Manuscript Em03-D@1 · Em03-D-v1.tex · 450d878a
Em03-D A Local System–Probe Realization of a Hawking-Packet Observable Compact coupling, infrared-controlled bulk approximation, and a bounded Weyl effect
Constructs a compactly coupled scalar probe for one bounded outgoing s-wave packet quadrature effect on the Schwarzschild exterior. The coupling region grows with the spatial approximation parameter, and the apparatus uses a full angular shell. Complete stationary scattering, local Green operators, and the bulk Unruh state are declared external theorems. The bulk-to-packet approximation is constructed here, not imported. The inherited Unruh baseline is a comparison interface. Em03-A's packet mean does not construct the probe. Em03-B's apparatus and Em03-C's joint port are not premises, and this effect is not channel equivalence with Em03-C. It is not a pointlike detector, not a packet-number instrument, not coherent state transfer, not a collapse theorem, not backreaction, not a Page curve, not an island, and not quantum-gravitational evaporation. H2, I3, and J2 remain unresolved. Numerical execution is not reported as executed. It does not close O.1, discharge the XVI-N insertion, or admit the XIV-XV characteristic coefficient. XVI-P is registered and is not a premise. XV-B is not opened. No quantum coefficient is admitted. No compilation is asserted.
Front matter
abstractAbstractFront matter · lines 119–155
Open as its own pageWe construct a compactly coupled scalar probe scheme for one bounded outgoing Hawking-packet quadrature effect on the Schwarzschild exterior. The result is restricted to a massless s-wave packet and uses full angular-shell access.
Complete stationary scattering identifies the packet with a two-channel bulk coefficient. We construct real, compactly supported bulk tests approaching that coefficient in the Unruh covariance norm. A time-derivative filter permits a quantitative spatial Cauchy-data truncation without assuming that the thermal low-frequency weight is harmless. Separately, the explicit zero-energy s-wave solutions give a local infrared bound for arbitrary compact reduced tests.
A second massless scalar is coupled to the system by a smooth compact bilinear interaction. We calculate the exact induced Weyl effect and bound its deviation from the selected compact bulk test by a convergent advanced-Green-operator construction. Residual probe noise is retained. A finite-dimensional symplectic squeezing of the probe preparation suppresses that noise while keeping the probe readout a bounded effect; dividing an effect by its attenuation coefficient is not used.
The resulting expectation comparison is uniform on an explicitly defined class of regular system states with dominated second moments. It specializes to the inherited Unruh baseline and has a constructive resource-dependent accuracy schedule. The coupling region expands with the packet approximation, the readout test grows at weak coupling, and a conjugate probe variance diverges along the noise-suppression schedule.
This is a local field–probe observable correspondence, not a pointlike detector, a packet-number instrument, coherent state transfer, or channel equivalence with the effective apparatus of Em03-C. No collapse geometry, microscopic evaporation dynamics, or quantum-gravity correction is constructed.
Scope, target, and declared external inputs
sectionScope, target, and declared external inputsScope, target, and declared external inputs · lines 161–207
Open as its own pageThe construction follows
Its target is one effect, not the two-memory apparatus of Em03-C Em03C. For a normalized outgoing packet , set
Since the real part of a unitary has spectrum in ,
We prove a state-class comparison of the form
Here is a spatial approximation parameter and is a coupling parameter. The probe state, coupling profile, and readout test are specified below.
The scheme uses a full spherical shell. For each finite its coupling is compactly supported strictly outside the horizon. No fixed shell is claimed to realize arbitrary packet accuracy.
sectionWhat is inheritedScope, target, and declared external inputs › What is inherited · lines 208–229
Open as its own pageThe selected system state is the massless scalar Unruh prescription of Em03-A Em03A. Its horizon input is thermal in normalized Killing frequency, its infinity input is vacuum, and the two inputs are independent and centered quasifree. The outgoing packet mean is
The subscript denotes the s-wave greybody probability.
The one-mode Gaussian characteristic function used here follows from this prescription and the finite-mode construction in Em03-C. It does not require a density operator for the entire stationary continuum.
The effective Markov port, capture controls, and finite registers of Em03-B and Em03-C are not premises of the local construction.
sectionExternal theorems actually usedScope, target, and declared external inputs › External theorems actually used · lines 230–288
Open as its own pageFor the massless scalar on the Schwarzschild exterior, the past and future horizon and infinity channels give complete stationary scattering. In the s-wave reduction, the incoming generalized eigenfunctions define a unitary spectral transform
intertwining the radial operator with multiplication by . The flux-normalized stationary scattering matrix is unitary.
We use the complete wave-scattering result of Dimock Dimock, together with the ordinary one-dimensional spectral resolution for a real short-range potential DeiftTrubowitz. Baskin–Wang provides a complementary geometric account of the two radiation ends and their energy normalization BaskinWang. The exact mode and test normalizations used below are displayed explicitly.
A formally self-adjoint normally hyperbolic operator on a globally hyperbolic spacetime has the advanced and retarded Green operators and Cauchy evolution used below. Adding a smooth compactly supported symmetric zeroth-order matrix coupling gives a well-posed coupled theory and a symplectic scattering map. It induces the corresponding automorphism of the Weyl algebra.
The PDE input is the standard Green-operator and Cauchy theory BGP. The local system–probe construction and its scattering interpretation are those of Fewster–Verch FewsterVerch. Its Weyl-algebra version is described by Fewster–Jubb–Ruep FewsterJubbRuep. We give the particular test transformation and estimates required here.
The affine-horizon and Killing-infinity product prescription defines a quasifree Hadamard Unruh state on the Schwarzschild exterior.
This is the Dappiaggi–Moretti–Pinamonti construction DMP, already declared in Em03-A. Its global microlocal proof is not reproduced.
None of these external statements supplies the compact bulk-to-packet approximation proved in Section sec:packetbridge.
boundary. The manuscript supplies analytical constructions. Compilation, formal verification, numerical evaluation, calibration, and experimental realization are not asserted.
Geometry, signs, and canonical radiation coordinates
sectionThe exterior and dimensionless estimatesGeometry, signs, and canonical radiation coordinates › The exterior and dimensionless estimates · lines 293–342
Open as its own pageIn physical units,
The time generator is normalized at infinity.
For the PDE estimates we measure lengths in units of :
The packet rescales as
This preserves both packet normalization and its annihilator. After this paragraph, tildes are suppressed:
The occupation integrals are unchanged by the rescaling. All constants in the estimates are dimensionless in this convention.
The physical coupling associated with a dimensionless profile is . A dimensionless scalar smearing is converted to its physical smearing with the corresponding factor . Thus the profile choices below do not equate quantities of different physical dimensions.
The exterior is globally hyperbolic, with Cauchy surfaces. Indeed, in the conformally related optical metric, a causal curve has . On every bounded -interval the angular optical geometry is regular and compact. An inextendible causal curve cannot escape the spatial geometry at finite , and therefore crosses every time slice once.
sectionWave operator and s-wave reductionGeometry, signs, and canonical radiation coordinates › Wave operator and s-wave reduction · Em03-D@1#eq:bulkrepresentative · lines 343–401
Open as its own pageWe use
For both the real system field and real probe field , the free action is
Both fields are massless.
Let . Writing
in the selected angular sector gives
For a real reduced test , define its bulk representative
Then
This follows from . Compact reduced support gives compact bulk support outside the horizon.
The causal propagator convention is
It is consistent with
For , the retarded solution has the usual positive sine kernel. The advanced-minus-retarded propagator has the corresponding negative sine kernel.
sectionIncoming modes and the weighted coefficient spaceGeometry, signs, and canonical radiation coordinates › Incoming modes and the weighted coefficient space · Em03-D@1#eq:testcoefficient, Em03-D@1#eq:Weyl, Em03-D@1#eq:Unruhnorm · lines 402–485
Open as its own pageLet at and at be Jost solutions. Define
These are the horizon-incident and infinity-incident modes. The infinity-incident mode has an outgoing infinity reflection amplitude denoted .
The incoming spectral transform is
It is understood in its unitary extension.
The canonical field expansion is
Consequently a compact real reduced test has coefficient
so that
Annihilators are conjugate-linear in their tests:
Define the real symplectic form and Weyl convention by
The Unruh second-moment norm is
For real linear observables,
The norm dominates the ordinary two-channel norm.
An explicit local infrared and covariance estimate
sectionAn explicit local infrared and covariance estimateAn explicit local infrared and covariance estimate · lines 487–492
Open as its own pageThis section is specific to the s-wave potential. No higher-angular threshold estimate is silently imported.
lemmaLemma: Zero-energy normalizationAn explicit local infrared and covariance estimate · Em03-D@1#lem:threshold · proof attached · lines 493–535
Open as its own pageThe potential is smooth, nonnegative, and satisfies
Its zero-energy Jost solutions are
and
There is an for which
Proof. Since ,
Near the horizon, grows logarithmically in ; at infinity, . These facts prove the first-moment bound.
Substitution in verifies the two solutions. They tend to one at their respective normalization ends. Using and gives their Wronskian .
The Jost Volterra equations have the zero-frequency kernel in the right equation and its left-end analogue. The first-moment bound gives convergent series and continuity at , including derivatives on compact -sets. The nonzero Wronskian therefore gives the final assertion.
sectionAn explicit local infrared and covariance estimateAn explicit local infrared and covariance estimate · Em03-D@1#eq:Jostconstant · lines 535–548
Open as its own pageChoose one such . For , set
lemmaLemma: Compact-region mode boundAn explicit local infrared and covariance estimate · Em03-D@1#lem:modebound · proof attached · lines 549–572
Open as its own pageFor , , and ,
Proof. For , use in the Jost Volterra series. It gives on the compact region. Together with , this proves the low-frequency bound.
For , the Volterra series gives
Current conservation gives . This proves the remaining bound.
sectionAn explicit local infrared and covariance estimateAn explicit local infrared and covariance estimate · Em03-D@1#eq:compactcovariancebound · lines 572–588
Open as its own pageFor a reduced test supported at , define
The norms are over .
propositionProposition: Explicit compact-test covariance boundAn explicit local infrared and covariance estimate · Em03-D@1#prop:compactcovariance · proof attached · lines 589–616
Open as its own pageEvery compact smooth real reduced test satisfies
In particular, its thermal infrared integral is finite.
Proof. At , use (eq:testcoefficient) and Lemma lem:modebound:
At , integrate once by parts in :
Use for both channel bounds. Summing the two channel estimates and performing the elementary integrals gives (eq:compactcovariancebound).
sectionAn explicit local infrared and covariance estimateAn explicit local infrared and covariance estimate · lines 616–622
Open as its own pageThis local threshold calculation is not a replacement of unselected radiation by vacuum. Both incoming channels appear in the estimate, with the actual horizon thermal weight.
The outgoing target and a controlled state class
sectionThe outgoing target and a controlled state classThe outgoing target and a controlled state class · Em03-D@1#eq:packetcoefficient, Em03-D@1#eq:Hawkingbaseline · lines 624–667
Open as its own pageFix a normalized
Stationary scattering gives
Thus
This is the coefficient of the outgoing scattering observable in the bulk incoming coordinates. It is not a finite-radius pointwise limit of an unsmeared quantum field.
Unitarity gives
Consequently
There is no packet-count rate factor in this formula.
definitionDefinition: Second-moment-dominated system statesThe outgoing target and a controlled state class · Em03-D@1#def:stateclass · lines 668–678
Open as its own pageFor , let consist of normal states in the regular Unruh representation of the completed two-channel Weyl algebra for which
on its real weighted coefficient domain. The second moment includes any nonzero mean.
sectionThe outgoing target and a controlled state classThe outgoing target and a controlled state class · lines 678–688
Open as its own pageThe baseline belongs to . The class is not a statement about all Hadamard states.
It is nontrivial beyond the baseline. A Weyl displacement by changes by a scalar of magnitude . The displaced Unruh state therefore belongs to .
lemmaLemma: Weyl expectation comparisonThe outgoing target and a controlled state class · Em03-D@1#lem:Weylcomparison, Em03-D@1#eq:effectcomparison · proof attached · lines 689–727
Open as its own pageFor and weighted coefficients ,
In particular,
Proof. Put . The Weyl relation expresses as times a scalar phase of angle of magnitude . Cauchy–Schwarz for the state and spectral calculus give
The phase costs at most . This proves the first inequality. Since
taking real parts and dividing by two proves the second.
sectionThe outgoing target and a controlled state classThe outgoing target and a controlled state class · lines 727–732
Open as its own pageThe estimate uses exact Weyl relations rather than a formal unbounded-operator Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff manipulation.
Bridge A: compact bulk tests approaching the packet
sectionReal Cauchy data for a chosen coefficientBridge A: compact bulk tests approaching the packet › Real Cauchy data for a chosen coefficient · Em03-D@1#eq:Cauchycoefficient, Em03-D@1#eq:targetCauchydata · lines 737–780
Open as its own pageFor real Cauchy data , define the linear observable
Its incoming coefficient is
For compact smooth data this follows directly from the canonical field expansion. Its indicated spectral extensions follow by continuity on their moment domains.
Let
It is an antiunitary involution commuting with real functions of . It incorporates the reality convention of the incoming scattering modes; componentwise conjugation must not be substituted for it.
Set
and define
These give real , satisfy , and have spectral support in the compact positive band. They belong to every integer Sobolev space, by spectral functional calculus and elliptic regularity for .
sectionCompact Cauchy truncation and time-slice testBridge A: compact bulk tests approaching the packet › Compact Cauchy truncation and time-slice test · Em03-D@1#eq:compactpackettest · lines 781–810
Open as its own pageChoose a real , equal to one on . For , put
Let solve
Choose a smooth time function , equal to zero for and one for , with . Define
Because
the reduced test is smooth and compact, with
The full support includes the angular sphere .
lemmaLemma: Exact time-slice identity and derivative filterBridge A: compact bulk tests approaching the packet › Compact Cauchy truncation and time-slice test · Em03-D@1#lem:timeslice, Em03-D@1#eq:kR · proof attached · lines 811–840
Open as its own pageThe reduced field observable of is . The coefficient of is
The time-slice identity is exact for every .
Proof. Pair the test with a homogeneous field solution and integrate the term once by parts:
The integrated symplectic pairing is constant in time. Since , it equals .
Alternatively the advanced and retarded solutions of are and , respectively, confirming the sign convention. In (eq:testcoefficient), applying to the test multiplies its coefficient by . This proves (eq:kR).
sectionCompact Cauchy truncation and time-slice testBridge A: compact bulk tests approaching the packet › Compact Cauchy truncation and time-slice test · lines 840–846
Open as its own pageThe time filter is not an assertion that a compact time window exactly selects a band-limited packet. It first acts on a band-limited auxiliary coefficient , then controls the low-frequency leakage caused by spatial Cauchy truncation.
sectionExplicit packet errorBridge A: compact bulk tests approaching the packet › Explicit packet error · Em03-D@1#eq:packeterror, Em03-D@1#eq:ordinarytailbound · lines 847–886
Open as its own pageWrite
Define
All fractional powers are those of the positive self-adjoint radial operator.
For a bound using only ordinary spatial derivatives, put
Then
theoremTheorem: Quantitative bulk-to-packet bridgeBridge A: compact bulk tests approaching the packet › Explicit packet error · Em03-D@1#thm:packetbridge, Em03-D@1#eq:packetbridge · proof attached · lines 887–954
Open as its own pageThe compact tests (eq:compactpackettest) satisfy
For every ,
Proof. From (eq:Cauchycoefficient),
Use
and . The resulting integral is bounded by
Spectral unitarity gives precisely (eq:packeterror).
For , and . Also
These facts prove (eq:ordinarytailbound).
Multiplication by tends to the identity in every integer Sobolev norm on fixed Sobolev functions. This follows from the derivative tails and the bounds . In particular, in and in . The potential and its required derivatives are bounded, so .
Finally, in the common regular representation. Apply Lemma lem:Weylcomparison with .
sectionExplicit packet errorBridge A: compact bulk tests approaching the packet › Explicit packet error · lines 954–965
Open as its own pageThis proves the packet bridge from bulk Cauchy evolution and complete scattering. It does not assume the effective temporal port of Em03-C.
The spatial truncation accounts for both radiation ends. Its support moves toward spatial infinity and toward the horizon as increases. It is therefore not a fixed finite-radius, outgoing-only detector construction.
Bridge B: one compact local scalar coupling
sectionBridge B: one compact local scalar couplingBridge B: one compact local scalar coupling · lines 967–975
Open as its own pageFix and abbreviate
sectionProbe solution and future processing testBridge B: one compact local scalar coupling › Probe solution and future processing test · lines 976–1007
Open as its own pageChoose a spacelike-compact free probe solution equal to the constant solution on a neighborhood of . Such a solution can be constructed explicitly.
At , prescribe physical probe Cauchy position equal to one on the spatial projection of at that time, extend it smoothly with compact radial support, and prescribe zero velocity. The constant function solves . Finite propagation and Cauchy uniqueness imply equality with one on .
Write
Thus on .
Choose equal to zero for and one for , and put
This is a real compact test in the future processing slab. Its advanced solution satisfies
and therefore equals one on .
assumptionModel specification: Local interaction and bounded probe effectBridge B: one compact local scalar coupling › Probe solution and future processing test · Em03-D@1#spec:local, Em03-D@1#eq:localaction, Em03-D@1#eq:probeeffect · lines 1008–1037
Open as its own pageLet
The interaction is
The coupled equations are
The postinteraction probe effect is
The complementary outcome is . Both outcomes are retained.
sectionProbe solution and future processing testBridge B: one compact local scalar coupling › Probe solution and future processing test · lines 1037–1046
Open as its own pageThe profile is smooth, compact, and spherically symmetric. All angular sectors decouple in the coupled equations. The selected probe test is an s-wave test, so it induces only the selected system angular sector.
The readout effect itself is a specified final probe operation. The manuscript does not construct its laboratory electronics.
sectionExact scattering testsBridge B: one compact local scalar coupling › Exact scattering tests · Em03-D@1#eq:exactscatteredtests · lines 1047–1061
Open as its own pageLet
Define
theoremTheorem: Exact induced Weyl effectBridge B: one compact local scalar coupling › Exact scattering tests · Em03-D@1#thm:induced, Em03-D@1#eq:inducedeffect · proof attached · lines 1062–1124
Open as its own pageThe local scattering morphism obeys
For a centered quasifree probe state with variance convention
the induced effect is
Its expectation in every system state is
The induced system test is compactly supported in .
Proof. For future-supported free test vectors , comparison of advanced coupled and uncoupled solutions gives the test transformation
Equivalently, pair the coupled solution with its advanced test solution and use Green's identity in an early Cauchy region, where both theories agree. The test classes are those modulo the respective wave operators.
The transformation preserves the symplectic form: compare the conserved coupled symplectic current on past and future Cauchy surfaces outside . It therefore gives the Weyl scattering morphism . This is the local linear scattering construction stated in Section sec:scope.
Applying it to yields (eq:exactscatteredtests). System and probe Weyl operators belong to separate tensor factors, so no additional mixed phase appears. Apply , then take the real part. Since is real and nonnegative, this gives (eq:inducedeffect). Multiplication by gives the support assertion.
sectionExact scattering testsBridge B: one compact local scalar coupling › Exact scattering tests · lines 1124–1130
Open as its own pageThis is an equality of bounded effects in a Weyl-algebra quantization. The unbounded polynomial field algebra alone would not supply the effect (eq:probeeffect).
A quantitative transfer estimate from advanced evolution
sectionReduced advanced operator and explicit constantsA quantitative transfer estimate from advanced evolution › Reduced advanced operator and explicit constants · lines 1135–1182
Open as its own pageThe s-wave coupled operator is
In particular, because and ,
Here the first in is the bulk test, while is the metric coefficient.
Work on the finite time interval
For a reduced function , define
Let be the reduced free advanced Green operator, and define
Its source is compactly supported inside the coupling slab.
The following deliberately conservative constants suffice:
lemmaLemma: Advanced energy estimateA quantitative transfer estimate from advanced evolution › Reduced advanced operator and explicit constants · Em03-D@1#lem:energy · proof attached · lines 1183–1217
Open as its own pageThe operator satisfies
Proof. For a free inhomogeneous solution with zero final data, differentiate the sum of energies in the definition of . Spatial integration by parts cancels the principal wave terms. The remaining potential and commutator terms contain only . Cauchy–Schwarz and the product rule give
with the reversed-time version for advanced evolution. The stated dominates all the finite product-rule coefficients.
The spatial product estimate
follows by expanding the derivatives through order two. Backward Gronwall inequality on gives
sectionReduced advanced operator and explicit constantsA quantitative transfer estimate from advanced evolution › Reduced advanced operator and explicit constants · lines 1217–1226
Open as its own pageLet . It equals on and has finite norm. Put
Assume .
propositionProposition: Exact convergent transfer formulaA quantitative transfer estimate from advanced evolution › Reduced advanced operator and explicit constants · Em03-D@1#prop:Neumann, Em03-D@1#eq:residualprobe · proof attached · lines 1227–1274
Open as its own pageThe reduced advanced coupled solution is
Hence the reduced system test is
where
The reduced residual probe test is
Moreover,
Proof. The two advanced equations give
Substitution gives the displayed inverse. Lemma lem:energy proves convergence in . The resulting solution has zero final data and satisfies the coupled equation. Cauchy uniqueness identifies it with the exact coupled advanced solution; smooth-source regularity makes it smooth. The test formulas and remainder estimate follow by substitution.
sectionConversion to the Unruh moment topologyA quantitative transfer estimate from advanced evolution › Conversion to the Unruh moment topology · Em03-D@1#eq:transferconstant · lines 1276–1295
Open as its own pageAbbreviate the two scalar coefficients in (eq:compactcovariancebound) by
Choose a rectangular coupling support bound , and let . Put
lemmaLemma: Product covariance estimateA quantitative transfer estimate from advanced evolution › Conversion to the Unruh moment topology · Em03-D@1#lem:productbound · proof attached · lines 1296–1318
Open as its own pageFor a smooth of finite norm,
Proof. The one-dimensional Sobolev inequality gives, with a conservative constant,
Therefore
Apply Proposition prop:compactcovariance.
theoremTheorem: Quantitative compact-observable transferA quantitative transfer estimate from advanced evolution › Conversion to the Unruh moment topology · Em03-D@1#thm:transfer, Em03-D@1#eq:transfererror · proof attached · lines 1320–1346
Open as its own pageThe exact induced system test satisfies
The residual probe correction satisfies
Proof. Apply Lemma lem:productbound to the two functions in Proposition prop:Neumann, and use .
sectionConversion to the Unruh moment topologyA quantitative transfer estimate from advanced evolution › Conversion to the Unruh moment topology · lines 1346–1352
Open as its own pageAll constants here are fixed by the packet-derived compact test, the chosen finite processing slab, and the radial Green problem. The estimate is not an unspecified calibration error.
Probe preparation, noise, and squeezing cost
sectionWhy fixed probe noise is not negligibleProbe preparation, noise, and squeezing cost › Why fixed probe noise is not negligible · lines 1357–1388
Open as its own pagePrepare a reference probe in an independent copy of the bulk Unruh state. This is a centered regular quasifree Hadamard state of the same massless probe equation. For its real s-wave tests,
The probe reference could be replaced by another explicitly controlled covariance. It must not be replaced by a formal “zero-noise” state.
The leading residual test in (eq:residualprobe) is . Since , , and
for fixed . Thus a fixed reference preparation gives , not one. Its induced effect tends toward .
Dividing the measured Weyl observable by would in general destroy the effect bound. The following construction suppresses noise through the preparation instead.
sectionAn exact finite-plane squeezeProbe preparation, noise, and squeezing cost › An exact finite-plane squeeze · Em03-D@1#eq:squeeze · lines 1389–1435
Open as its own pageThe free probe test quotient has symplectic form
Choose a real compact s-wave test for which
Such a test exists by nondegeneracy of the free scalar symplectic space. It can also be constructed from compact Cauchy data symplectically paired with the nonzero solution , followed by the time-slice construction.
For sufficiently small , define
Then .
Let be the symplectic projection onto their real plane:
Define a symplectic map on the probe test quotient by
It scales by , scales by , and fixes the symplectic orthogonal complement.
Define the independently prepared probe state by
propositionProposition: Admissible squeezed preparationProbe preparation, noise, and squeezing cost › An exact finite-plane squeeze · Em03-D@1#prop:squeezedstate, Em03-D@1#eq:squeezedvariance · proof attached · lines 1436–1467
Open as its own pageThe state is centered, regular, quasifree, and Hadamard for every allowed finite . Its residual variance is
Proof. The scaling on a Darboux plane and identity on its symplectic complement preserve the symplectic form. Hence is a Weyl automorphism. Pullback of the reference state proves positivity and quasifreeness. Its covariance remains continuous on compact test spaces, so regularity is preserved.
The difference between the reference and transformed two-point distributions is a finite sum of products of smooth free solutions associated with and their contractions against the reference covariance. For a Hadamard bisolution, smearing one variable with a smooth compact test gives a smooth solution in the other variable. The covariance difference is therefore smooth. The Hadamard singularity is unchanged.
Finally , which proves (eq:squeezedvariance).
sectionAn exact finite-plane squeezeProbe preparation, noise, and squeezing cost › An exact finite-plane squeeze · lines 1467–1471
Open as its own pageThis is an explicitly declared preparation. A local cooling or squeezing protocol that creates it is not constructed.
sectionA numerical form of the noise boundProbe preparation, noise, and squeezing cost › A numerical form of the noise bound · Em03-D@1#eq:noisebound · lines 1472–1514
Open as its own pageChoose containing the spatial support of , and set
For , put
Then
For , define
It follows that
The second bound uses .
The normalization of is also quantitatively controlled. Put
The denominator cannot vanish if
because the symplectic form is bounded by twice the ordinary coefficient norms, which are dominated by the reference norms.
propositionProposition: Required conjugate noise growthProbe preparation, noise, and squeezing cost › A numerical form of the noise bound · Em03-D@1#prop:effort · proof attached · lines 1515–1532
Open as its own pageThe conjugate probe quadrature obeys
The squeezing parameter has magnitude , and the processing test is .
Proof. The two quadratures have commutator . The uncertainty inequality gives the variance product at least . Apply (eq:noisebound). The remaining assertions are the two scalings in (eq:squeeze) and (eq:probeeffect).
sectionA numerical form of the noise boundProbe preparation, noise, and squeezing cost › A numerical form of the noise bound · lines 1532–1538
Open as its own pageNoise suppression therefore has a divergent preparation effort along the weak-coupling schedule. No finite-energy or thermodynamic optimum is asserted.
The local Hawking-packet correspondence theorem
theoremTheorem: Quantitative local packet-effect correspondenceThe local Hawking-packet correspondence theorem · Em03-D@1#thm:main, Em03-D@1#eq:mainbound, Em03-D@1#eq:simplifiedmain · proof attached · lines 1543–1615
Open as its own pageFix the normalized outgoing s-wave packet , the nonzero quadrature parameter , and . Use the compact tests of Section sec:packetbridge, the local coupling and future probe effect of Specification spec:local, and the independent preparation of Section sec:probe.
For every , and every allowed ,
Thus one may take
For and , define
Then the completely displayed upper bound is
The additional smallness condition ensuring the definition of is retained.
Proof. The exact induced effect is (eq:inducedeffect). Replacing by one changes its expectation by at most .
The coefficient of its system Weyl operator is . Theorems thm:packetbridge and thm:transfer give
Apply Lemma lem:Weylcomparison directly with target , and then cap the difference of two effect expectations at one. This proves (eq:mainbound).
When , . Equation (eq:noisebound) supplies the probe term, proving (eq:simplifiedmain).
corollaryCorollary: Inherited Hawking predictionThe local Hawking-packet correspondence theorem · Em03-D@1#cor:baseline · proof attached · lines 1617–1644
Open as its own pageIn the Unruh system state,
with .
The exact local prediction is
Proof. Use (eq:Hawkingbaseline) and Theorem thm:main. The exact formula follows by applying the Unruh characteristic function to (eq:inducedeffect).
sectionThe local Hawking-packet correspondence theoremThe local Hawking-packet correspondence theorem · lines 1644–1651
Open as its own pageThe main theorem is stronger than agreement in one calibrated state: it compares a fixed induced effect with the target on the named class . It remains weaker than an operator-norm or unrestricted channel comparison.
theoremTheorem: Resource-dependent tolerance scheduleThe local Hawking-packet correspondence theorem › Constructive accuracy schedule · Em03-D@1#thm:tolerance · proof attached · lines 1654–1689
Open as its own pageFix and a desired expectation tolerance . Within the family permitting the stated growing shells, compact couplings, future tests, and squeezed probe preparations, finite parameters meeting exist.
A sufficient choice is:
choose a finite integer with ;
for that fixed , choose satisfying
and the nonzero-denominator condition for .
Proof. Theorem thm:packetbridge proves . The ordinary derivative integrals in (eq:ordinarytailbound) provide a terminating search criterion on increasing integer .
For fixed , all displayed Green, support, and covariance constants are finite. The inequalities in the second step are therefore satisfied by sufficiently small positive . Equation (eq:simplifiedmain) proves the result.
sectionConstructive accuracy scheduleThe local Hawking-packet correspondence theorem › Constructive accuracy schedule · lines 1689–1700
Open as its own pageNo polynomial rate in is claimed. The spatial derivative tails are actual packet-dependent quantities. The theorem proves existence of finite parameters at every fixed tolerance, while explicitly allowing resources to grow.
It does not prove arbitrary accuracy in a fixed coupling zone, with bounded squeezing, bounded readout-test size, or fixed laboratory hardware.
A worked packet family and the apparatus resource ledger
sectionOne specified smooth packetA worked packet family and the apparatus resource ledger › One specified smooth packet · lines 1705–1758
Open as its own pageChoose , and define
where is its squared integral before normalization. This is a real normalized smooth compact-band packet.
For a chosen , the construction consists of:
solve the same s-wave radial scattering equation used for ;
form and the real spectral Cauchy data (eq:targetCauchydata);
calculate the spatial derivative-tail certificate (eq:ordinarytailbound);
form , its bulk representative, the coupling , and the explicitly time-sliced probe test;
calculate the constants ;
choose by Theorem thm:tolerance and prepare .
These are analytical specifications. Numerical execution of this list is not asserted.
The inherited mean is
It determines the target probability in (eq:Hawkingbaseline); no numerical greybody table is inserted.
For , that target probability lies strictly between and . Choosing an error smaller than half its distance from gives a nontrivial probability certificate rather than the vacuous upper bound one.
sectionAccess and effortA worked packet family and the apparatus resource ledger › Access and effort · lines 1759–1856
Open as its own page{}1.13
Resource Declared quantity and boundary Resource Declared quantity and boundary Geometry and angular access The right Schwarzschild exterior; the full angular sphere. The interaction is not pointlike and is not a restricted angular-patch detector. Coupling support A compact subset of , times . Its inner radius is strictly greater than the horizon radius for every finite . Spatial accuracy The explicit spectral or ordinary derivative tails . Increasing enlarges access toward both radiation ends. Coupling amplitude and derivatives . For every fixed derivative order, in the stated dimensionless coordinates. Physical values require the displayed length conversion. Probe species One additional real massless scalar on the same exterior. The use of the constant free solution is specific to this declared mass choice. Probe initial data Compact Cauchy data equal to the constant solution on the causal predecessor of the coupling zone. The initial support and subsequent processing support grow with the coupling zone. Processing test The compact future test . Its test seminorms grow as for fixed . Probe covariance The independent reference Unruh covariance, followed by the exact finite-plane squeeze (eq:squeeze). The residual variance is bounded by . Conjugate preparation effort The squeezing magnitude is . A canonically conjugate variance is at least . No bounded-effort limit is claimed. Final measurement The two effects . Their probabilities are well defined and complete. A laboratory implementation of the final probe POVM is a separate obligation. Clock Normalized asymptotic Killing time. A static proper-time implementation at radius must convert by . Energy and preparation work No evaluated cooling work, squeezing energy, or optimal reset cost is supplied. Hadamard regularity is not a bound on preparation resources. Repeated trials Fresh independent system and probe preparations are additional assumptions if independent-trial statistics are used. In dimensionless tortoise coordinates, as . Thus the inner-shell access can approach the horizon exponentially in the coordinate support parameter. The construction must not be described as maintaining a fixed proper distance from the horizon.
Complete binary records and relation to Em03-C
sectionComplete binary records and relation to Em03-CComplete binary records and relation to Em03-C · lines 1858–1887
Open as its own pageThe two probe effects define a binary law
The ideal binary target has . For binary laws,
This is an effect and probability comparison. It does not identify the conditional postmeasurement system state with the conditional output of an Em03-C instrument.
If a final laboratory readout has a separately justified binary complete-law error , retaining all declared failures in a common output alphabet, then classical contraction and the triangle inequality add that error. Such a readout error is not supplied by local field scattering alone.
corollaryCorollary: Local bounded-departure testComplete binary records and relation to Em03-C · Em03-D@1#cor:departure · proof attached · lines 1888–1907
Open as its own pageLet two system states belong to the named controlled class, with ideal packet-effect gap
Using the same declared local scheme, with its corresponding bounds , their local binary probability gap is at least
Proof. Apply Theorem thm:main to each state and use the reverse triangle inequality.
sectionComplete binary records and relation to Em03-CComplete binary records and relation to Em03-C · lines 1907–1925
Open as its own pageFor independent repeated preparations, a binary sample mean has
This follows by the exponential-moment bound for independent variables in , followed by Markov inequality. Thus the confidence interval for the ideal packet probability enlarges by . Independence of repeated preparations is not inferred from the one-shot construction.
The outcome says whether a specified bounded exterior observable departs from its stated baseline. It does not identify the cause as quantum gravity, microscopic information recovery, or evaporation.
Repairs to the proposed proof architecture
sectionRepairs to the proposed proof architectureRepairs to the proposed proof architecture · lines 1927–1996
Open as its own pageA bounded effect requires the Weyl algebra. The polynomial scalar field algebra is not used as though it contained the requested nontrivial effects.
The two signs are fixed together. With , the interaction gives the positive off-diagonal operator entries. The causal propagator is advanced minus retarded, and the time-slice pairing is .
The packet is identified in the bulk before coupling. The coefficient , the real Cauchy data, and are constructed using complete stationary scattering. Em03-C's effective port is not used to prove the bulk-to-radiation identification.
A derivative filter is needed for the truncation estimate. Energy completeness alone would not control the covariance weight. The filtered Cauchy construction supplies the powers of used in (eq:packeterror).
Generic compact transfer errors need their own infrared bound. They are not assumed to retain the target's derivative filter. The s-wave zero-energy calculation proves their finite covariance through Proposition prop:compactcovariance.
The time-slice parameter is not a packet-time cutoff. Its identity is exact. The actual approximation is spatial Cauchy truncation of a backward-continued outgoing packet.
Residual probe noise remains in the induced effect. Weak coupling with a fixed probe state would suppress the signal. The squeezed preparation is explicit and its resource growth is proved.
No effect is divided by an attenuation factor. The final probe observable stays between zero and one. This differs from reconstructing a general Weyl element by unbounded amplification of its measurement estimator.
Full-shell access is a real restriction. The proof does not establish a pointlike or finite angular-patch scheme. Its increasing coupling region includes access near both spatial ends.
State-class convergence is not operator-norm convergence. The error uses a common regular representation and controlled second moments. It is not a uniform bound over all states.
One observable is not a transfer channel. No number distribution, coherent oscillator extraction, joint-packet tomography, or reference-stable channel equivalence with Em03-C is proved.
The probe measurement chain has a declared endpoint. A local bilinear interaction and induced effect are constructed. An engineering realization of the final probe POVM and of its squeezed preparation remains separate.
Remaining physical programmes and release
sectionRemaining physical programmes and releaseRemaining physical programmes and release · lines 1998–2023
Open as its own pageThe present construction closes one narrow local-observable bridge. The following remain outside it:
a fixed-zone or restricted-angular-access approximation;
a probe-preparation protocol with bounded energy and specified laboratory controls;
exact or approximate packet-number detection;
a local instrument comparison retaining quantum outputs and external references;
a collapse geometry and a noncompact late-time packet limit;
backreaction or a dynamical mass-loss law;
an interacting matter or quantum-gravity correction to the same observable;
microscopic input-dependent evaporation and recovery.
The supplied internal documentary accounts do not alter these proof obligations. This local free-field calculation does not close O.1, discharge a separate XIV–XV characteristic-product problem, or admit an inherited quantum-gravitational coefficient. No manuscript registry or corpus coverage claim is used as a mathematical premise.
theoremTheorem: Em03-D analytical releaseRemaining physical programmes and release · Em03-D@1#thm:release · proof attached · lines 2024–2085
Open as its own pageFor one normalized positive-frequency massless s-wave packet on the Schwarzschild exterior:
its bounded quadrature effect and inherited Unruh probability are identified;
real compact bulk tests converge to its scattering coefficient with the explicit covariance error (eq:packeterror);
a smooth compact local bilinear scalar coupling and future probe effect have the exact induced form (eq:inducedeffect);
the advanced evolution gives the explicit compact-observable transfer error (eq:transfererror);
a specified independent quasifree Hadamard probe preparation suppresses residual noise with (eq:noisebound), while its conjugate variance and readout-test effort grow as stated;
these constructions prove the state-class expectation comparison (eq:mainbound) and the finite resource-dependent schedule of Theorem thm:tolerance.
The construction uses full angular-shell access and a coupling zone that may grow with accuracy. Complete stationary scattering, standard local Green/scattering theory, and the bulk Unruh-state identification are the declared external inputs.
The release is a local system–probe realization of one bounded packet-observable comparison. It is not a pointlike detector, a packet-number instrument, coherent state transfer, or equivalence with Em03-C's effective Markov apparatus. No collapse-packet theorem or quantum-gravitational evaporation result is established.
Proof. Equation (eq:packetcoefficient) and Corollary cor:baseline establish (i). Theorem thm:packetbridge proves (ii), using its displayed Cauchy and spectral constructions. Specification spec:local and Theorem thm:induced prove (iii). Proposition prop:Neumann and Theorem thm:transfer prove (iv). Propositions prop:squeezedstate and prop:effort, together with (eq:noisebound), prove (v). Theorems thm:main and thm:tolerance prove (vi).
The support, species, state-class, and external-theorem restrictions are retained throughout. No excluded dynamical, instrument-level, or laboratory construction appears in these proofs.
sectionRemaining physical programmes and releaseRemaining physical programmes and release · lines 2085–2096
Open as its own pagescope statement. Em03-D constructs a compactly coupled local scalar probe scheme whose induced bounded effect approximates one specified outgoing Hawking-packet quadrature effect, with an explicit state-class error bound. The approximation uses growing full-shell access, a scaled processing test, and a specified squeezed probe state. It does not establish packet-number detection, coherent state transfer, or channel equivalence with the apparatus of Em03-C.
Declarations
sectionDeclarationsDeclarations · lines 2097–2116
Open as its own pageand verification availability. The analytical specifications and estimates are contained in this source. No numerical scattering table, executed resource schedule, compilation record, formal proof certificate, experimental calibration, or apparatus demonstration is supplied.
. The Unruh radiation prescription is inherited from the supplied Em03-A source, and the one-mode target is consistent with the supplied Em03-C source. Complete stationary scattering, local linear system–probe scattering, and Hadamard state existence are declared external inputs. The filtered compact bulk approximation, particular constant-solution probe matching, quantitative estimates, and effect-preserving noise-suppression schedule are the constructions analyzed here.
bibliographyReferencesDeclarations · lines 2117–2211
Open as its own pageEm03A
N. Cheung, Em03-A: A Fixed-Background Hawking Emission Theorem, version 1, 8 October 2026. Supplied source
03-A-v1.tex. Used for the named scalar model, incoming Unruh prescription, stationary scattering conventions, and packet occupation law. Its separate compact-test peeling theorem is not a collapse packet premise of this manuscript.Em03C
N. Cheung, Em03-C: Joint Hawking-Packet Correlations and Certified Tests of Semiclassical Departures, version 1, 8 October 2026. Supplied source
03-C.tex. Finite-mode Gaussian and bounded-observable context. The effective capture and register apparatus is not imported as a local-field realization.Dimock
J. Dimock, Scattering for the wave equation on the Schwarzschild metric, General Relativity and Gravitation 17 (1985), 353–369. doi:10.1007/BF00759679. Complete classical wave scattering and its horizon/infinity channels.
DeiftTrubowitz
P. Deift and E. Trubowitz, Inverse scattering on the line, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 32 (1979), 121–251. doi:10.1002/cpa.3160320202. One-dimensional short-range Jost and spectral-scattering framework used for the stated radial transform.
BaskinWang
D. Baskin and F. Wang, Radiation fields on Schwarzschild spacetime, Communications in Mathematical Physics 331 (2014), 477–506. arXiv:1305.5273. Geometric radiation-field regularity, the two radiation ends, and energy normalization. Its energy theorem is not substituted for the weighted quantum covariance estimate proved here.
BGP
C. Bär, N. Ginoux, and F. Pfäffle, Wave Equations on Lorentzian Manifolds and Quantization, ESI Lectures in Mathematics and Physics, European Mathematical Society, 2007. arXiv:0806.1036. Normally hyperbolic Cauchy problems, Green operators, causal support, and scalar quantization.
FewsterVerch
C. J. Fewster and R. Verch, Quantum fields and local measurements, Communications in Mathematical Physics 378 (2020), 851–899. arXiv:1810.06512. doi:10.1007/s00220-020-03800-6. General induced-observable framework and the compact bilinear scalar coupling; in particular the advanced scattering-test transformation in the linear model.
FewsterJubbRuep
C. J. Fewster, I. Jubb, and M. H. Ruep, Asymptotic measurement schemes for every observable of a quantum field theory, Annales Henri Poincaré 24 (2023), 1137–1184. arXiv:2203.09529. doi:10.1007/s00023-022-01239-0. Compact local measurement constructions and the Weyl-algebra scattering and induced-observable formulas. Its local asymptotic theorem is not used as an unproved outgoing-packet approximation.
DMP
C. Dappiaggi, V. Moretti, and N. Pinamonti, Rigorous construction and Hadamard property of the Unruh state in Schwarzschild spacetime, Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 15 (2011), 355–447. arXiv:0907.1034. Bulk Unruh-state construction and Hadamard property. The global microlocal proof remains an external input.