Manuscript XIX-A@1 · XIX-A.tex · theorem · e30d8062
Theorem: Original and modified rods change the quadratic lapse
Second refusal: original rods are not modified rods › A detecting compact perturbation · lines 885–931 · proof included or linked
XIX-A@1#thm:rod-detection, XIX-A@1#eq:rod-witness, XIX-A@1#eq:rod-lapse-difference
Let be nonconstant and let be a smooth time bump supported strictly inside the comparison interval. In (eq:scalar-metric), choose
Let and be the second coefficients of the relational lapse using original and modified rods, respectively, with the same clock . Then
The difference is detected by a nonnegative compact spacetime test. Hence the quadratic relational lapse depends on the rod choice.
Proof. Since for compact , Lemma lem:rod-first gives
There is no clock perturbation, so . For (eq:scalar-metric), the raw lapse is
and therefore
The local raw second coefficient is the same for the two rod choices. Proposition prop:lapse-composition consequently gives
Choose a nonnegative test supported where and , positive on a nonempty open subset. Its pairing with the displayed difference is strictly negative.
Displayed formulas in this passage
XIX-A@1#eq:rod-witness · line 890
XIX-A@1#eq:rod-lapse-difference · line 897
unlabeled · line 909
unlabeled · line 914
unlabeled · line 918
unlabeled · line 923