemma lem:rod-first gives

There is no clock perturbation, so . For (eq:scalar-metric), the raw lapse is

and therefore

The local raw second coefficient is the same for the two rod choices. Proposition prop:lapse-composition consequently gives

Choose a nonnegative test supported where and , positive on a nonempty open subset. Its pairing with the displayed difference is strictly negative.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • XIX-A@1#eq:rod-witness · line 890

  • XIX-A@1#eq:rod-lapse-difference · line 897

  • unlabeled · line 909

  • unlabeled · line 914

  • unlabeled · line 918

  • unlabeled · line 923

Nearby in this section