Manuscript Hawk05-B@1 · Hawk05-B.tex · f2e5d4f5
Hawk05-B A Finite Page-Curve Derivation under the Enter Discipline Haar-scrambled coherent radiation, destructive records, and the limits of gravitational identification
Specifies version 1 of a finite Haar-scrambled emission model under the Enter discipline, not a solution of black-hole evaporation. The title page names Ngo Cheung. thm:page derives the exact finite Page-Sen mean for one fixed pure input independent of one Haar unitary. thm:uniform gives an all-prefix leading law for one sampled unitary. thm:classicalpage gives a destructive-record mean that does not turn over. thm:exact recovers the whole code only when the complete complement is constant. thm:fullcode and thm:decoupling separate whole-code recovery from the Page mean. thm:retain matches entropy histories with opposite endpoint recovery. The Haar hypothesis is an extra assumption, not a consequence of Enter. That mean is not a Page curve of gravitational evaporation. A microscopic evaporation channel is not constructed. Hawk05-A, Hawk04-D, Hawk02-B, Hawk01-B, Hawk03-A, En07-A, En07-B, En07-C, En02-C, En02-D, Em05-B, Em03-A, VII-G, Oai265-A, and the OpenAI catalogue are documentary source records and are not premises. The supplied author field of Hawk05-A is empty and authorship is not inferred. This comparison is not an exhaustive audit. This is not a derivation of a cognitive construct, not a biological treatment mechanism, not neuronal quantum viability, and not conscious experience. This is not metric reconstruction, not Einstein dynamics, not holographic identification, not a Page curve, and not spacetime emergence. The inherited full characteristic map is not constructed. It does not repair XI-G. It does not close O.1. O.1 stays NOT_CLOSED. The series Route B is not discharged. XVI-N is not discharged. XV-B is not opened. XVI-P is registered and is not a premise. H2, I3, and J2 stay unresolved. Full spacetime emergence is not constructed. No quantum coefficient is admitted. No compilation is asserted. Numerical execution is not asserted. Independent execution is not asserted.
Front matter
abstractAbstractFront matter · lines 78–113
Open as its own pageWe derive the finite random-state Page curve within an explicitly declared Enter-compatible model. A single logical-input-independent Haar unitary scrambles a prepared finite code; a conserving sequence then transfers quantum cells into a growing accessible radiation register. For every fixed pure input chosen independently of the unitary, the exact mean radiation entropy is
We also prove a simultaneous, all-prefix leading Page law for one sampled unitary. Destructive Enter defines a different process: its append-only records have nondecreasing Shannon entropy and cannot recover an arbitrary unknown quantum code. Their exact mean entropy is
which does not turn over.
Recovery is addressed separately. We give exact full-code recovery errors, a conservative Haar subcode-decoupling certificate, corrected flagged-transfer calibrations, and same-model endpoint and entropy comparison bounds. The Haar hypothesis, coherent access, and emission schedule are explicit additional assumptions, not consequences of Enter. The construction derives a finite Page curve and specifies a conditional route to a gravitational comparison; it does not construct a microscopic gravitational evaporation channel, an island formula, or the unresolved characteristic quantum coefficient of the supplied analytic programme.
sectionFront matterFront matter · lines 113–126
Open as its own pageof completion. The mathematical Page-curve target is completed for the finite random-state model stated below. A gravitational Page-curve derivation cannot be obtained from the supplied channel and manuscript summaries alone: the required gravitational dynamics and access-preserving comparison are not supplied. That missing identification is retained as a hypothesis, not replaced by a finite circuit or claimed as a nonexistence theorem.
Enter background and the corrected target
sectionThe philosophical disciplineEnter background and the corrected target › The philosophical discipline · lines 131–149
Open as its own pageCheung's Philosophy of Enter separates destructive readout from quantum recovery. Destructive computational-basis readout consumes the measured quantum name and returns classical data; a decoder instead returns a quantum target through declared access. Consumption is an interface statement, not physical annihilation. The philosophy also distinguishes complete energy, erasure cost, and residual leakage, and distinguishes an analogy from a physical identification CheungPhilosophy.
We implement these distinctions by specifying the code, untouched reference, complete preparation, accessible outputs, excluded outputs, and returned type before stating entropy or recovery claims. Ordinary finite Born instruments are defined explicitly. Cheung's calculus and Manuscript I provide background; their measurement-characterization hypotheses are not enlarged by citation CheungEnter,CheungI.
sectionThree different statements called a Page curveEnter background and the corrected target › Three different statements called a Page curve · lines 150–170
Open as its own pageWe distinguish:
a designed entropy turnover, such as ;
the random-state Page law, with entropy approximately the logarithm of the smaller subsystem dimension;
a gravitational radiation-entropy history obtained from a specified physical theory and radiation interface.
The first does not establish the second, and the second does not identify the third.
Page proposed the exact random-subsystem average; Sen proved it PageAverage,Sen. Page's radiation discussion supplies a separate physical interpretation PageRadiation. Existing gravitational entropy analyses have additional dynamical and geometric content Penington,AlmheiriEtAl. They are not instantiated by naming finite registers “radiation” and “black hole.”
sectionRepairs to the supplied Hawk05-A and refined planEnter background and the corrected target › Repairs to the supplied Hawk05-A and refined plan · lines 172–221
Open as its own pageThe supplied Hawk05-A is a useful foundation, but its flagged calibration theorem contains an obsolete reversed-weight equation. That false equation must be removed from the theorem statement, rather than retained alongside its correction.
{}1.12
Issue Repair in Hawk05-B Residual leakage versus residual recovery For occupied residual probability , , whereas . These are different optimizations. Any discrete schedule from to has a peak at A discrete schedule can skip , or jump directly from one to zero. Only a continuous crossing guarantees that point. A single-excitation turnover is not an extensive Page law. Snapshot readout equals a cumulative history A refined emission-time record can have the same recovery optimum as a coarse snapshot while having a different Shannon entropy. The complete history is computed explicitly below. Averaged entropy equals entropy of the averaged state The Page quantity is , not . The latter is in this model. A pure-input Page curve certifies the whole code Its input is fixed independently of . Whole-code recovery quantifies over every referenced input. The two quantifiers cannot be interchanged. A conditional-entropy bound locates maximal leakage Without a channel comparison, a conditional-entropy inequality does not locate a maximum of complete-complement diamond leakage. The corrections to destructive records, complete complements, and endpoint identification agree with the distinctions in Cheung's Hawk and En07 manuscripts CheungHawk02B,CheungHawk04D,CheungEn07B,CheungEn07C. All elementary mathematical statements used below are proved locally.
Finite interfaces, reference preservation, and recovery
sectionFinite interfaces, reference preservation, and recoveryFinite interfaces, reference preservation, and recovery · lines 223–229
Open as its own pageAll spaces are finite dimensional. Let be the variable logical code, with dimension . An external reference is untouched.
definitionDefinition: Complete interfaceFinite interfaces, reference preservation, and recovery · lines 230–244
Open as its own pageA complete interface is an isometry
Its two channels are
The complete complement includes every unreturned preparation purifier, lost output, measurement environment, and implementation factor admitted in the model.
sectionFinite interfaces, reference preservation, and recoveryFinite interfaces, reference preservation, and recovery · lines 244–274
Open as its own pageFor states and channels use
The diamond norm retains arbitrary reference extensions Watrous (Chapter 3).
Define replacement, recovery error, and complete leakage by
We abbreviate
Compactness ensures that these finite-dimensional infima are attained. Entropies are in bits:
lemmaLemma: Complete restoration and stabilityFinite interfaces, reference preservation, and recovery · Hawk05-B@1#lem:restoration · proof attached · lines 275–300
Open as its own pageEvery isometric channel has a CPTP left inverse. It preserves the trace norm of every referenced operator. CPTP pre- and postprocessing contract , and
Proof. For a fixed code state , the channel
is CP, trace preserving, and satisfies . Isometric embeddings preserve nonzero singular values, also after tensoring with . Trace-distance contraction on referenced states gives diamond-distance contraction. Insert any decoder into the triangle inequality, take infima, and interchange the compared channels to obtain the stability bound.
theoremTheorem: Exact complete-complement criterionFinite interfaces, reference preservation, and recovery · Hawk05-B@1#thm:exact, Hawk05-B@1#eq:normalform · proof attached · lines 302–362
Open as its own pageThe accessible output exactly recovers the entire code if and only if
for one state . If this holds and , there are a state , , and an isometry such that
An exact decoder on all of is
In particular, . Both complementary factors cannot independently recover the whole code when .
Proof. Suppose , and diagonalize its nonzero support:
Write
The complementary identities on all matrix units give
Consequently is isometric and yields (eq:normalform). The displayed decoder is CPTP and recovers every matrix unit.
Conversely, dilate an exact decoder by . The composite dilates the identity channel. The Choi operator of the identity has rank one. Every Kraus operator of that composite is therefore proportional to , so the composite has the form
with fixed . Its channel is replacement. All identities extend to references by linearity. If both factors recovered, the complement of either recoverable factor would be both replacement and recoverable, which is impossible on two distinct inputs.
sectionFinite interfaces, reference preservation, and recoveryFinite interfaces, reference preservation, and recovery · lines 362–368
Open as its own pageThis is the standard exact-error-correction criterion, with the complete complement specified KnillLaflamme,CheungEm05B. It is not a new error-correction principle.
lemmaLemma: Replacement and Choi benchmarksFinite interfaces, reference preservation, and recovery · Hawk05-B@1#lem:benchmarks, Hawk05-B@1#eq:choi · proof attached · lines 369–409
Open as its own pageA replacement accessible channel has recovery error ; every accessible channel has recovery error at most . For
put . Then
If , then
Proof. A decoded replacement has Bell output and Bell overlap , giving the lower bound . Preparing attains it. Indeed, depolarization is the uniform average of the Weyl conjugations; separating its identity term gives diamond distance .
The first Choi inequality uses the Bell input. For a pure referenced input, write , where . Then . Its output difference is obtained from the normalized Choi difference by multiplication with on both sides, giving the second inequality. Convexity handles mixed inputs. The final assertion follows by postprocessing contraction and the triangle inequality.
propositionProposition: Approximate correction inputFinite interfaces, reference preservation, and recovery · Hawk05-B@1#prop:ksw, Hawk05-B@1#eq:ksw · proof attached · lines 411–437
Open as its own pageThe finite information–disturbance theorem gives
Proof. Use the Stinespring continuity theorem and its information–disturbance consequence in raw diamond normalization KSW (Theorems 1 and 3):
Here the replacement state is optimized, and the converse requires existence of an appropriate replacement state, not every state. Substitute and . The independent constant-decoder cap is Lemma lem:benchmarks.
sectionFinite interfaces, reference preservation, and recoveryFinite interfaces, reference preservation, and recovery · lines 437–445
Open as its own pageAdding fixed pure spectators or access-preserving isometric output embeddings changes none of the optimized distances above: compression with a CPTP off-support completion gives the reverse comparison. This observation permits us to suppress fixed vacant factors in the finite model.
One coherent emission history with a Haar hypothesis
sectionOne coherent emission history with a Haar hypothesisOne coherent emission history with a Haar hypothesis · lines 447–462
Open as its own pageFix integers and . Let
be a fixed isometry, with . Choose a single unitary . For ensemble statements only, is distributed according to normalized Haar measure.
definitionDefinition: Meaning of the random-unitary hypothesisOne coherent emission history with a Haar hypothesis · Hawk05-B@1#def:haar · lines 463–473
Open as its own pageHaar randomness is an additional ensemble assumption about a family of devices. In each device, is fixed, independent of the variable logical input, and known to the decoder. It is not resampled between emission steps.
If is instead an unknown discarded random control and the accessible channel is averaged over it, that is a different, replacement-channel task.
sectionOne coherent emission history with a Haar hypothesisOne coherent emission history with a Haar hypothesis · lines 473–477
Open as its own pageThis extra typicality hypothesis is not derived from the Enter philosophy, energy conservation, or Hawking occupations.
sectionA nontrivial conserving realizationOne coherent emission history with a Haar hypothesis › A nontrivial conserving realization · Hawk05-B@1#eq:H0 · lines 478–498
Open as its own pageFor each memory cell and radiation cell , use
The preparation occupies all memory cells with the internal state and leaves every radiation cell vacant.
Let project onto the occupied sector of cell . For an energy gap , declare
Extend to act on the all-occupied memory sector and to be identity elsewhere. Emit cell by the full SWAP between and .
propositionProposition: Complete conserving implementationOne coherent emission history with a Haar hypothesis › A nontrivial conserving realization · Hawk05-B@1#prop:implementation, Hawk05-B@1#eq:Vk · proof attached · lines 499–531
Open as its own pageThe extended and all emission SWAPs commute with . At cut , the effective quantum output is
with
Up to fixed vacant factors and tensor permutations, its complete isometry is
where is the canonical tensor regrouping. Earlier emitted cells are never acted on again. At , the residual is a fixed pure vacant state.
Proof. The all-occupied memory sector has one eigenvalue, ; thus arbitrary on that sector commutes with . SWAP preserves . After swaps, the first internal tensor factors are in radiation, while the remaining factors are in memory. All other factors are fixed vacancies. This is (eq:Vk). At the last cut no internal memory factor remains.
sectionA nontrivial conserving realizationOne coherent emission history with a Haar hypothesis › A nontrivial conserving realization · lines 531–537
Open as its own pageThe energy distribution of is conserved. The ideal mean radiation and memory energies are and . This register Hamiltonian is not a black-hole mass law, and implementation work and control reset are not priced by it.
sectionQuantifiers and input typesOne coherent emission history with a Haar hypothesis › Quantifiers and input types · Hawk05-B@1#eq:Sk · lines 538–558
Open as its own pageFix a pure logical input independently of . Then is a Haar-distributed unit vector in . Define
All cuts in (eq:Sk) belong to one state and one sampled . We do not replace this history by independently sampled states at different cuts.
The fixed-pure-input entropy problem is distinct from recovery of every state of , including reference-entangled states.
Derivation of the finite Page curve
sectionDerivation of the finite Page curveDerivation of the finite Page curve · lines 560–571
Open as its own pageFor a positive integer , let
Put
theoremTheorem: Exact finite Page curveDerivation of the finite Page curve · Hawk05-B@1#thm:page, Hawk05-B@1#eq:page · proof attached · lines 572–622
Open as its own pageUnder Definition def:haar, for every fixed pure input independent of ,
The value is independent of that fixed input and of the code embedding . It satisfies
It increases strictly up to the middle and decreases strictly afterward. For odd , the two central cuts have equal maximal mean entropy. For even , the unique maximal mean occurs at .
Proof. Haar invariance makes a uniform unit vector. The two reductions of a bipartite pure state have the same nonzero spectrum. The calculation in Appendix app:page therefore applies with , , and gives (eq:page). This is the Page–Sen average, rederived there with normalization explicit PageAverage,Sen.
The endpoint and symmetry statements follow immediately. To verify monotonicity, consider consecutive cuts lying on the early half, so , , with . Their difference, in natural entropy units, is
The first term is at least . Since , the difference is at least
Symmetry proves the decreasing half and the central statements.
remarkRemark: Meaning of the midpointDerivation of the finite Page curve · lines 624–630
Open as its own pageThe midpoint arises from the equal-dimension equation , the equal-size emission rule, and the Haar ensemble. It is not a universal “half the emitted quanta” law. Different cell capacities, conservation sectors, or dynamical ensembles require a new calculation.
sectionA simultaneous leading Page law without resamplingDerivation of the finite Page curve › A simultaneous leading Page law without resampling · Hawk05-B@1#eq:tent · lines 632–639
Open as its own pageDefine the capacity tent
lemmaLemma: Haar purityDerivation of the finite Page curve › A simultaneous leading Page law without resampling · Hawk05-B@1#lem:purity · proof attached · lines 640–660
Open as its own pageFor a Haar unit vector in ,
Proof. For , unitary invariance and symmetry give
where swaps the two complete copies. The normalization follows by taking the trace. The purity swap test uses . Its traces against and are and , respectively.
theoremTheorem: All-prefix capacity approximationDerivation of the finite Page curve › A simultaneous leading Page law without resampling · Hawk05-B@1#thm:uniform, Hawk05-B@1#eq:gap, Hawk05-B@1#eq:allprefix, Hawk05-B@1#eq:leadingpage · proof attached · lines 662–726
Open as its own pageFor one sampled , set
Then
Consequently, with
for every ,
In particular, for fixed and inputs independent of ,
Proof. A reduction has rank at most , so its entropy is at most . The elementary Rényi bound follows by Jensen's inequality with weights equal to the eigenvalues. Thus
This proves (eq:gap).
For even , the infinite extension of the sum of is . For odd , it is , which is no larger. Therefore
Markov's inequality and prove (eq:allprefix). Take to obtain (eq:leadingpage).
sectionA simultaneous leading Page law without resamplingDerivation of the finite Page curve › A simultaneous leading Page law without resampling · lines 726–731
Open as its own pageNo independence between cuts was used. This is a temporal statement about one nested sequence, although the exact finite statement is an ensemble mean and an individual realization can fluctuate.
propositionProposition: Entropy after ensemble forgettingDerivation of the finite Page curve › Two averages that must not be confused · Hawk05-B@1#prop:averaging · proof attached · lines 734–756
Open as its own pageFor the fixed pure input,
If the unitary is not known and the accessible channel itself is averaged over Haar measure, then
Its recovery error is at every cut, including .
Proof. The Haar twirl of is . Take the residual partial trace. The recovery conclusion is Lemma lem:benchmarks.
sectionTwo averages that must not be confusedDerivation of the finite Page curve › Two averages that must not be confused · lines 756–761
Open as its own pageAn unknown discarded scrambling control cannot be omitted from complete output accounting and then treated as known by a decoder.
Destructive Enter gives a different entropy history
sectionDestructive Enter gives a different entropy historyDestructive Enter gives a different entropy history · lines 763–789
Open as its own pageFor a register with basis , define destructive readout by
The returned quantum names are those of , not . A complete dilation is
where is unreturned. The complete evolution remains isometric; the returned classical record alone is dephased.
Finite adaptive compositions are CPTP: composing the unnormalized path maps gives . This is the ordinary finite instrument setting also used in Cheung's hybrid and sequential interfaces CheungVIIG,CheungEn02C.
sectionImmediate cell readoutDestructive Enter gives a different entropy history › Immediate cell readout · lines 790–795
Open as its own pageApply Enter in the occupied computational basis immediately after each emission of Section sec:model. Let be the complete unedited record.
theoremTheorem: Exact record law and mean entropyDestructive Enter gives a different entropy history › Immediate cell readout · Hawk05-B@1#thm:classicalpage, Hawk05-B@1#eq:recordlaw, Hawk05-B@1#eq:recordmean · proof attached · lines 796–866
Open as its own pageFor a fixed pure input and fixed ,
The averaged cumulative record entropy is
It increases strictly with . At the endpoint,
For every fixed , not merely on average,
Proof. Later operations are SWAPs on other cells. The projectors defining the full outcome history therefore correspond to the commuting tensor-basis projectors on the original scrambled state. Their Born law is (eq:recordlaw); no postselection is used.
Represent a Haar vector by independent standard complex Gaussians divided by their Euclidean norm. The sums of squared moduli over the entries associated with each prefix are independent Gamma variables of shape . After normalization, the prefix probabilities have the Dirichlet distribution with all parameters . For real near one,
Differentiation at yields
where . This proves (eq:recordmean). Its increment is .
For a fixed process, Shannon's chain rule gives
and the conditional entropy is nonnegative.
propositionProposition: Permanent classical recovery obstructionDestructive Enter gives a different entropy history › Immediate cell readout · Hawk05-B@1#prop:classical · proof attached · lines 868–896
Open as its own pageEvery purely classical channel with code input dimension satisfies
The bound is sharp for computational-basis measurement. Its complete complement is never constant.
Proof. Following a classical channel by any quantum decoder gives a measure-and-prepare channel. Its Bell output is separable HorodeckiShorRuskai. For product states,
Convexity extends the bound to separable states. The Bell-projector test gives error at least .
Basis measurement followed by basis-state preparation is dephasing. Dephasing is the average of the phase conjugations, so separating its identity term gives matching error . A constant complete complement would imply exact recovery by Theorem thm:exact, a contradiction.
sectionImmediate cell readoutDestructive Enter gives a different entropy history › Immediate cell readout · lines 896–901
Open as its own pageThe bound concerns the entire adaptive record, not just one cell. A quantum-output decoder cannot repair entanglement breaking merely by preparing a quantum state from classical data.
propositionProposition: Hybrid output and terminal discardDestructive Enter gives a different entropy history › Immediate cell readout · Hawk05-B@1#prop:hybrid-drop · proof attached · lines 902–928
Open as its own pageFor any returned block-diagonal output ,
Thus an unchanged positive-entropy record prevents purity of the raw hybrid output.
Furthermore, for all referenced operators,
Terminal residual Enter followed by drop leaves the already-returned accessible channel unchanged.
Proof. The spectrum of a diagonal block is times the spectrum of , proving the entropy formula. Writing an operator as , readout followed by discard returns , precisely the partial trace. The blocks may contain an arbitrary reference.
sectionImmediate cell readoutDestructive Enter gives a different entropy history › Immediate cell readout · lines 928–934
Open as its own pageThis identity is an interface equality, not physical annihilation or a reset-cost theorem CheungEn07A,CheungEn07B,CheungEn07C.
The Page curve and whole-code recovery are different tasks
sectionAn exact full-code calibration in the same modelThe Page curve and whole-code recovery are different tasks › An exact full-code calibration in the same model · lines 939–942
Open as its own pageTake and identify with a unitary input dictionary.
theoremTheorem: Whole ambient code: exact errorsThe Page curve and whole-code recovery are different tasks › An exact full-code calibration in the same model · Hawk05-B@1#thm:fullcode, Hawk05-B@1#eq:fullcode, Hawk05-B@1#eq:fullrecord · proof attached · lines 943–991
Open as its own pageFor every fixed , at a cut with , , the coherent channels satisfy
If the returned radiation is destructively read out, its classical channel satisfies
In particular, a midpoint mean-entropy peak does not imply accurate recovery of the whole -dimensional input.
Proof. Conjugating the logical target by leaves the optimization unchanged. The coherent channel becomes . The decoder appending has error , by the Weyl twirl on . For the reverse bound, use the product Bell input . After is lost, its reference is independent of every decoder input. The decoded full Bell overlap is at most . This proves the recovery formula.
The complementary channel is . Replacement by has distance at most . Fixing the input on and testing a Bell input on gives the matching lower bound for every replacement.
For record-only access, the measurement effects on the transformed code are
If is any decoder output, its full Bell overlap is
The decoder preparing attains the bound: its channel is , the average of phase/Weyl conjugations, one of which is the identity. Separating that term proves the matching upper bound.
sectionAn exact full-code calibration in the same modelThe Page curve and whole-code recovery are different tasks › An exact full-code calibration in the same model · lines 991–998
Open as its own pageTheorem thm:fullcode is the whole-code SWAP calibration documented in Cheung's Hawk04-D, here applied to the same Haar-prepared entropy model CheungHawk04D. It is not a Hayden–Preskill small-diary claim HaydenPreskill.
exampleExample: The reference changes the entropy historyThe Page curve and whole-code recovery are different tasks › An exact full-code calibration in the same model · lines 999–1011
Open as its own pageFor the full-code Bell input, the marginal logical state is . For every ,
This referenced-input marginal entropy is monotone and ends at , not zero. Its final reference entanglement is correctly preserved by coherent recovery. The pure-unreferenced Page theorem does not apply to that marginal.
remarkRemark: No uniform pure-input Page theorem on the full codeThe Page curve and whole-code recovery are different tasks › An exact full-code calibration in the same model · lines 1013–1019
Open as its own pageFor every on the full code, the input produces zero entropy at every cut. It depends on , so it violates the fixed-input hypothesis. This explicitly prevents promotion of Theorem thm:uniform to a uniform entropy assertion over all inputs.
sectionA smaller code: a conservative complete-channel certificateThe Page curve and whole-code recovery are different tasks › A smaller code: a conservative complete-channel certificate · Hawk05-B@1#eq:gamma · lines 1021–1039
Open as its own pageFor a Haar embedding , , define
Put
theoremTheorem: Haar subcode decouplingThe Page curve and whole-code recovery are different tasks › A smaller code: a conservative complete-channel certificate · Hawk05-B@1#thm:decoupling, Hawk05-B@1#eq:HS, Hawk05-B@1#eq:prob-decouple · proof attached · lines 1040–1095
Open as its own pageFor the fixed code dimension ,
Consequently,
For , with probability at least ,
These are whole-code, reference-preserving bounds.
For fixed and , whenever . More generally, the sufficient regime is . This last dimension dependence is a conservative certificate, not an optimal random-code threshold.
Proof. Appendix app:fourth proves the fourth-moment identity (eq:HS). The operator acts on a space of dimension , so
Cauchy–Schwarz in expectation, followed by Lemma lem:benchmarks, gives
Markov's inequality gives the leakage statement, and Proposition prop:ksw gives recovery.
Since
the stated sufficient regimes follow. At , the expression vanishes exactly.
sectionA smaller code: a conservative complete-channel certificateThe Page curve and whole-code recovery are different tasks › A smaller code: a conservative complete-channel certificate · lines 1095–1120
Open as its own pageThis theorem supplies a channel estimate not inferred from the Page entropy slope. It deliberately retains the input-dimension factor in the Choi-to-diamond conversion.
An early-access comparison follows by interchanging and :
With probability at least ,
and therefore
Early replacement and late recovery are thus separate proved comparisons in the Haar subcode model.
remarkRemark: Partners and extra commuting copiesThe Page curve and whole-code recovery are different tasks › A smaller code: a conservative complete-channel certificate · lines 1121–1136
Open as its own pageThe normal form (eq:normalform) represents the recovered logical algebra on the accessible support as . Its commutant on that support is , as follows by commuting with all logical matrix units. The syndrome algebra is not a second recoverable copy of the same unknown logical state. An abstract algebra of the same dimension may exist there without carrying that input.
This is the distinction relevant to the supplied partner comparisons in Hawk03-A CheungHawk03A. No independent-factor entropy bound is used to estimate complete leakage or identify its maximum.
Explicit entropy–recovery separations
theoremTheorem: An extensive Page history without code releaseExplicit entropy–recovery separations › Same entropy history, inaccessible logical memory · Hawk05-B@1#thm:retain · proof attached · lines 1145–1184
Open as its own pageThere are two conserving sequential complete interfaces with the same accessible and residual spaces such that:
for one fixed pure code input, their accessible states agree at every prefix;
the two ensembles have the same exact Page mean (eq:page) for every fixed pure code input;
the endpoint recovery errors are respectively and , and endpoint complete leakages are respectively and .
Thus even the extensive Page mean does not determine endpoint whole-code recovery.
Proof. Append a degenerate inaccessible register . In the returning model, run Section sec:model on the variable input and fix in . In the retaining model, store the variable input in and run the same radiation schedule on the fixed dummy input .
All transfer operations conserve (eq:H0); 's logical labels are degenerate. Both are complete isometries into the same spaces. For the input , the radiation histories agree exactly for the same . Haar invariance proves that the returning model's mean entropy for any fixed pure input equals the dummy model's mean, namely (eq:page).
At the endpoint the returning radiation is , with fixed complete residual. The retaining radiation is fixed at , while the residual contains . The endpoint recovery errors follow from exact correction and the replacement benchmark. The retained logical copy has leakage : a CPTP left inverse gives the identity-channel lower bound, and an embedded maximally mixed replacement gives the upper bound.
sectionSame entropy history, inaccessible logical memoryExplicit entropy–recovery separations › Same entropy history, inaccessible logical memory · lines 1184–1190
Open as its own pageThis is an ensemble Page-history extension of the disclosed-memory separation in Cheung's Hawk01-B CheungHawk01B. The comparison does not impose identical assumptions of complete outgoing access and a unique empty physical endpoint.
propositionProposition: Selected spectra and thermal marginalsExplicit entropy–recovery separations › Same entropy history, inaccessible logical memory · Hawk05-B@1#prop:thermal · proof attached · lines 1191–1213
Open as its own pageLet have purification , and put , , with . The isometries
have identical accessible spectra for every pure input, but recovery errors and . For , their selected energy laws agree. One may take to be Gibbs.
Proof. The accessible channels are and . The spectrum, recovery, and energy conclusions follow directly.
sectionSame entropy history, inaccessible logical memoryExplicit entropy–recovery separations › Same entropy history, inaccessible logical memory · lines 1213–1218
Open as its own pageThe supplied En07-C and Oai265-A records contain related separations CheungEn07C,CheungOai265A. Oai265-A is used only as a documentary comparison; no catalogue family is a premise.
sectionThe corrected single-excitation calibrationExplicit entropy–recovery separations › The corrected single-excitation calibration · lines 1219–1250
Open as its own pageFor comparison with Hawk05-A and Hawk02-B, let each memory and emission cell have space . At opportunity , rotate
with the complementary rotation on . The occupied labels are degenerate, so the rotation conserves the sum of occupied-sector energies.
Set
The complete isometry has the form
where the normalized emission amplitudes define an isometry .
theoremTheorem: Clean flagged formulas and the complete recordExplicit entropy–recovery separations › The corrected single-excitation calibration · Hawk05-B@1#thm:flagged, Hawk05-B@1#eq:flaggederrors, Hawk05-B@1#eq:flaggedentropy, Hawk05-B@1#eq:flagrecorderror, Hawk05-B@1#eq:flagrecordentropy · proof attached · lines 1251–1326
Open as its own pageFor ,
Immediate cell readout returns histories consisting of either no emission or an emission time and basis label . For , their probabilities are
Its recovery error and complete-record entropy are
If and , then
If , the increment is zero.
Proof. The channels are orthogonal-block channels
The decoder compressing the occupied block and preparing on vacancy gives the radiation upper bound . On a Bell input, no decoder has overlap greater than , proving optimality. Interchanging occupied probabilities gives the residual recovery error. The exact residual leakage is proved in Appendix app:flag; it is , not residual recovery. The entropy formulas follow from the orthogonal blocks.
Successive local readouts may be commuted past later rotations on other cells for the purpose of computing the complete outcome law. Their probabilities are therefore and .
Preparing on a reported label and on no emission gives decoded channel . Its error is at most . The Bell test gives the same lower bound, irrespective of emission time. The history entropy follows by splitting the no-emission branch and then its label. At the next opportunity only the former no-emission outcome is refined, giving the displayed increment.
sectionThe corrected single-excitation calibrationExplicit entropy–recovery separations › The corrected single-excitation calibration · lines 1326–1345
Open as its own pageThe recovery formula agrees with the supplied Hawk02-B calibration CheungHawk02B. Erasing the emission-time label gives a coarse snapshot record with entropy , but does not change the recovery optimum: time can be resampled with input-independent conditional probabilities . The refined and coarse records have different entropy ledgers.
For a pure unreferenced input the coherent entropy is , bounded by one bit regardless of the number of cells. Taking , gives coherent entropies for a basis input and cumulative classical entropies . Other prepared turnover sequences, including the supplied En02-D example, are comparisons rather than premises of the Haar Page derivation CheungEn02D.
Endpoint certification and controlled physical comparison
sectionFour obligations, supplied in one modelEndpoint certification and controlled physical comparison › Four obligations, supplied in one model · lines 1350–1366
Open as its own pageA physical endpoint package must provide:
a justified finite code and complete prepared isometry, including preparation purifiers;
complete logical-input-independent unitary evolution on a justified domain;
access-preserving identifications into common comparison spaces, including a justified quantum receiver if physical radiation is to be collected;
a proved complete-complement replacement allowance.
These are the same-model obligations in Cheung's En07 endpoint formulations CheungEn07B,CheungEn07C. They are not consequences of selected thermal occupations.
theoremTheorem: Endpoint channel certificateEndpoint certification and controlled physical comparison › Four obligations, supplied in one model · Hawk05-B@1#thm:endpoint · proof attached · lines 1367–1403
Open as its own pageAfter the declared identifications, suppose actual and proxy complete channels satisfy
If the proxy complement obeys , then
A fixed proxy-optimal decoder has actual error at most
If a feasible state instead supplies the normalized Choi discrepancy
one may take .
Proof. Partial traces contract the complete-channel comparison. The triangle inequality proves leakage. Apply a fixed proxy-optimal decoder to the actual accessible channel, use contraction, and then use (eq:ksw). The constant decoder gives the independent cap. Equation (eq:choi) gives the Choi conversion.
sectionFour obligations, supplied in one modelEndpoint certification and controlled physical comparison › Four obligations, supplied in one model · lines 1403–1410
Open as its own pageThe finite model of Section sec:model meets these obligations mathematically: fixes preparation, its unitary extension and SWAPs fix evolution, tensor regrouping fixes access, and the terminal residual is a fixed pure vacancy. These are not gravitationally justified objects.
sectionEntropy needs its own comparison allowanceEndpoint certification and controlled physical comparison › Entropy needs its own comparison allowance · lines 1411–1422
Open as its own pageFor an output dimension , define the monotone entropy modulus
theoremTheorem: Conditional Page-history transferEndpoint certification and controlled physical comparison › Entropy needs its own comparison allowance · Hawk05-B@1#thm:transfer, Hawk05-B@1#eq:entropytransfer · proof attached · lines 1423–1464
Open as its own pageSuppose one physical model and one receiver supply complete access-preserving comparisons to a fixed sampled finite proxy , at every declared cut . Let the common accessible comparison dimension be , including any necessary padding, and suppose
For every fixed compared input,
If the physical model itself has an ensemble coupled to the Haar proxy with these allowances, then
For coupled single histories, the all-prefix deviation obeys
Hence the normalized leading Page law transfers whenever
and the other hypotheses of Theorem thm:uniform hold.
Proof. The channel comparison bounds output trace distance by . Apply the sharp finite-dimensional entropy continuity estimate Audenaert. Maximizing its right-hand side over trace distances at most gives . Take expectations or the maximum and use the triangle inequality.
sectionEntropy needs its own comparison allowanceEndpoint certification and controlled physical comparison › Entropy needs its own comparison allowance · lines 1464–1485
Open as its own pageThe dimension is the actual common comparison dimension, not automatically the ideal smaller Schmidt rank. If errors populate additional sectors, those sectors cannot be removed from the continuity allowance without a separate support estimate.
Compatible complete preparation, evolution, collection, and implementation errors can be accumulated by replacing one channel factor at a time:
CPTP contraction proves this telescoping bound. It does not convert a scalar occupation or metric error into a diamond allowance. This partition of hypotheses is emphasized in Cheung's Hawk04-D CheungHawk04D.
sectionWhat remains missing for gravityEndpoint certification and controlled physical comparison › What remains missing for gravity · lines 1486–1515
Open as its own pageFor a gravitational application, one must still supply:
a microscopic complete state and dynamics, with justified radiation and residual algebras or finite encodings;
a physical derivation or controlled comparison establishing the required random-state typicality in the relevant conserved sectors;
a justified emission clock and radiation-capacity history;
a coherent radiation-to-memory receiver with a complete-channel allowance, if recovery is claimed;
a same-model endpoint comparison and complete-complement allowance.
Hawking's semiclassical emission calculation is an external field-theoretic result Hawking. The supplied fixed-background emission and En07-C records do not provide these microscopic identifications CheungEm03A,CheungEn07C. A physical mass balance, even if separately supplied, does not construct them.
No finite-band regulator, conditional luminosity law, or independently defined characteristic coefficient is transferred into this model. Existing gravitational Page-curve calculations remain external comparisons, not premises or objects constructed here Penington,AlmheiriEtAl.
Three ledgers and the Enter analogies
sectionEnergy, reset resources, and informationThree ledgers and the Enter analogies › Energy, reset resources, and information · lines 1520–1531
Open as its own pageThe three ledgers remain distinct:
propositionProposition: No thermal cost from a channel identity aloneThree ledgers and the Enter analogies › Energy, reset resources, and information · proof attached · lines 1532–1547
Open as its own pageA reduced channel does not determine its heat, work, or reusable-memory reset cost.
Proof. SWAP with an independent blank qubit implements reset of the observed memory while transferring its referenced input to the blank. With equal Hamiltonians , it conserves their sum and transfers energy for excitation probability . The same reset channel is obtained for every positive . Independent unobserved fuel or reservoir processes can also be appended without changing the observed channel. The blank and fuel resources must be restored before a cyclic cost is claimed.
sectionEnergy, reset resources, and informationThree ledgers and the Enter analogies › Energy, reset resources, and information · lines 1547–1569
Open as its own pageThis is the channel-versus-implementation separation in Cheung's En07-A/B CheungEn07A,CheungEn07B. In a separately specified initially uncorrelated memory–Gibbs reservoir setup undergoing a complete unitary,
Thus thermal erasure has additional hypotheses ReebWolf. No such thermal machine is constructed by the readout-and-drop identity.
An information-free residual can retain energy and degrees of freedom: has zero leakage but positive residual energy for .
sectionProcessor analogyThree ledgers and the Enter analogies › Processor analogy · lines 1570–1583
Open as its own pageAn -cell processor coherently scrambles a prepared pure input with a fixed unitary and releases its cells one by one. The receiver stores all cells as quantum systems. Under the additional Haar ensemble, the exact mean entropy is the Page curve. Globally the computation remains reversible.
Installing Enter on every released cell changes the returned type to classical strings. The same apparatus now has the monotone record entropy (eq:recordmean) and the permanent quantum-recovery obstruction. Retaining coherent measurement environments would declare a different, larger quantum access interface.
sectionTorn strip and photograph albumThree ledgers and the Enter analogies › Torn strip and photograph album · lines 1584–1595
Open as its own pageFor a classical message , more photographs can reduce , even though the complete album entropy cannot decrease.
For an unknown quantum strip, photographs are measurement outcomes, not quantum fragments. A Page turnover belongs to the coherently retained quantum fragments in the stated model. It is not a turnover of the append-only album, and the album does not acquire the original reference entanglement after the last photograph.
sectionLibrary cards and quantum booksThree ledgers and the Enter analogies › Library cards and quantum books · lines 1596–1610
Open as its own pageClassical photocopies can identify classical text. If a book denotes an arbitrary unknown quantum state, a classical card catalogue cannot return every amplitude and reference correlation from one copy. A quantum carrier must remain accessible for whole-code recovery.
A classical index can legitimately select a quantum branch decoder when an appropriate quantum output survives. It must not be renamed the quantum carrier itself. Emptying the named locked stack is an interface event, not proof of physical annihilation or a final energetic burst.
Hawk05-B mathematical release
theoremTheorem: Page derivation with typed accessHawk05-B mathematical release · Hawk05-B@1#thm:main · proof attached · lines 1615–1656
Open as its own pageFor the explicitly prepared, Haar-scrambled, conserving finite emission model:
coherent quantum radiation has the exact finite Page mean (eq:page) for every fixed pure input independent of ;
one sampled unitary supplies an all-prefix normalized leading Page history as in (eq:leadingpage);
destructive Enter has the exact cumulative-record mean (eq:recordmean), not a Page turnover, and record-only whole-code recovery error is at least ;
the same coherent Page ensemble can describe a full code whose exact radiation recovery error is , or a smaller code with the separate decoupling certificate (eq:prob-decouple);
the corrected single-excitation calibration is (eq:flaggederrors), with its complete classical history given by (eq:flagrecordentropy);
entropy history, selected thermal data, complete-complement constancy, and executable quantum recovery remain separate certification targets;
a physical Page-history or endpoint conclusion follows only after its same-model comparison hypotheses are supplied.
The finite random-state Page curve is constructed. A microscopic gravitational evaporation channel and the inherited characteristic quantum coefficient are not constructed.
Proof. Items (i)–(ii) are Theorems thm:page and thm:uniform. Item (iii) is Theorem thm:classicalpage and Proposition prop:classical. Item (iv) is Theorems thm:fullcode and thm:decoupling. Item (v) is Theorem thm:flagged. Item (vi) follows from the explicit separations and the recovery criterion. Item (vii) is Theorems thm:endpoint and thm:transfer. No gravitational comparison or characteristic product is supplied by the objects in these proofs.
sectionHawk05-B mathematical releaseHawk05-B mathematical release · lines 1656–1667
Open as its own page. Enter is a discipline for keeping the returned output and access contract explicit. With additional coherent-state and typicality hypotheses, it accommodates a genuine finite Page-law derivation. With destructive record-only access, it excludes the classical-album version of that curve. Neither conclusion supplies a missing gravitational dynamics.
Evaluation of the exact Page average
sectionEvaluation of the exact Page averageEvaluation of the exact Page average · Hawk05-B@1#eq:pagegamma · lines 1669–1701
Open as its own pageThis appendix evaluates the standard random-state average. The result is due to Page and Sen; no priority is claimed PageAverage,Sen. Natural logarithms are used until the final conversion to bits.
Let , , and let be an matrix of independent standard complex Gaussians. Set
The normalized Gaussian vector is Haar on the unit sphere and has reduction . Gaussian radius and direction are independent, so and are independent. Moreover, has Gamma density with shape :
Since
the desired natural-log entropy satisfies
sectionThe eigenvalue densityEvaluation of the exact Page average › The eigenvalue density · Hawk05-B@1#eq:wishart, Hawk05-B@1#eq:onepoint · lines 1702–1763
Open as its own pageWrite . The squared singular values of have joint density proportional to
For completeness, the singular-value change of variables gives one factor from the unused column directions for each singular value. The two complex angular directions associated with a pair of distinct singular values give . The radial coordinates contribute . Integrating the angular variables leaves a constant independent of the . Repeated singular values form a set of Gaussian measure zero, so this change of variables determines the density.
Define generalized Laguerre polynomials by Rodrigues's formula
Integration by parts gives orthogonality with weight , and norm
Indeed, has leading coefficient ; it is orthogonal to every lower-degree polynomial, and integrating it against gives .
Replacing the monomials in the Vandermonde determinant by these polynomials changes only a nonzero constant. Expanding the squared determinant and integrating with orthogonality shows that the one-point eigenvalue density is
Its integral is . Therefore
sectionThe logarithmic integralEvaluation of the exact Page average › The logarithmic integral · Hawk05-B@1#eq:lagrec, Hawk05-B@1#eq:lagder, Hawk05-B@1#eq:logint · lines 1764–1849
Open as its own pageThe finite-polynomial or generating-function identities give
The first follows by comparing coefficients. For the second, use
and differentiate in . Terms with index are zero.
Orthogonality and (eq:lagrec) give
The cross term in the derivative of is
Only the term of (eq:lagder) contributes. Differentiation under the integral is justified for , locally uniformly in , by the exponential weight and integrability of . Thus
To sum (eq:logint), put and use
The coefficient sum is
The double sum simplifies because
Consequently
Since , we obtain
Substitute this expression into (eq:pagegamma):
Finally . Division by proves (eq:page), including .
The Haar fourth-moment calculation for code decoupling
sectionThe Haar fourth-moment calculation for code decouplingThe Haar fourth-moment calculation for code decoupling · Hawk05-B@1#eq:fourth, Hawk05-B@1#eq:omegapurity, Hawk05-B@1#eq:sigmapurity · lines 1851–1948
Open as its own pageHaar invariance permits us to take to be the first coordinate vectors. Write , with , .
For , the required Haar fourth moment is
This is the order-two Haar integration identity CollinsSniady. It can also be obtained directly: left and right unitary invariance restrict the tensor to the two row pairings and two column pairings; symmetry under exchange gives two coefficients. Contracting with gives the two linear equations whose solution is and .
For the normalized complementary Choi state,
Therefore
Substitution of (eq:fourth) gives four index counts:
The last two carry the negative coefficient divided by . Thus
Similarly,
and the corresponding counts are
Hence
Because ,
Subtracting (eq:sigmapurity) from (eq:omegapurity) with this factor gives
which proves (eq:HS). The expression vanishes for a one-dimensional residual, as it must.
Correct residual leakage in the flagged model
sectionCorrect residual leakage in the flagged modelCorrect residual leakage in the flagged model · lines 1950–1990
Open as its own pageConsider
on occupied code plus vacancy. Replacement by gives distance .
For the lower bound, pinching any candidate replacement state into occupied and vacant blocks cannot increase its distance from this channel. Covariance under logical unitary conjugations, convexity, and averaging then reduce the optimization to states
On the Bell input, the occupied block difference is , and the vacant block has trace norm . Thus twice the tested trace distance is
For , this is . For , it is . For , it is . Therefore
The reversed weight is the residual recovery error, not its leakage. No contradictory equation is retained as a theorem statement in this manuscript.
The separate characteristic-map programme is not completed
sectionThe separate characteristic-map programme is not completedThe separate characteristic-map programme is not completed · lines 1992–2032
Open as its own pageThe supplied XIV-I, XIV-J, and XV-B excerpts concern a distinct distributional construction, not the finite Haar model CheungXIVI,CheungXIVJ,CheungXVB. Their supplied version-specific boundary is: internal amplitudes are constructed at I2; the full grouped characteristic map remains unresolved at I3/J2, with the graph-specific continuation unresolved in XV-B version 2.
For a reconstruction map , a linear presentation-level candidate descends precisely when
Indeed, this is exactly the condition that equal reconstructed presentations have equal candidate outputs. The identity
also shows why highest presentation degree is not automatically an intrinsic reconstructed symbol.
Neither these elementary compatibility statements nor the Page integrals above construct the full six-branch characteristic composition. The remaining graph-specific map, section, remainder, transverse estimates, contact compatibility, output wavefront, and normalized quantum admission are not supplied here.
The standing supplied statuses are unchanged: ; the downstream quantum-admission exit is not opened; XVI-N is not discharged; no inherited characteristic quantum coefficient is admitted. The existence of a technical XV-B manuscript must not be confused with passage through the earlier admission exit. These are scoped provenance statements, not universal nonexistence theorems.
Declarations
sectionDeclarationsDeclarations · lines 2033–2070
Open as its own pageand novelty. The exact random-state average is the Page–Sen result. Exact correction, entanglement breaking, and Stinespring continuity are established theories. The contribution is a complete finite emission realization, a simultaneous leading-history estimate, an exact destructive-record comparison, and a typed separation of entropy and recovery targets. No priority is claimed for the standard theorems.
provenance. Cheung's internal manuscripts are cited by identifier and supplied version. Their documentary comparison does not import their physical models or discharge their unrelated open gates. Hawk05-A is cited as the supplied source file, whose author field is empty; authorship is not inferred. The journal entry for Cheung's Enter article is attributed to the companion's bibliographic record, not represented as an independently verified publisher-status report.
and computational scope. No gravitational Hamiltonian, backreaction equation, physical radiation receiver, island, quantum extremal surface, or realistic microscopic evaporation endpoint is constructed. The prescribed Haar unitary is not compiled over a fixed gate library, and its implementation complexity and cyclic thermodynamic cost are not claimed.
. This source is standalone and written for
pdflatex. No successful compiler execution, numerical experiment, proof-assistant verification, independent referee approval, or journal acceptance is asserted.bibliographyReferencesDeclarations · lines 2071–2342
Open as its own pageCheungPhilosophy
N. Cheung, The Philosophy of Enter: Destructive Readout, Quantum Recovery, and the Refusal of Identification, EntPhil, version 2. Enter Calculus Companion. Introductory essay, not a theorem premise.
https://enter.grok.me/enter.CheungEnter
N. Cheung, “The Enter Calculus: A linear quantum lambda calculus with an operational characterization of measurement.” Bibliographic entry supplied in EntPhil version 2: Frontiers in Physics, volume 14 (2026), DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2026.1954943. The companion describes an accepted article with final formatted version forthcoming; that publisher status is not independently certified by this manuscript.CheungI
N. Cheung, Manuscript I, version 2. Enter Calculus Companion. Supplied finite destructive-measurement characterization, including
thm:main.https://enter.grok.me/browse/I.Hawk05A
Hawk05-A: Enter, Page-Type Entropy Turnover, and the Classical-Record Obstruction. Supplied source
Hawk05-A.tex, dated 15 October 2026. Author field unspecified. The reversed-weight equation in its flagged theorem is corrected in Section sec:repairs and Appendix app:flag.CheungHawk02B
N. Cheung, Hawk02-B: Hamiltonian-Derived Emission and Quantitative Recovery in a Finite Evaporation Model, version 2. Enter Calculus Companion. Supplied labels
thm:B3,thm:B7.https://enter.grok.me/browse/Hawk02-B.CheungHawk01B
N. Cheung, Hawk01-B: Complete Quantum-Code Preservation in a Sequential Evaporation Model: Radiation Correlations, Residual Leakage, and the Page-Curve–Recovery Gap, version 1. Enter Calculus Companion. Supplied
thm:entropyseparation.https://enter.grok.me/browse/Hawk01-B.CheungHawk03A
N. Cheung, Hawk03-A, version 1. Enter Calculus Companion. Supplied complete-complement, independent-factor, and partner comparisons. Their model-specific hypotheses are not imported.
https://enter.grok.me/browse/Hawk03-A.CheungHawk04D
N. Cheung, Hawk04-D: From Finite Enter Interfaces to Conditional Evaporation Certificates: Controlled Limits, Mass Laws, and Quantum Recovery, version 1. Enter Calculus Companion. Relevant supplied labels:
thm:swap,thm:flagged,thm:endpoint.https://enter.grok.me/browse/Hawk04-D.CheungEn07A
N. Cheung, En07-A, version 1. Enter Calculus Companion. Supplied readout/discard and
prop:no-landauer-from-channelrecords.https://enter.grok.me/browse/En07-A.CheungEn07B
N. Cheung, En07-B, version 1. Enter Calculus Companion. Supplied endpoint and separate-ledger records.
https://enter.grok.me/browse/En07-B.CheungEn07C
N. Cheung, En07-C: Hawking Radiation under Destructive Enter, version 1. Enter Calculus Companion. Supplied
def:four,thm:endpoint, and spectral/entropy separation records.https://enter.grok.me/browse/En07-C.CheungEn02C
N. Cheung, En02-C, version 1. Enter Calculus Companion. Supplied reference-preserving sequential soundness,
thm:C1.https://enter.grok.me/browse/En02-C.CheungEn02D
N. Cheung, En02-D, version 4. Enter Calculus Companion. Supplied prepared-state turnover,
thm:turnover.https://enter.grok.me/browse/En02-D.CheungVIIG
N. Cheung, VII-G, version 1. Enter Calculus Companion. Supplied finite hybrid channel and history-instrument structure.
https://enter.grok.me/browse/VII-G.CheungEm05B
N. Cheung, Em05-B, version 1. Enter Calculus Companion. Supplied
thm:constantComplement.https://enter.grok.me/browse/Em05-B.CheungEm03A
N. Cheung, Em03-A, version 1. Enter Calculus Companion. Supplied fixed-background scalar emission law,
thm:main; not a complete microscopic evaporation channel.https://enter.grok.me/browse/Em03-A.CheungOai265A
N. Cheung, Oai265-A, version 2. Enter Calculus Companion. Supplied record/spectrum/recovery separation,
thm:separation. Documentary comparison only.https://enter.grok.me/browse/Oai265-A.CheungXIVI
N. Cheung, XIV-I, version 1. Enter Calculus Companion. Supplied I2 construction and I3 boundary.
https://enter.grok.me/browse/XIV-I.CheungXIVJ
N. Cheung, XIV-J, version 1. Enter Calculus Companion. Supplied reconstruction descent, supported reference, and J2 boundary.
https://enter.grok.me/browse/XIV-J.CheungXVB
N. Cheung, XV-B, version 2. Enter Calculus Companion. Supplied relative-lifting and extension interfaces; the inherited graph-specific map remains unresolved.
https://enter.grok.me/browse/XV-B.Watrous
J. Watrous, The Theory of Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, 2018. Author's manuscript:
https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/ watrous/TQI/.KnillLaflamme
E. Knill and R. Laflamme, “Theory of quantum error-correcting codes.” Physical Review A 55 (1997), 900–911. DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.55.900.KSW
D. Kretschmann, D. Schlingemann, and R. F. Werner, “The information-disturbance tradeoff and the continuity of Stinespring's representation.” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 54 (2008), 1708–1717. DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2008.917696.https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0605009.HorodeckiShorRuskai
M. Horodecki, P. W. Shor, and M. B. Ruskai, “Entanglement breaking channels.” Reviews in Mathematical Physics 15 (2003), 629–641. DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129055X03001709. Preprint title: General Entanglement Breaking Channels.https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0302031.PageAverage
D. N. Page, “Average entropy of a subsystem.” Physical Review Letters 71 (1993), 1291–1294. DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1291.https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9305007.Sen
S. Sen, “Average entropy of a subsystem.” Physical Review Letters 77 (1996), 1–3. DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1.https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9601132.PageRadiation
D. N. Page, “Information in black hole radiation.” Physical Review Letters 71 (1993), 3743–3746. DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.3743.https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9306083.HaydenPreskill
P. Hayden and J. Preskill, “Black holes as mirrors: Quantum information in random subsystems.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2007(09), 120. DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/120.https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.4025.CollinsSniady
B. Collins and P. \'Sniady, “Integration with respect to the Haar measure on unitary, orthogonal and symplectic group.” Communications in Mathematical Physics 264 (2006), 773–795.
https://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0402073.Audenaert
K. M. R. Audenaert, “A sharp continuity estimate for the von Neumann entropy.” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 40 (2007), 8127–8136. DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/40/28/S18.https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0610146.Hawking
S. W. Hawking, “Particle creation by black holes.” Communications in Mathematical Physics 43 (1975), 199–220. DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345020.ReebWolf
D. Reeb and M. M. Wolf, “An improved Landauer principle with finite-size corrections.” New Journal of Physics 16 (2014), 103011. DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/10/103011.https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.4352.Penington
G. Penington, Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox. arXiv:1905.08255. External gravitational comparison; not a premise of the finite model.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.08255.AlmheiriEtAl
A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf, and H. Maxfield, The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole. arXiv:1905.08762. External gravitational comparison; not a premise of the finite model.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.08762.