Manuscript III@2 · III.tex · 82dad3e5
Descent of first-order relational scalars and the free-product obstruction Classical equation spaces, retarded sections, and compact Ward observables
Specifies version 2 of the classical descent manuscript. Four equation-space questions stay separate. The second row does not define a quotient for general compact gauge parameters. Failure of descent is proved for one exhibited Poisson symbol, not for every scalar functional. thm:Killing says general compact scalar Lie derivatives are not tangent to the unchanged massive free shell; the preserving fields are exactly Killing fields. That tangency theorem is not the unchanged-product obstruction. thm:jet-descent retains the forced correction and supplies a past-trivial retarded section. thm:reduced-Cauchy is a Hausdorff well-posed C1 quotient. The C1 metric equation is vacuum linearized gravity; the stress of the background scalar is not inserted, and C1 is not the full Einstein-scalar linearization. thm:compact-pair constructs a nonzero compact coupled Ward pair. An adjoint-exact compact repair can vanish without every compact coupled Ward observable vanishing. Newton reconstruction in the closed-range argument is a membership test, not admission of noncompact gauge descriptors. A gauge-fixed response need not solve the invariant equations, and it is not asserted that it never can. The sourced successor is split into S1 invariant equations, S2 a gauge-fixed forced response, and S3 quotient descent. None of those sourced constructions is completed. Companion manuscripts are documentary comparisons and are not premises. This is not a derivation of a cognitive construct, not holographic identification, not a Page curve, and not spacetime emergence. The inherited full characteristic map is not constructed. Full spacetime emergence is not constructed. O.1 stays NOT_CLOSED. The series Route B is not discharged. XVI-N is not discharged. XV-B is not opened. XVI-P is registered and is not a premise. H2, I3, and J2 stay unresolved. No quantum coefficient is admitted. No compilation is asserted. The source has not been compiled. No machine-checked proof is claimed. Numerical execution is not asserted. Independent execution is not asserted.
Front matter
abstractAbstractFront matter · lines 152–176
Open as its own pageWe identify the classical equation spaces and gauge actions on which specified first-order relational scalar functionals descend. An exhibited Poisson-dressed symbol is not constant on the unchanged free product of linearized gravity with a massive scalar; the same two-representative gap survives spatial Fourier regularization. Moving the scalar does not repair that product: preserves every compact-data massive free solution only when is Killing. Retaining the forced correction changes the equation space and supplies a genuine coefficient gauge action. A past-trivial retarded harmonic section then makes the complete first-order functional a quotient observable. For a triangular system with a fixed free scalar background, compact constrained de Donder Cauchy data modulo residual wave gauges form a Hausdorff, well-posed quotient. We construct a compact coupled Ward pair with strictly positive on-shell value, although the immediate adjoint-exact compact repair vanishes on shell. Poisson compensation, compensator choice, and canonical normalization are treated separately. Finally, the sourced successor is divided into invariant equations, a gauge-fixed forced response, and descent on a named quotient. None of those sourced constructions is completed here.
sectionFront matterFront matter · lines 176–202
Open as its own pageEquation space and identification being tested Result Unchanged product: No descent for the exhibited symbol. Unchanged massive free scalar shell, with proposed variation No tangent action for general compact gauges. Coupled jet: , Descent through first order for the declared retarded group. C1 triangular system: , fixed Hausdorff Cauchy quotient; nonzero compact Ward observables. scopeScopeFront matter · lines 203–211
Open as its own pageThis is a classical quotient paper. It proves no physical Hilbert-space correspondence, measurement instrument, quantum record, Born theorem, contact-span separation, or interacting quantum coefficient. It does not solve the next matter-sourced gravitational reduction, construct a compact gravitational apparatus, or establish an asymptotic scattering theory. Companion manuscripts appear only as explicitly scoped comparisons.
Introduction: the equation space precedes descent
sectionIntroduction: the equation space precedes descentIntroduction: the equation space precedes descent · lines 217–251
Open as its own pageA proposed relational expression must define a function on the equivalence classes actually declared. This question precedes any subsequent representation or measurement construction:
Only the first object and its classical descent are studied here.
Two failures must be distinguished. An expression can assign different values to equivalent representatives. Alternatively, its proposed transformation can fail to preserve the equation space, so that the intended quotient action is not defined. An off-shell cancellation excludes neither failure.
Relational and metric-dependent coordinate constructions have a substantial literature; see, for example, Brunetti, Fredenhagen, and Rejzner BFR. Explicit gravitational dressings and their nonlocal kernels are developed by Donnelly and Giddings DG. Our question is narrower: for the displayed first-order functionals, which equations, identifications, and support prescriptions make descent valid?
sectionThe four resultsIntroduction: the equation space precedes descent › The four results · lines 252–295
Open as its own pageThe first negative result fixes a free scalar and varies only its metric representative. A compact gauge change of a Poisson compensator produces
We choose once so that this integral is nonzero. No function of the unchanged label can then agree with the symbol on both representatives. The same representatives yield a quantitative regulated obstruction.
The second negative result allows the scalar to move but retains its free equation. The required condition is
A solution-jet argument proves that this holds exactly for Minkowski Killing fields. In particular, no nonzero compactly supported gauge vector satisfies it.
The first positive result changes the equation space:
The coefficient transformation is an action on these equations. For a named past-trivial gauge group, a retarded harmonic compensator defines a unique orbit representative. The complete first-order scalar then descends.
The second positive result fixes a free background and uses the linear triangular system
Compact constrained harmonic data modulo residual wave gauges form a Hausdorff Cauchy quotient. A compact coupled Ward pair has a strictly positive value on an explicit solution.
- figureFour descent problemsIntroduction: the equation space precedes descent › The four results · III@2#fig:descent-ledger · lines 296–320metricscalarquotient / invariantobstruction / errorsupport / scopeEquation space first; descent second.declared variables and equationsidentification or proposed transformationresultExhibited Poisson symbol does not descend.Complete functional descends for the specified retarded gauge group.Hausdorff quotient Cauchy problem; nonzero compact Ward observables.
No arrow identifies these four quotients. They use different variables, equations, and actions.
classical descentrepresentation · not established hereinstrument · not established hererecord · not established hereThe four rows are different equation-space questions. The second row does not define a quotient by general compact gauges. No arrow identifying the rows is presumed.
sectionWhat is not identifiedIntroduction: the equation space precedes descent › What is not identified · lines 322–336
Open as its own pageThe retarded group and the C1 residual-wave group differ. Their intersection is zero when the retarded support requirement is imposed. The section proof for one group cannot be transplanted to the other.
Nor is C1 a linearization of the full Einstein–scalar system about a nonlinear solution . Its metric equation is vacuum linearized gravity; the stress of is not inserted into that equation. For the genuinely linearized Einstein–Klein–Gordon system on on-shell backgrounds, see Hack Hack. That system is not an additional premise here.
sectionAnalytical and bibliographic inputsIntroduction: the equation space precedes descent › Analytical and bibliographic inputs · lines 337–356
Open as its own pageThe differential identities, obstructions, orbit section, closed-range test, and compact Ward construction are proved below. The analytical background is smooth wave and Klein–Gordon Cauchy theory with finite propagation BGP; we include the estimates needed for its use.
The Coulomb comparison concerns precisely the kernels of the cited version of Donnelly and Giddings DG. Cheung's companion manuscripts are cited as versioned unpublished source records Registry. Their comparison role is collected in Section sec:nontransfer. They are not hypotheses of the five principal theorems: Theorems thm:product, thm:Killing, thm:jet-descent, thm:reduced-Cauchy, and thm:compact-pair.
Conventions, signs, and support
sectionGeometry and operatorsConventions, signs, and support › Geometry and operators · III@2#eq:Lh, III@2#eq:Glin · lines 361–410
Open as its own pageOn , use
where . All fields and gauge parameters are real unless Fourier transforms or complex-valued comparison functions are explicitly used. Indices are raised with , and symmetrization includes the factor .
For a covector , set
The same letter denotes its raised vector when used in .
For a symmetric covariant tensor , define
and
In four dimensions, . Our linearized Einstein normalization is
lemmaLemma: Sign and differential identitiesConventions, signs, and support › Geometry and operators · III@2#lem:signs, III@2#eq:commutator, III@2#eq:sign-lock · proof attached · lines 411–457
Open as its own pageFor smooth and ,
Moreover,
and therefore
Proof. In , the derivatives of cancel, leaving . Insert this and
into (eq:Glin) to obtain .
Taking the divergence of (eq:Glin) gives
Apply the product rule twice to . The constant mass term commutes with , proving (eq:commutator). Substituting in (eq:Lh) gives its negative.
sectionGeometry and operatorsConventions, signs, and support › Geometry and operators · III@2#eq:triangular-signs · lines 457–467
Open as its own pageThe consistent triangular signs are consequently
sectionFormal orderConventions, signs, and support › Formal order · lines 468–482
Open as its own pageFor first-order coefficients, use
Equality in is coefficient equality, not a numerical remainder estimate.
In the two-representative estimates, can instead be a real parameter in an exact degree-one polynomial. We indicate that use explicitly. A real representation or cutoff parameter in a different model is not automatically this nilpotent formal parameter.
sectionSupport classesConventions, signs, and support › Support classes · lines 483–504
Open as its own pageFix a reference time . For this paper, a smooth field is called spacelike compact if, for some ,
This concrete cone condition is sufficient for every use below. It follows from compact Cauchy data for homogeneous wave and Klein–Gordon solutions.
Let be the smooth fields supported in for some compact spacetime set . Use this notation componentwise for vectors and tensors. Such fields have zero data on a sufficiently early Cauchy slice and bounded spatial support on each finite time interval.
Compact spacetime support, compact Cauchy data, and future support from a compact set are different conditions.
lemmaLemma: Smooth forced evolutionConventions, signs, and support › Smooth forced Cauchy evolution · III@2#lem:PDE · proof attached · lines 507–568
Open as its own pageFor , the equation
has a unique global smooth solution for smooth compact Cauchy data and smooth forcing with bounded spatial support on every finite time interval. On such intervals, the solution depends continuously on data and forcing in their smooth topologies. Finite propagation gives the corresponding cone-support bounds when the data and source satisfy those bounds.
Proof. Let . Spatial Fourier transformation gives
For , the sine quotient has the continuous value at zero frequency. On a finite interval, the source has uniformly compact spatial support and bounded smooth seminorms, so the required Sobolev integrals are defined. Differentiation verifies the equation and data.
For an integer , use
Integration by parts and Cauchy–Schwarz give
The backwards estimate and Gronwall's inequality give uniqueness and continuous dependence. Increasing , applying Sobolev embedding, and using the equation for time derivatives give smooth estimates.
For finite propagation, integrate the local energy identity outside an expanding ball. The outward characteristic flux has the required nonnegative sign. Where initial data and forcing vanish, the exterior energy remains zero. The same argument after a time translation proves the retarded support statement. These are the flat-space estimates underlying the standard general Cauchy theory BGP (Chapter 3).
The unchanged free-product obstruction
sectionThe quotient being testedThe unchanged free-product obstruction › The quotient being tested · lines 575–599
Open as its own pageLet
and
Choose any linear subspace containing
Define
Only the metric is quotiented.
definitionDefinition: DescentThe unchanged free-product obstruction › The quotient being tested · lines 600–609
Open as its own pageA function on descends through if there is a function on with
Equivalently, is constant on every fiber of . Failure of this set-theoretic condition excludes continuous or smooth descent as well.
sectionSpatial Poisson compensationThe unchanged free-product obstruction › Spatial Poisson compensation · III@2#eq:Newton, III@2#eq:Poisson · lines 611–642
Open as its own pageFor compact smooth or Schwartz spatial sources, define
The fundamental-solution identity gives
For the second equality, the difference is smooth harmonic and tends to zero at infinity, hence vanishes.
For smooth spacelike-compact , apply at each time:
These potentials are smooth but need not be spatially compact. Their sources have uniformly bounded support on finite time intervals, so time differentiation is legitimate.
propositionProposition: Poisson compensationThe unchanged free-product obstruction › Spatial Poisson compensation · III@2#prop:Poisson · proof attached · lines 643–664
Open as its own pageFor compact smooth ,
Proof. Directly,
Therefore
Use linearity.
sectionSpatial Poisson compensationThe unchanged free-product obstruction › Spatial Poisson compensation · III@2#eq:Poisson-functional · lines 664–679
Open as its own pageFor real , put
The displayed expression is an exact degree-one polynomial, not an all-orders invariant.
theoremTheorem: Free-product obstructionThe unchanged free-product obstruction › A fixed nonzero gap · III@2#thm:product, III@2#eq:product-gap · proof attached · lines 682–727
Open as its own pageThere exist fixed real
such that
and
For every real , this fixed symbol does not descend through . Its first-order coefficient does not descend either.
Proof. Choose compact scalar data at :
where near the origin. The resulting free solution has , so this derivative is positive on some relatively compact spacetime neighborhood .
Take nonnegative nonzero . Choose a compact gauge vector equal to near . Then .
Both and solve the vacuum metric equation, and they have the same quotient class. Their scalar labels agree. Since , equation (eq:product-gap) follows. A descended function cannot distinguish these representatives.
sectionA fixed nonzero gapThe unchanged free-product obstruction › A fixed nonzero gap · lines 727–737
Open as its own pageThe theorem exhibits one fixed symbol. It does not assert that every scalar functional fails to descend; metric-independent scalar functionals already descend through the metric quotient.
The argument uses only . Adding a linear compensator term annihilating does not remove this particular gap.
lemmaLemma: Two-representative estimateThe unchanged free-product obstruction › A fixed nonzero gap · III@2#lem:two-point · proof attached · lines 738–750
Open as its own pageIf , then for and ,
Proof. Insert the common value between the two values of , and use the triangle inequality.
corollaryCorollary: Nonvanishing approximation errorThe unchanged free-product obstruction › A fixed nonzero gap · III@2#cor:product-error · proof attached · lines 752–770
Open as its own pageFor the fixed data above and any ,
Agreement to on both representatives is impossible.
Proof. Apply Lemma lem:two-point.
sectionSpatial Fourier regularizationThe unchanged free-product obstruction › Spatial Fourier regularization · lines 772–800
Open as its own pageUse the unitary transform
Choose smooth with
For , let
and
Replacing in (eq:Poisson) gives and the symbol .
lemmaLemma: Regulated compensationThe unchanged free-product obstruction › Spatial Fourier regularization · III@2#lem:regulated · proof attached · lines 801–833
Open as its own pageFor compact smooth ,
For the fixed witness,
as , .
Proof. The multiplier identity proves the first claim.
On a compact time interval containing , the spatial Fourier transforms of have a uniform Schwartz bound. Thus
tends to zero uniformly on that interval. One can use a fixed integrable Schwartz envelope and dominated convergence. Integration against the fixed compact test factors gives the result.
theoremTheorem: Regulator-stable failure of descentThe unchanged free-product obstruction › Spatial Fourier regularization · III@2#thm:regulated-gap · proof attached · lines 835–856
Open as its own pageFor every family ,
For fixed real , the bound tends to .
Proof. The symbol difference is , while the quotient labels remain identical. Apply Lemma lem:two-point and the convergence lemma.
sectionSpatial Fourier regularizationThe unchanged free-product obstruction › Spatial Fourier regularization · lines 856–863
Open as its own pageThis regularizes a classical symbol only. It does not concern an operator or measurement. It also does not obstruct a different quotient that changes the scalar identification along with the metric.
Moving the scalar: the massive free-shell obstruction
scopeDifferent premisesMoving the scalar: the massive free-shell obstruction · lines 868–872
Open as its own pagepremises{ The product theorem fixes and varies . The present theorem moves by , while retaining the massive free equation. Neither statement is a reformulation of the other.}
lemmaLemma: Second jets of compact-data free solutionsMoving the scalar: the massive free-shell obstruction › Realization of solution jets · III@2#lem:jets · proof attached · lines 876–910
Open as its own pageAt any , let , , and symmetric satisfy
There is with
Proof. Translate to . Choose compact smooth data with
Finite polynomials multiplied by a bump equal to one near the origin realize these data jets. The free equation supplies
which is the remaining required component.
theoremTheorem: Free-shell tangency is exactly Killing symmetryMoving the scalar: the massive free-shell obstruction › Realization of solution jets · III@2#thm:Killing · proof attached · lines 912–967
Open as its own pageFor smooth , the following are equivalent:
for every ;
;
for constants with .
A field satisfying these conditions and vanishing on a nonempty open set is identically zero.
Proof. Assume (i). At a fixed point, (eq:commutator) and the jet lemma imply
for every allowed jet, where
Take and arbitrary , obtaining .
Take and arbitrary trace-free symmetric . The annihilator of that codimension-one space is the span of the trace functional, so
at the point. Finally take and a symmetric of trace . Then , hence . The point was arbitrary, so .
Differentiating the Killing equation gives
Thus is affine with antisymmetric linear part.
Conversely, an affine Killing field has and vanishing symmetric first derivative. The commutator identity gives (i). An affine field vanishing on an open set is zero.
corollaryCorollary: No general compact gauge action on the free shellMoving the scalar: the massive free-shell obstruction › Realization of solution jets · III@2#cor:free-shell · proof attached · lines 969–985
Open as its own pageThe prescription
does not define a tangent action on the unchanged massive free solution space for all compact smooth . This conclusion does not depend on a proposed metric transformation.
Proof. The tangent space of the linear solution space is itself. Tangency at every solution is condition (i) above. A compactly supported Killing field vanishes on an open set and is therefore zero.
sectionRealization of solution jetsMoving the scalar: the massive free-shell obstruction › Realization of solution jets · lines 985–989
Open as its own pageThe assumption is used in eliminating . No massless version of this classification is asserted.
propositionProposition: Fixed tangency witnessMoving the scalar: the massive free-shell obstruction › A positive smeared defect · III@2#prop:tangency-witness · proof attached · lines 992–1027
Open as its own pageThere exist real compact-data , compact smooth , and nonnegative , , such that
For ,
Proof. Take equal to one near the origin and scalar data
For equal to one near zero, set
At the origin,
Thus . It exceeds on a neighborhood. A normalized nonnegative test supported there proves the first claim; proves the second.
sectionA positive smeared defectMoving the scalar: the massive free-shell obstruction › A positive smeared defect · lines 1027–1033
Open as its own pageAn additional regular formal coefficient of order cannot remove this order- equation defect. Numerical remainder claims would require additional estimates.
The coupled first-order jet and retarded harmonic section
sectionThe changed scalar equationsThe coupled first-order jet and retarded harmonic section › The changed scalar equations · III@2#eq:operator-variation, III@2#eq:jet-scalar · lines 1038–1068
Open as its own pageFor ,
Substitution into
gives
Consequently obeys the coefficient equations
The second scalar coefficient is forced, not independently free.
propositionProposition: Coefficient gauge actionThe coupled first-order jet and retarded harmonic section › The changed scalar equations · III@2#prop:jet-action · proof attached · lines 1069–1095
Open as its own pageFor field-independent , define
This preserves (eq:jet-scalar) and , and
Proof. The transformed forced equation has left-hand side
The metric equation is preserved because . The group identities are immediate.
sectionThe changed scalar equationsThe coupled first-order jet and retarded harmonic section › The changed scalar equations · lines 1095–1100
Open as its own pageThis is the additive action on retained coefficients. Commutators of diffeomorphisms generated by and begin at order , which is not retained.
sectionPast-trivial gaugesThe coupled first-order jet and retarded harmonic section › Past-trivial gauges · III@2#eq:retarded-inverse, III@2#eq:retarded-compensator · lines 1101–1138
Open as its own pageLet
For , define to be the solution of
with zero data on a slice preceding . The forced Cauchy lemma constructs compatible solutions on all finite intervals, and finite propagation gives . The prescription is independent of the earlier slice.
We have
The second equality follows because the difference is homogeneous with zero past data.
Define
and
In , lower the index first.
lemmaLemma: Retarded section identitiesThe coupled first-order jet and retarded harmonic section › Past-trivial gauges · III@2#lem:retarded-section · proof attached · lines 1139–1168
Open as its own pageFor ,
Also,
and
Proof. Apply and (eq:retarded-inverse). Then
The other projector identities follow, and proves the final equality.
lemmaLemma: Support-dependent uniquenessThe coupled first-order jet and retarded harmonic section › Past-trivial gauges · III@2#lem:gauge-intersection · proof attached · lines 1170–1184
Open as its own pageA homogeneous vector wave in is zero. Thus
Proof. A field in has zero data on a sufficiently early slice. Homogeneous wave uniqueness makes it zero.
- figurePast-trivial gauges and residual wavesThe coupled first-order jet and retarded harmonic section › Past-trivial gauges · III@2#fig:gauge-support-classes · lines 1186–1208metricscalarquotient / invariantobstruction / errorsupport / scopeRetarded gauge classintersection of the two homogeneous-wave classes: zeroC1 residual gaugescompact, possibly nonzero data · generally not past trivial
The retarded inverse does not select a unique representative modulo all residual waves.
The support requirement is part of the gauge group. The retarded section removes no nonzero C1 residual wave by the identity , because that identity has a different domain.
definitionDefinition: Coupled first-order jetThe coupled first-order jet and retarded harmonic section › The coupled jet · III@2#def:jet · lines 1212–1222
Open as its own pageLet consist of triples satisfying
with smooth and spacelike compact. Let have . The gauge group is , acting by .
sectionThe coupled jetThe coupled first-order jet and retarded harmonic section › The coupled jet · III@2#eq:jet-section · lines 1222–1241
Open as its own pageThere is no spacelike-compact requirement on in this definition. Its harmonic part may be noncompact. The retarded prescription needs the condition on . The scalar forcing remains spacelike compact because its support is contained in that of .
Set
theoremTheorem: Unique retarded harmonic sectionThe coupled first-order jet and retarded harmonic section › The coupled jet · III@2#thm:retarded-section · proof attached · lines 1242–1279
Open as its own pageThe map obeys:
;
;
;
every -orbit meets exactly once.
It induces a bijection
This is an orbit-space assertion, not an infinite-dimensional quotient-manifold theorem.
Proof. Because , part (i) follows from the action. The equations are preserved by Proposition prop:jet-action. The scalar correction remains spacelike compact because its support is contained in that of . The retarded section identities supply .
Under , the scalar correction is
The metric projection is unchanged as well, proving (ii). On the slice, , proving (iii).
Part (i) gives existence. If and are harmonic with , then , hence by Lemma lem:gauge-intersection. The scalar correction is consequently unchanged.
- figureUnique retarded harmonic representativeThe coupled first-order jet and retarded harmonic section › The coupled jet · III@2#fig:retarded-jet-section · lines 1281–1302metricscalarquotient / invariantobstruction / errorsupport / scopegeneric point→bijection →Orbit-space statement, not a quotient-manifold theorem.need not be free.
The complete scalar coefficient and the metric representative transform together. The commuting diagram uses the past-trivial retarded group, not the residual-wave group.
lemmaLemma: Nonempty scalar fibersThe coupled first-order jet and retarded harmonic section › The coupled jet · III@2#lem:fibers · proof attached · lines 1304–1319
Open as its own pageFor smooth satisfying , , and , every pair of compact smooth scalar data determines a unique smooth spacelike-compact solution
Proof. The source is smooth and supported in the cone of . The forced Cauchy lemma gives the solution. Propagation from both compact initial data and the source cone gives a cone of slope one with possibly enlarged initial radius.
sectionThe complete quotient functionalThe coupled first-order jet and retarded harmonic section › The complete quotient functional · III@2#eq:retarded-functional · lines 1321–1334
Open as its own pageFor real compact , define
theoremTheorem: Descent on the coupled jetThe coupled first-order jet and retarded harmonic section › The complete quotient functional · III@2#thm:jet-descent · proof attached · lines 1335–1364
Open as its own pageThe functional descends to . If
then
Proof. Both coefficients are invariant by the section calculation, so the functional factors through the orbit map. On the slice, .
Writing ,
sectionThe complete quotient functionalThe coupled first-order jet and retarded harmonic section › The complete quotient functional · lines 1364–1370
Open as its own pageThe term cannot be omitted from the declared coupled equation space. It provides both the forced equation and the transformation needed for cancellation.
propositionProposition: The reduced correction need not be freeThe coupled first-order jet and retarded harmonic section › The complete quotient functional · III@2#prop:nonfree · proof attached · lines 1371–1395
Open as its own pageThere are slice data with .
Proof. Let
and all other components vanish. This tensor is trace free, divergence free, and a componentwise wave, so it is harmonic vacuum data.
Use the jet lemma to choose whose value and gradient vanish at the origin, with Hessian
and all other components zero there. Then . Every corresponding correction satisfies .
sectionA scalar symplectic consequence with metric fixedThe coupled first-order jet and retarded harmonic section › A scalar symplectic consequence with metric fixed · lines 1397–1423
Open as its own pageFix the reduced metric ; do not vary it. Put
and
Expansion gives
Thus solves exactly when
corollaryCorollary: Prescribed-metric scalar symplectic formThe coupled first-order jet and retarded harmonic section › A scalar symplectic consequence with metric fixed · III@2#cor:symplectic · proof attached · lines 1424–1469
Open as its own pageFor coefficientwise spacelike-compact solutions, define
The form is independent of , antisymmetric, -bilinear, and weakly nondegenerate.
Proof. Symmetry of gives
Support is bounded on finite slabs, so integration has no spatial boundary term.
At a fixed time set
The leading coefficient of is , hence it is invertible in . Arbitrary compact formal determine the coefficient Cauchy data. Solve first for , then for the forced .
The pairing is
If it vanishes for every , take and arbitrary real compact . Both coefficients of vanish distributionally. Then take and arbitrary real compact , obtaining . Cauchy uniqueness gives .
sectionA scalar symplectic consequence with metric fixedThe coupled first-order jet and retarded harmonic section › A scalar symplectic consequence with metric fixed · lines 1469–1475
Open as its own pageThis is not a dynamical gravity–matter symplectic reduction. The derivative of a field-dependent section has not been used to construct a full reduced symplectic form.
Compensator choice and classical kernel comparison
propositionProposition: Difference of compensatorsCompensator choice and classical kernel comparison › Different right inverses need not give the same observable · III@2#prop:choices · proof attached · lines 1482–1503
Open as its own pageLet be linear maps on a common metric domain, valued in smooth vector fields, with
on a common gauge class. For , one has , and
The difference is invariant under the common coefficient gauge action, but need not vanish.
Proof. Subtract the right-inverse identities. Under , is unchanged. Subtract the complete coefficient functionals.
sectionDifferent right inverses need not give the same observableCompensator choice and classical kernel comparison › Different right inverses need not give the same observable · lines 1503–1524
Open as its own pageAn actual section also requires to belong to the declared gauge group and its transformed configuration to remain admissible. The algebraic condition alone does not establish either fact.
Two right inverses with different boundary, initial-data, or support prescriptions need not define the same observable even when they invert the same formal differential operator.
On a common domain, has the right-inverse sign of , but may have tails or past behavior incompatible with . This does not identify the two sections.
A coupled Poisson coefficient would be
The unchanged-product expression tested earlier is different because it does not carry these complete coefficient data.
sectionPoisson and Coulomb kernelsCompensator choice and classical kernel comparison › Poisson and Coulomb kernels · III@2#eq:VC0, III@2#eq:VCi, III@2#eq:DC0, III@2#eq:DCi · lines 1525–1568
Open as its own pageAt fixed time let
For spatial Schwartz fields define the Coulomb kernels and their deformations as in the version-specific formulas of Donnelly and Giddings DG (Eq. (52), Eqs. (73)–(74)):
Fields in the integrals are evaluated at .
Our active convention is . The gauge parameter in the corresponding convention of DG has the opposite sign. The displayed kernel definitions themselves are unchanged.
propositionProposition: Classical kernel identityCompensator choice and classical kernel comparison › Poisson and Coulomb kernels · III@2#prop:DG · proof attached · lines 1569–1599
Open as its own pageFor ,
Proof. Integrating by parts in the Poisson formula gives
The kernels are locally integrable. Boundary terms from a shrinking inner sphere vanish; Schwartz decay removes the outer terms. Adding and subtracting the displayed Coulomb deformation kernels gives exactly these expressions.
sectionPoisson and Coulomb kernelsCompensator choice and classical kernel comparison › Poisson and Coulomb kernels · lines 1599–1611
Open as its own pageThe deformations annihilate compact pure gauges. Their distributional divergence identities, including the shrinking-sphere flux checks, are proved in Appendix app:audit.
This comparison identifies written kernels on a stated classical domain. It identifies neither retarded and instantaneous prescriptions nor all gauge-invariant additions.
The C1 triangular Cauchy quotient
scopeThe C1 background is prescribedThe C1 triangular Cauchy quotient · lines 1616–1623
Open as its own pageC1 background is prescribed{ The metric background is , and is a fixed free scalar. The metric perturbation is vacuum linearized, while the scalar perturbation is forced. This is not the fully coupled Einstein–scalar linearization about an on-shell nonlinear background. No stress source is inserted into the metric equation.}
sectionA fixed compact-data backgroundThe C1 triangular Cauchy quotient › A fixed compact-data background · III@2#eq:background, III@2#eq:plateau · lines 1625–1666
Open as its own pageTake , , and real with on . Let and define
Then
Finite propagation and local uniqueness give
The C1 equations are
Their coupled transformation is
Indeed,
It preserves harmonic representatives when .
Unlike the coupled jet, this solution space does not vary . It is linear in .
sectionZero-data response and homogeneous subtractionThe C1 triangular Cauchy quotient › Zero-data response and homogeneous subtraction · III@2#eq:response · lines 1667–1689
Open as its own pageFor scalar data , put
For a smooth scalar , write
Define
It has zero data at and solves . For , use the oriented integral.
propositionProposition: Exact gauge responseThe C1 triangular Cauchy quotient › Zero-data response and homogeneous subtraction · III@2#prop:subtraction · proof attached · lines 1690–1707
Open as its own pageWhenever the Cauchy problems are defined,
Proof. Both sides have zero data and solve
Use uniqueness.
sectionZero-data response and homogeneous subtractionThe C1 triangular Cauchy quotient › Zero-data response and homogeneous subtraction · lines 1707–1717
Open as its own pageThus
A zero-scalar-data prescription is not equivariant under all residual gauges. It remains zero-data exactly when has zero data.
sectionConstrained harmonic dataThe C1 triangular Cauchy quotient › Constrained harmonic data · III@2#eq:C1harmonic, III@2#eq:data-constraints · lines 1718–1779
Open as its own pageLet consist of pairs with compact smooth Cauchy data obeying
These imply . We do not need a theorem placing every vacuum gauge orbit into this representative class.
Write
The velocity datum is unrelated to . Set .
Let be the compact smooth tuples satisfying
. Choose radii , each large enough to contain . Let consist of constrained tuples supported in , with the inherited smooth Fréchet topology. Give
the locally convex inductive-limit topology.
Let consist of the solutions of (eq:C1harmonic) supported in
with the compact-open smooth topology. Give its locally convex inductive-limit topology. All compact-data solutions belong to some stage.
Each stage is a closed Fréchet subspace of its ambient smooth space: support and differential equations are closed conditions. The inclusions of successive stages are closed and preserve the stage topology. These declarations avoid relying on an unspecified topology for the union of compact-data solutions.
theoremTheorem: Unreduced Cauchy isomorphismThe C1 triangular Cauchy quotient › Constrained harmonic data · III@2#thm:Cauchy · proof attached · lines 1780–1833
Open as its own pageEvery determines a unique :
Evolution and Cauchy restriction are continuous linear inverses for the declared topologies. They are already continuous inverses on each corresponding support stage.
Proof. The metric formula is componentwise wave evolution, with the sine quotient equal to at zero frequency.
Let . It obeys , with
Both vanish by the constraints. Thus .
The scalar formula has the specified data and solves its forced equation. Uniqueness holds first for , then for .
On a fixed stage, . Propagation from the source cone and initial ball keeps the scalar in . Conversely, restriction of a stage solution gives data supported in , satisfying the constraints.
On each finite interval, multiplication by the fixed derivatives of maps the smooth seminorms of continuously to those of . The forced Cauchy estimates prove stagewise continuity of evolution. Restriction and time differentiation prove continuity of its inverse. The universal property of the locally convex inductive limits then gives continuous inverse maps on the unions.
sectionResidual vector-wave gaugesThe C1 triangular Cauchy quotient › Residual vector-wave gauges · III@2#eq:metric-gauge-data, III@2#eq:scalar-gauge-data · lines 1835–1889
Open as its own pageSet
with its usual test-function topology. For , let
These fields are spacelike compact but generally not past trivial.
The induced metric data are
The scalar data transform by
Here the subscript means evaluation at .
Let
be this combined continuous linear map. Its image is constrained because solves (eq:C1harmonic).
The invariant datum is the entire class
The scalar data do not descend separately.
sectionA closed-range membership testThe C1 triangular Cauchy quotient › A closed-range membership test · III@2#eq:range-reconstruction · lines 1890–1910
Open as its own pageFor arbitrary compact metric data define auxiliary fields
Denote this reconstruction by . The entries are smooth and tend to zero at spatial infinity. They may initially be noncompact. The differential expression can be evaluated on them without admitting them as gauge data.
lemmaLemma: Closed-range testThe C1 triangular Cauchy quotient › A closed-range membership test · III@2#lem:closed-range · proof attached · lines 1911–1973
Open as its own pageFor ,
When the equality on the right holds, all reconstructed fields are compact. The gauge range is closed in .
Proof. If for compact gauge data, then
Newton inversion recovers . The remaining reconstruction equations recover .
Conversely, assume the displayed membership equality. Outside a ball containing the metric-data support,
Differentiating and combining index permutations gives
The exterior is connected, so is affine there. Decay makes it zero.
Also , while gives . The exterior equation then yields . The decaying affine is zero there, as are the remaining . All reconstructed fields are compact. The assumed equality also supplies the scalar components, so lies in the gauge range.
For closedness, Newton convolution is continuous from each compact smooth support stage to with its compact-open topology. Move derivatives onto the compact source and use local integrability of the Newton kernel to obtain the seminorm estimates. Hence
is continuous on each , and therefore on , with values in a finite product of Hausdorff smooth spaces. The gauge range is its kernel and is closed.
sectionA closed-range membership testThe C1 triangular Cauchy quotient › A closed-range membership test · lines 1973–1978
Open as its own pageThe tails are auxiliary. Membership forces them to disappear. No noncompact gauge descriptor has been added to the quotient.
theoremTheorem: Well-posed reduced Cauchy problemThe C1 triangular Cauchy quotient › A closed-range membership test · III@2#thm:reduced-Cauchy · proof attached · lines 1979–2010
Open as its own pageLet
and
These are Hausdorff locally convex quotient spaces. Evolution induces a continuous linear bijection with continuous inverse:
Proof. The unreduced Cauchy isomorphism maps precisely to , by covariance and uniqueness. It intertwines the equivalence relations.
The data range is closed by Lemma lem:closed-range. Its image under the isomorphism is closed as well. Both quotients are Hausdorff. The continuous inverse maps induce continuous inverse quotient maps.
sectionA closed-range membership testThe C1 triangular Cauchy quotient › A closed-range membership test · lines 2010–2015
Open as its own pageThis theorem concerns constrained harmonic representatives modulo the specified residual group. It is not a global TT gauge-section theorem.
- figureStagewise Cauchy quotientThe C1 triangular Cauchy quotient › A closed-range membership test · III@2#fig:reduced-Cauchy · lines 2016–2038
The data and solution topologies are matched at support stages. Closedness of the residual gauge range makes both reduced spaces Hausdorff.
Compact coupled Ward observables
sectionA compact descent criterionCompact coupled Ward observables › A compact descent criterion · III@2#eq:Ward-observable · lines 2045–2055
Open as its own pageFor real compact smooth symmetric and scalar , define
propositionProposition: Coupled Ward identityCompact coupled Ward observables › A compact descent criterion · III@2#prop:Ward, III@2#eq:Ward · proof attached · lines 2056–2086
Open as its own pageIf
then is invariant under the coupled transformation for every smooth for which that transformation is considered. It defines a continuous linear functional on .
Proof. Compactness permits integration by parts:
The compact pairings are continuous on every solution stage and therefore on its inductive limit. Invariance gives descent through the quotient topology.
sectionA compact descent criterionCompact coupled Ward observables › A compact descent criterion · lines 2086–2093
Open as its own pageIf invariance is required against every compact gauge vector, the local identity is also necessary because compact tests separate smooth functions. For the smaller residual-wave test class, only sufficiency is asserted.
sectionThe adjoint-exact repair is on-shell zeroCompact coupled Ward observables › The adjoint-exact repair is on-shell zero · III@2#eq:exact-repair · lines 2094–2105
Open as its own pageFor , let
propositionProposition: Exact compact repairCompact coupled Ward observables › The adjoint-exact repair is on-shell zero · III@2#prop:zero-repair · proof attached · lines 2106–2142
Open as its own pageThe pair satisfies (eq:Ward), but
for every smooth solution of .
Proof. Using , direct differentiation gives
The mixed Hessian terms cancel; the remaining expression is
Integration by parts in (eq:Lh) gives
The Hessian contribution cancels after moving the derivative from the term. Formal self-adjointness of then gives
There is no Cauchy boundary term because is compact in spacetime.
sectionThe adjoint-exact repair is on-shell zeroCompact coupled Ward observables › The adjoint-exact repair is on-shell zero · lines 2142–2146
Open as its own pageThis proves vanishing for the displayed exact family. It does not classify all compact Ward pairs.
sectionAn explicit nonzero compact pairCompact coupled Ward observables › An explicit nonzero compact pair · III@2#eq:nonzero-J, III@2#eq:nonzero-c · lines 2147–2178
Open as its own pageChoose
and nonnegative nonzero
Their support cylinder lies strictly inside the plateau (eq:plateau).
Define
and
The denominator is nonzero, and vanishes near the endpoints. Thus is smooth and compact.
theoremTheorem: Nontrivial compact coupled quotient observableCompact coupled Ward observables › An explicit nonzero compact pair · III@2#thm:compact-pair, III@2#eq:positive-observable · proof attached · lines 2179–2242
Open as its own pageThe pair satisfies (eq:Ward) and defines a nonzero functional on . In particular,
and
Moreover,
Proof. On the coefficient support,
For , the Ward expression is
For spatial , both terms vanish. The identity also holds outside the compact support.
The test solution has and a free scalar with compact data. Its value is
Integration by parts has no endpoint term. Both factors are positive.
If for compact smooth , then
contradicting positivity.
sectionAn explicit nonzero compact pairCompact coupled Ward observables › An explicit nonzero compact pair · lines 2242–2255
Open as its own pageThe pair is genuinely coupled:
Neither term is separately invariant under unrestricted compact gauge variations. Its scalar coefficient cannot lie in the adjoint-exact family.
The test solution has nonzero homogeneous scalar data. It is not in a prescription setting 's initial data to zero; that prescription is not preserved by all residual gauges.
- figureExact zero repair, not every compact Ward pairCompact coupled Ward observables › An explicit nonzero compact pair · III@2#fig:compact-Ward · lines 2256–2277
The zero repair theorem is a statement about an exact family, not a classification of compact coupled observables.
sectionHomogeneous data belong to the quotient tupleCompact coupled Ward observables › Homogeneous data belong to the quotient tuple · lines 2279–2305
Open as its own pageEvery C1 solution decomposes uniquely as
Under a residual gauge,
The homogeneous scalar data change by (eq:scalar-gauge-data). They therefore belong in the full quotient datum.
The conclusion is existence:
No complete compact-current classification is claimed.
What instantaneous Poisson compensation establishes
sectionFormal cancellation is not unchanged-product descentWhat instantaneous Poisson compensation establishes › Formal cancellation is not unchanged-product descent · lines 2310–2341
Open as its own pageConsider the active formal variation
On smooth configurations in the compensator domain,
formally, because
and the leading variation of the correction is
This varies the scalar. The map does not. The varied scalar also need not remain free. Neither negative theorem is contradicted.
In coefficient notation, the cancellation is
not .
sectionCanonical temporal normalizationWhat instantaneous Poisson compensation establishes › Canonical temporal normalization · lines 2342–2367
Open as its own pageWrite
and choose
With
declare the quadratic kinetic density
This follows from the ADM kinetic term with Einstein–Hilbert coefficient .
propositionProposition: Temporal dressing in canonical variablesWhat instantaneous Poisson compensation establishes › Canonical temporal normalization · III@2#prop:ADM · proof attached · lines 2368–2390
Open as its own pageFor this normalization,
Thus
Proof. Differentiate the kinetic density with the symmetric-tensor convention, and take its spatial trace. Then . Use the definition of .
sectionCanonical temporal normalizationWhat instantaneous Poisson compensation establishes › Canonical temporal normalization · lines 2390–2396
Open as its own pageThe momentum agrees with the displayed ADM convention in DG (Eq. (70)). It is not the momentum of an unspecified alternative gauge-fixed Lagrangian.
sectionLeading instantaneous slice inversionWhat instantaneous Poisson compensation establishes › Leading instantaneous slice inversion · lines 2397–2435
Open as its own pageUse
and
The generator
gives
For , ,
propositionProposition: Decaying leading inverseWhat instantaneous Poisson compensation establishes › Leading instantaneous slice inversion · III@2#prop:instantaneous-inverse · proof attached · lines 2436–2460
Open as its own pageLet . For Schwartz , the unique descriptor in sending the leading conditions to zero is
Equivalently,
Proof. The required descriptor is . Newton inversion gives existence. The difference of two descriptors is smooth harmonic and decays, hence vanishes.
sectionLeading instantaneous slice inversionWhat instantaneous Poisson compensation establishes › Leading instantaneous slice inversion · lines 2460–2470
Open as its own pageThis decaying class differs from the compact gauge class. The inversion does not prove preservation of the slice by evolution. The conditions are not mutually commuting:
A full Dirac-bracket calculation needs more than .
theoremTheorem: Compact-kernel obstructionWhat instantaneous Poisson compensation establishes › No exact compact linear compensator · III@2#thm:no-compact · proof attached · lines 2473–2495
Open as its own pageFor fixed , no linear distributional functional of compact spacetime support satisfies
for every compact smooth . The same holds for a compact spatially supported time-slice functional using only finitely many time derivatives of .
Proof. Choose a compact set containing the distributional support and . Take a compact vector field constant on its neighborhood, with a nonzero -component. Then vanishes near the support, so its pairing is zero, while the required value is nonzero.
For a time-slice functional, make the field constant in time as well near the relevant support. All finitely many tested derivatives vanish there.
sectionNo exact compact linear compensatorWhat instantaneous Poisson compensation establishes › No exact compact linear compensator · lines 2495–2499
Open as its own pageThis does not exclude compact coupled Ward pairs, which use different variables and a different cancellation.
propositionProposition: Nonzero-total-source tailsWhat instantaneous Poisson compensation establishes › A separate source-support fact · III@2#prop:source-support · proof attached · lines 2502–2532
Open as its own pageIf has , no smooth compact symmetric tensor solves
A decaying solution is
with
The expression vanishes on spatial TT tensors and is unchanged by spatial pure gauges.
Proof. Integrating second derivatives of compact gives zero. For , . The tail is the leading Newton multipole. The TT statement is immediate. For a spatial gauge addition,
sectionA separate source-support factWhat instantaneous Poisson compensation establishes › A separate source-support fact · lines 2532–2539
Open as its own pageThis is a prescribed elliptic source problem, not either quotient constructed above. It explains why compact-support assumptions cannot be transferred to a sourced metric problem by analogy.
Constructions that do not discharge the sourced successor
sectionConstructions that do not discharge the sourced successorConstructions that do not discharge the sourced successor · lines 2541–2547
Open as its own pageA later construction does not change the domain or equivalence relation of an earlier theorem. The four opening rows remain different questions.
sectionThree successor objectsConstructions that do not discharge the sourced successor › Three successor objects · lines 2548–2578
Open as its own pageBefore posing a sourced problem, specify an action and source normalization, the coefficient equation space, its gauge group, support classes, and initial or boundary conditions. An evaluation set is not a quotient unless an action preserving that set and the resulting equivalence relation have been supplied.
For definiteness, one possible future gauge specification is the initial-surface-fixing subgroup
It is contained in , and its fields vanish on a neighborhood of the initial surface. A formal second-order prescription could take both coefficient descriptors in this group. This is not the C1 residual-wave group.
For a sourced successor, allow smooth metric coefficients unless a separate asymptotic class is proved appropriate. Do not impose compact metric data merely because the scalar data are compact. Scalar coefficients may be required to be spacelike compact. Invariant initial metric data must satisfy their sourced constraints; arbitrary zero metric data are not automatically admissible.
definitionDefinition: Three successor objectsConstructions that do not discharge the sourced successor › Three successor objects · III@2#prop:three-successor · lines 2579–2607
Open as its own pageFor a selected sourced Einstein–scalar model, distinguish:
Invariant coupled jet. The coefficients solve the expanded invariant equations, including the stress compatibility and Cauchy constraints implied by the chosen action and normalization. The allowed gauge transformations must preserve that equation space.
Gauge-fixed forced response. A named reduced operator is inverted with a declared gauge-fixing and support or initial-data prescription. For example, one may prescribe de Donder-reduced wave equations and zero response data at . Such a reduced response must be checked separately against the invariant constraints.
Reduced functional. A complete coefficient functional is shown to be constant on a named quotient of (i), or on a separately justified quotient of (ii). Its correction includes both the forced scalar coefficient and the coordinate compensator.
The full sourced successor comprising these objects is not constructed in this paper. Existence of (ii) alone does not imply existence of (i), and it does not establish descent in (iii).
sectionThree successor objectsConstructions that do not discharge the sourced successor › Three successor objects · lines 2607–2614
Open as its own pageA gauge transformation is not itself a right inverse. A plateau switch, a ramp, or a different initial-velocity prescription can define a different response problem or inverse operator. Its relation to the retarded section must be proved, not inferred from terminology.
propositionProposition: A reduced wave inverse need not solve invariant equationsConstructions that do not discharge the sourced successor › Three successor objects · III@2#prop:forced-not-invariant · proof attached · lines 2615–2642
Open as its own pageThere are smooth compact symmetric sources for which the past-zero reduced equation
has a smooth retarded solution, while
has no smooth solution. This example is not an Einstein–scalar source model.
Proof. Choose compact smooth with , and let , all other components zero. Then .
The reduced equation has solution
by the retarded wave construction and . If the invariant equation had a solution, the linearized Bianchi identity would imply , a contradiction.
sectionThree successor objectsConstructions that do not discharge the sourced successor › Three successor objects · lines 2642–2647
Open as its own pageThe proposition establishes the logical nonimplication. For a conserved source and compatible data, a reduced solution may also solve the invariant equations; that possibility is not excluded.
propositionProposition: Persistence on the unchanged identificationConstructions that do not discharge the sourced successor › Higher coefficients do not alter lower-order obstructions · III@2#prop:lower-order-persistence · proof attached · lines 2650–2672
Open as its own pageKeep the map and the fixed witness of Theorem thm:product. Adding regular formal terms beginning at order cannot make
constant on that witness fiber. Likewise, adding terms beginning at order to cannot remove the nonzero order- free-shell defect of Proposition prop:tangency-witness.
Proof. The first difference has coefficient at order . The second equation defect has coefficient . Formal equality with nonnegative powers requires each coefficient to vanish separately.
sectionHigher coefficients do not alter lower-order obstructionsConstructions that do not discharge the sourced successor › Higher coefficients do not alter lower-order obstructions · lines 2672–2680
Open as its own pageRetaining changes the equation space and identification. It does not cancel the earlier theorems. A second metric coefficient likewise does not make the old Poisson symbol constant on , or make a general compact Lie derivative tangent to the unchanged massive shell.
sectionScoped companion comparisonsConstructions that do not discharge the sourced successor › Scoped companion comparisons · lines 2681–2746
Open as its own pageThe following citations refer to source records, not new inputs. Where only a summary or excerpt is available, no independent verification of the complete companion proof is claimed.
strength and selected representations. Landmark II's finite certificate has a different object and domain from a quotient identity CheungII (statement
:certificate). A finite fit is not automatically a global functional identity. No catalogue entry or target coefficient from II is a counterterm in this paper.Landmark IV describes selected represented models, not a representation of every observable on the present quotients CheungIV (statement
:model1). Gauge invariance is not prescription independence. Its representation parameter is not identified with the formal nilpotent .-background currents, response, and higher jets. Landmark V uses the same sign identity and fixed-time response mechanism, but studies its own fixed-background metric functionals, compact representatives, and initial-surface terms CheungV (statements
:gaugeidentity,:defect, and:rawclassification). It is not a replacement for the coupled quotient. The nonzero Ward pair here is neither the vanished exact repair nor a residual witness imported from V.Landmark VI continues a coupled-coordinate construction to higher coefficients on a finite-time formal domain CheungVI (statements
:descentand:gauge-action). Its transformations supported away from the initial surface are not identified with the whole group . Neither result is a premise of the other, and neither constructs the sourced successor posed here.VII-A's plateau-supported intertwining and larger-support defect belong to its switched model CheungVIIA (statement
:plateauand corollary:nohigherrepair). The lower-order persistence principle is shared; the defect is not. That defect is not a failure of Theorem thm:retarded-section.X-A's coordinate intertwiner retains equations, data, and switches CheungXA (statement
:coordinate). Its complete first relational coefficient includes the switched scalar solution minus the coordinate dressing. The dressing alone is not a forced scalar correction, and X-A is not a repair of the Fourier regulator in this paper.compatibility versus gauge-fixed solvability. XI-A records an empty invariant jet for a specified input and switched model, while XI-B explicitly retains gauge-fixed constructions without repairing that jet CheungXIA,CheungXIB. XII-C recomputes compatibility for a different selected action; XII-D constructs its corresponding forced response CheungXIIC (statement
:empty) CheungXIID (statement:response). These records illustrate the distinction in Definition prop:three-successor.sectionScoped companion comparisonsConstructions that do not discharge the sourced successor › Scoped companion comparisons · lines 2746–2788
Open as its own pageTheir switches, actions, inputs, and stress conditions are not those of an unspecified unswitched Einstein–scalar successor. They prove no emptiness theorem for the proposed sourced problem of Section sec:conclusion and repair none of the current obstructions.
tangency and relative evaluation. XIII-D's causal zero-past variations preserve a separately named homogeneous free shell, forcing its induced variations to vanish CheungXIIID (statement
:triviality). This is a comparison with the principle “declare the shell first”, not the massive Killing classification above.XIV-A's relative master-equation identity and XIV-B's free-shell ghost intersection concern their own relative spaces CheungXIVA (statement
:relative) CheungXIVB (statement:ghost). An evaluation identity does not itself construct a quotient. Their relative ghost conditions are not the gauge group of , and no embedding of their relative differential into the current coupled jet is supplied here.backgrounds and observational certificates. Em02-E constructs a classical relational lapse on a prescribed power-law Einstein–scalar background through second order CheungEm02E (statements
:lapseand:release). It is not the Minkowski jet used here, and its incomplete quantum audit is not a theorem of III.En01-B's sphere contrast and En01-C's statistical certificate concern their stated diagnostic and record models CheungEn01B (statement
:contrast) CheungEn01C (statement:certificate). Neither derives the present quotient or Einstein dynamics.No claim that the entire I, Em, En, Psy, Hawk, or XVI series has been exhaustively inspected is made. No descended scalar on the four present domains is imported from those tracks.
sectionSeparate analytic stopsConstructions that do not discharge the sourced successor › Separate analytic stops · lines 2789–2815
Open as its own pageThe supplied XIV-H version records its internal-amplitude stop at H2 CheungXIVH (statement
:H2). The subsequent XIV-I version supplies a named I2 internal module, but leaves the joint characteristic map unresolved at I3 CheungXIVI (statements:I2and:I3). XIV-J supplies a partial supported-sector reference on its off-characteristic domain and leaves the full map unresolved at J2 CheungXIVJ (statements:J2,:release, and:noadmission).These are version-specific documentary statements. An internal reconstruction, a presentation-kernel descent condition, and field-equation quotient descent are different constructions. None supplies an interacting quantum coefficient here.
This manuscript closes neither O.1 nor the external characteristic programme, admits no quantum coefficient, opens no XV-B admission exit, and claims no compilation. In particular, the stated O.1 status
_CLOSEDis not changed. A missing construction is not a nonexistence theorem.
Conclusion and the sourced successor
sectionConclusion and the sourced successorConclusion and the sourced successor · lines 2817–2843
Open as its own pageThe proved results concern their actual domains:
The exhibited Poisson symbol is not constant on unchanged free-product fibers, with a regulator-stable gap.
General compact scalar Lie derivatives are not tangent to the unchanged massive free shell. The preserving vector fields are exactly Killing fields.
The forced scalar coefficient changes the equation space and gives a genuine coefficient action. A past-trivial retarded harmonic section makes the complete first-order functional descend.
The C1 constrained harmonic data modulo residual waves have a Hausdorff, well-posed Cauchy quotient. The explicit compact coupled Ward pair is nonzero.
Poisson compensation, canonical slice inversion, and compensator choice remain separate from descent.
None requires a represented observable or measurement construction.
sectionAn unswitched sourced model as a proposed next problemConclusion and the sourced successor › An unswitched sourced model as a proposed next problem · III@2#eq:sourced-successor · lines 2844–2898
Open as its own pageFor a concrete source convention, take the minimally coupled scalar action together with Einstein–Hilbert coefficient . Write
where
Then the Einstein equation is
This normalization is compatible with the ADM subsection. It has no role in the preceding quotient proofs.
Set
The invariant order- metric equation is
where is defined as the coefficient of in . The complete successor also includes the scalar equation through that order, its gauge action, and its constraints.
By the linearized Bianchi identity, a necessary compatibility condition for (eq:sourced-successor) is
This must be checked for the actual model. For the unswitched minimal scalar,
This elementary conservation fact is not a sourced Cauchy-existence, constraint-solving, or quotient theorem. Switching the action or source changes the compatibility audit.
scopeThree sourced successor problemsConclusion and the sourced successor › An unswitched sourced model as a proposed next problem · lines 2899–2926
Open as its own pagesourced successor problems{ Use a named gauge group and support class, for example the initial-surface-fixing specification of Section sec:nontransfer, rather than silently importing the C1 residual group.
S1. Invariant coupled jet. Define and solve the full Einstein–scalar coefficient equations, including stress compatibility and sourced Cauchy constraints. Specify permitted metric asymptotics. The coupled first-order scalar result alone does not solve S1.
S2. Gauge-fixed response. Choose the reduced operator, gauge-fixing, and initial-data or retarded prescription. Construct its forced responses and check which satisfy the invariant constraints. Existence of a reduced inverse alone does not solve S1.
S3. Quotient functional. On a named quotient of S1, or a separately justified quotient associated with S2, construct the complete reduced functional or prove a new descent obstruction. A coordinate dressing or one forced response alone does not establish S3.}
sectionAn unswitched sourced model as a proposed next problemConclusion and the sourced successor › An unswitched sourced model as a proposed next problem · lines 2926–2935
Open as its own pageA later result must state its object, equation space, equivalence relation, gauge class, and inverse prescription. A higher coefficient, a different background, a finite certificate, or a measurement interface cannot substitute for those declarations.
Sign, inverse, boundary, and kernel audit
sectionFive distinct mapsSign, inverse, boundary, and kernel audit › Five distinct maps · lines 2940–2991
Open as its own pageMap Identity used Domain or prescription Newton Compact or Schwartz sources; decaying inverse branch. Finite-radius Ball integral; explicit boundary traces. Fourier Smooth infrared/ultraviolet multiplier; not an exact inverse. Retarded Future support from a compact set. Canonical Inverse of Leading phase-space gauge conditions; decaying descriptors. The canonical inverse uses , but is a map between different phase-space quantities with a different normalization. None of the five maps is identified merely because their formulas contain an inverse Laplacian or wave operator.
The compensation signs are
whereas
on .
A homogeneous wave is zero in the past-trivial class but need not be zero in the compact-Cauchy-data class. This is why the retarded section proof does not transplant to C1.
sectionExact finite-radius boundary errorSign, inverse, boundary, and kernel audit › Exact finite-radius boundary error · lines 2992–3006
Open as its own pageFor , put
and
propositionProposition: Boundary errorSign, inverse, boundary, and kernel audit › Exact finite-radius boundary error · III@2#prop:boundary-error · proof attached · lines 3007–3037
Open as its own pageFor smooth ,
Replacing by in the Poisson compensator gives
Thus formally
Proof. Green's second identity and give
Apply this to the variations of , with . The scalar leading variation cancels the term.
sectionExact finite-radius boundary errorSign, inverse, boundary, and kernel audit › Exact finite-radius boundary error · lines 3037–3047
Open as its own pageFor a constant , the left-hand side is zero, so . Truncating the spatial integral does not preserve exact compensation without a boundary check.
For gauges supported strictly inside the ball, both boundary traces vanish. That special case does not justify dropping them for a larger class.
sectionFourier compensation errorSign, inverse, boundary, and kernel audit › Fourier compensation error · lines 3048–3074
Open as its own pageThe regulated inverse obeys
so
and
The multiplier need not be a projection. Its error is not the finite-radius boundary error.
For fixed compact smooth test data, this formal compensation error tends to zero. It does not repair the unchanged-product gap, where the scalar is held fixed and the limiting difference is .
sectionDistributional kernel checksSign, inverse, boundary, and kernel audit › Distributional kernel checks · lines 3075–3125
Open as its own pageFor the temporal deformation, let
Away from zero,
The shrinking-sphere flux of this degree- kernel tends to zero. Thus distributionally.
Only the -symmetric part of the spatial kernel contributes:
It satisfies away from zero. Its flux is
Replacing a smooth test on the sphere by its value at zero leaves an error tending to zero. There is no delta contribution, and the divergence identity holds distributionally.
Integration by parts against compact pure gauges therefore gives
Together with the kernel comparison and Poisson compensation, this also checks the Coulomb transformation sign in our convention.
The general kernel comparison requires spatial Schwartz behavior. No boundary identity for arbitrary metric tails is asserted.
sectionReconstruction is not gauge admissionSign, inverse, boundary, and kernel audit › Reconstruction is not gauge admission · lines 3126–3141
Open as its own pageIn the closed-range proof, is defined for all compact data. It is not a gauge-fixing prescription on every datum. The equality
forces the Newton tails to disappear.
The canonical inverse instead explicitly permits decaying descriptors in . It does not prove compactness. Neither is the retarded spacetime inverse.
sectionFixed parameters and field-dependent sectionsSign, inverse, boundary, and kernel audit › Fixed parameters and field-dependent sections · lines 3142–3155
Open as its own pageThe action is first proved for a field-independent parameter. At each configuration, the section evaluates that action at . This proves an orbit identity.
Differentiating the section with respect to fields is another operation and introduces derivatives of . Those terms cannot be discarded in a dynamical symplectic reduction. The scalar symplectic corollary fixes and does not perform that reduction.
sectionCompact adjoint repair and initial surfacesSign, inverse, boundary, and kernel audit › Compact adjoint repair and initial surfaces · lines 3156–3174
Open as its own pageBoth identities
use compact smooth spacetime .
Replacing by a time-truncated response kernel can introduce initial-surface distributions and changes the argument. The zero-repair theorem does not make that replacement.
The positive Ward pair avoids it differently: its coefficient is not for any compact smooth , as shown by its positive pairing with a free homogeneous solution.
Declarations
sectionDeclarationsDeclarations · lines 3175–3206
Open as its own pageof the work. This is a theoretical study of classical differential equations, gauge actions, and quotient functionals. No empirical data are used.
and provenance. The definitions and proofs required for the stated classical results are included. Standard Cauchy theory and the provenance of the compared Coulomb kernels are cited. Companion manuscripts are identified by registry identifier, file, version, and supplied statement locators. No publication date, DOI, or journal status is invented for them.
to Landmark III. This manuscript is a revised self-contained presentation of the supplied Landmark III. The companion-comparison section adds equation-space and source discipline, not premises or sourced successor theorems.
status. No machine-checked proof, successful compilation, or verified page count is claimed. The figures are newly drawn explanations of the displayed arguments; they are not claimed to reproduce an unavailable registered layout. No physical representation, quantum product, or measurement result is included in the theorem family.
bibliographyReferencesDeclarations · lines 3207–3416
Open as its own pageBGP
C. Bär, N. Ginoux, and F. Pfäffle. Wave Equations on Lorentzian Manifolds and Quantization. ESI Lectures in Mathematics and Physics. European Mathematical Society, 2007. doi:\ 10.4171/037. arXiv:\ 0806.1036.
DG
W. Donnelly and S. B. Giddings. Diffeomorphism-invariant observables and their nonlocal algebra. Physical Review D 93, 024030 (2016); erratum, 94, 029903 (2016). doi:\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.024030. Version-specific formulas: arXiv:\ 1507.07921v3, Eqs. (52), (70), (73), and (74).
BFR
R. Brunetti, K. Fredenhagen, and K. Rejzner. Quantum gravity from the point of view of locally covariant quantum field theory. Communications in Mathematical Physics 345, 741–779 (2016). doi:\ 10.1007/s00220-016-2676-x. arXiv:\ 1306.1058.
Hack
T.-P. Hack. Quantization of the linearised Einstein–Klein–Gordon system on arbitrary backgrounds and the special case of perturbations in Inflation. Classical and Quantum Gravity 31, 215004 (2014). doi:\ 10.1088/0264-9381/31/21/215004. arXiv:\ 1403.3957.
Registry
N. Cheung. Enter Calculus Companion. Registered-manuscript index.
https://enter.grok.me/. The following items are undated, versioned companion manuscripts, not independently verified journal publications. Their identifiers and supplied statement locators are used for documentary comparison only.CheungII
N. Cheung. II,
.tex, version 1. Unpublished companion manuscript. Supplied comparison locator::certificate, finite contact-span certificate. Enter Calculus Companion.CheungIV
N. Cheung. IV,
.tex, version 1. Unpublished companion manuscript. Supplied comparison locator::model1, selected represented model. Enter Calculus Companion.CheungV
N. Cheung. V,
.tex, version 1. Unpublished companion manuscript. Supplied comparison locators::gaugeidentity,:defect, and:rawclassification. Enter Calculus Companion.CheungVI
N. Cheung. VI,
.tex, version 1. Unpublished companion manuscript. Source locators::descentand:gauge-action. Enter Calculus Companion.CheungVIIA
N. Cheung. VII-A,
-A.tex, version 1. Unpublished companion manuscript. Source locators::plateauand:nohigherrepair. Enter Calculus Companion.CheungXA
N. Cheung. X-A,
-A.tex, version 1. Unpublished companion manuscript. Source locator::coordinate, coordinate intertwining with the declared equations and data. Enter Calculus Companion.CheungXIA
N. Cheung. XI-A,
-A.tex, version 1. Unpublished companion manuscript. Source locator::empty, fixed-input invariant-jet obstruction. Enter Calculus Companion.CheungXIB
N. Cheung. XI-B,
-B.tex, version 1. Unpublished companion manuscript. Source locator: front-matter release distinguishing the gauge-fixed construction from repair of the invariant jet. Enter Calculus Companion.CheungXIIC
N. Cheung. XII-C,
-C.tex, version 1. Unpublished companion manuscript. Source locator::empty, recomputed compatibility for the selected action. Enter Calculus Companion.CheungXIID
N. Cheung. XII-D,
-D.tex, version 1. Unpublished companion manuscript. Source locator::response, local response construction and cutoff independence. Enter Calculus Companion.CheungXIIID
N. Cheung. XIII-D,
-D.tex, version 1. Unpublished companion manuscript. Source locator::triviality, causal tangency on its declared shell. Enter Calculus Companion.CheungXIVA
N. Cheung. XIV-A,
-A.tex, version 1. Unpublished companion manuscript. Source locator::relative, relative classical master equation. Enter Calculus Companion.CheungXIVB
N. Cheung. XIV-B,
-B.tex, version 1. Unpublished companion manuscript. Source locator::ghost, relative/free-shell ghost intersection. Enter Calculus Companion.CheungEm02E
N. Cheung. Em02-E,
02-E-v1.tex, version 1. Unpublished companion manuscript. Source locators::lapse,:release, and:background. Enter Calculus Companion.CheungEn01B
N. Cheung. En01-B,
01-B-v2.tex, version 2. Unpublished companion manuscript. Source locator::contrast, nuisance cancellation and robust margin. Enter Calculus Companion.CheungEn01C
N. Cheung. En01-C,
01-C.tex, version 1. Unpublished companion manuscript. Source locator::certificate, complete-record statistical certificate. Enter Calculus Companion.CheungXIVH
N. Cheung. XIV-H,
-H.tex, version 1. Unpublished companion manuscript. Source locators::H2and:release. Enter Calculus Companion.CheungXIVI
N. Cheung. XIV-I,
-I.tex, version 1. Unpublished companion manuscript. Source locators::I2,:I3, and:release. Enter Calculus Companion.CheungXIVJ
N. Cheung. XIV-J,
-J.tex, version 1. Unpublished companion manuscript. Source locators::descent,:reference,:J2,:release, and:noadmission. Enter Calculus Companion.