All manuscripts

Manuscript VII-E-ST@1 · VII-E-ST.tex · d28d9c5d

VII-E-ST: Observation boundaries and finite hybrid feedback on a prescribed conical spacetime Record compatibility, residual separation, certified markings, and causal transport

Export VII-E-ST.tex

Specifies version 1 of a local Grade S adaptation of the VII-E observation-boundary contract and the VII-G finite hybrid-channel contract onto a supported presentation of a prescribed conical product. prop:nonGH says the regular product is not globally hyperbolic. def:presentation is a supported developing chart: no incoming boundary data and no interaction with the singular worldsheet. The flat Green operator is not intrinsic on the cone. thm:pullback is the effect-pullback and full residual criterion. thm:residual-obstruction separates ideal residual targets with identical records by trace distance one half. thm:luders is the exact sharp-measurement coherence criterion. thm:structure is a complete state-independent branch representation. cor:informative says an informative classical record excludes recovery of every unknown quantum input. Record compatibility is not residual agreement. Matter-controlled slicing is not matter-driven gravitational dynamics. thm:certificate is a four-face transverse marking and a compact 3+1 lift, not the conical worldsheet and not VII-F. thm:finite-model selects strictly ordered slices and changes no conical metric. thm:coarse-gap keeps an exact half-diamond residual gap after coarse aggregation. thm:instrument is a finite destructive clock. Enter consumes a finite clock encoding, not the geometric time axis. thm:locality-cone and thm:transport keep scheduled influence inside the prescribed cone and move a finite payload together with its classical control record on a target-adapted route. No quantum Ward identity or radiative coefficient is constructed. The quantum certificate remains RG-open. The source is formatted for anonymous review. The author field is intentionally empty. Citation of N. Cheung does not assign authorship of this adaptation. Cited sheets and the OpenAI catalogue are documentary source records and are not a premise. This comparison is not an exhaustive audit. This is not a derivation of a cognitive construct, not holographic identification, not a Page curve, not spacetime emergence, and not Einstein dynamics. An intrinsic global cone theory is not constructed. Grade E is not constructed. The inherited full characteristic map is not constructed. Full spacetime emergence is not constructed. It does not discharge XVI-N. XVI-N is not discharged. It does not close O.1. O.1 stays NOT_CLOSED. XV-B is not opened. H2, I3, and J2 stay unresolved. No quantum coefficient is admitted. No compilation is asserted. The source has not been compiled. No machine-checked proof is claimed. Numerical execution is not asserted. Independent execution is not asserted.

Front matter

  • abstractAbstractFront matter · lines 90–129
    Open as its own page

    We construct a supported local spacetime adaptation of the observation-boundary contract of VII-E and the finite hybrid-channel contract of VII-G. The two contracts are proved independently within one laboratory on I-B's prescribed conical Lorentzian product. For the observation boundary, we prove the effect-pullback criterion, its reference-stable form, the exact sharp-measurement coherence criterion, and a qubit separation of trace distance between ideal residual targets with identical records. For hybrid evolution, we prove a complete branch representation, history-sensitive observation closure, spectator consistency, and the exact recovery–constant-complement criterion. An informative classical record consequently excludes recovery of every unknown quantum input, even when the declared residual is also available.

    The additional contribution is an end-to-end finite observation package that keeps these distinctions visible in supplied spacetime. We provide a compactly supported -dimensional lift of a four-face transverse adjacency exchange, an exact guarded reversible encoding, and a separately constructed qubit instrument selecting strictly ordered slices without changing the conical metric. A two-step specialization has two histories with the same terminal slice but different conditional residuals. After coarse aggregation, the record remains unchanged while two complete residual targets have the exact half-diamond gap . An explicit residual audit enlarges the required input observation space from the diagonal algebra to the full qubit algebra.

    A destructive finite clock, complete-channel approximation bounds, and a causal route for both payload and classical control complete the local Grade S construction. The package may serve as a precise testbed for distinguishing record-level claims from instrument-level claims in geometric feedback models. The channel and recovery principles themselves are established finite-dimensional facts; the claimed contribution is their supported assembly and the explicit certificates and separations. No metric emergence, gravitational dynamics, field instrument, radiative coefficient, or quantum Ward identity is constructed.

  • scopeTwo contracts, one laboratoryFront matter · lines 131–139
    Open as its own page

    contracts, one laboratory{ The VII-E contract concerns what a declared observation boundary can distinguish. The VII-G contract concerns a state-independent finite completely positive hybrid evolution. Neither contract derives the cone, and neither is a premise supplying the other.

    The four-face exchange is an illustration, not an assumption of the general channel theorems. Matter-controlled slicing is not matter-driven gravitational dynamics.}

Introduction, provenance, and the Enter philosophy

  • sectionIntroduction, provenance, and the Enter philosophyIntroduction, provenance, and the Enter philosophy · lines 145–168
    Open as its own page

    A probability law for a classical record does not specify the selective transformation of the surviving quantum system. Likewise, preservation of one named expectation does not imply recovery of every input. These distinctions are basic to the instrument formulation of quantum measurement DaviesLewis,Choi,Watrous.

    This paper places two source contracts in a common supported spacetime presentation:

    1. VII-E's observation boundary, residual separation, spectator condition, and four-face certificate CheungVIIE;

    2. VII-G's finite direct-sum channel, branchwise observation criterion, recovery obstruction, and ordered-slice model CheungVIIG.

    Their mathematical statements are reproved below. Citation does not replace a proof, identify two models, or provide missing geometric dynamics.

  • sectionEnter and its spacetime interfaceIntroduction, provenance, and the Enter philosophy › Enter and its spacetime interface · lines 169–196
    Open as its own page

    In Cheung's Enter calculus, runtime quantum names are access rights to tensor factors. Destructive computational-basis readout consumes the measured names and returns classical records. Unmeasured factors can remain available CheungEnter,CheungI. The characterization of the Born strategy in Manuscript I concerns its explicitly specified class and five requirements. We use a specified Born instrument and prove its channel formula; we do not rederive that characterization or extend it to quantum fields.

    The accompanying philosophy distinguishes:

    An output type does not determine the fate of all physical degrees of freedom used by an apparatus, and a channel does not specify a thermal machine CheungPhilosophy.

    I-B supplies a finite operational interface on a prescribed conical spacetime CheungIB. A finite clock can be calibrated to its time coordinate, destructively read, and used for causal control. The geometric time axis, defect worldsheet, and future cone remain after that clock is consumed.

  • definitionDefinition: Local Grade SIntroduction, provenance, and the Enter philosophy › Enter and its spacetime interface · VII-E-ST@1#def:grade · lines 197–213
    Open as its own page

    A local Grade S observation package specifies and proves:

    1. a prescribed Lorentzian background and a supported regular laboratory;

    2. named observation and evolution contracts, with their mathematical domains;

    3. a complete finite destructive-clock instrument;

    4. a declared finite encoding of labels and selected residual observations;

    5. reference-preserving transport with complete dependencies embedded in the supplied causal relation.

    Grade E would additionally require a construction deriving the geometric data from operational records. It is not claimed.

  • sectionEnter and its spacetime interfaceIntroduction, provenance, and the Enter philosophy › Enter and its spacetime interface · lines 213–223
    Open as its own page

    boundary. Direct-sum state spaces, Kraus representations, deferred readout, and exact quantum error correction are not new general theorems Choi,GurevichBlass,KnillLaflamme. The contribution here is a supported assembly with explicit geometric and finite-channel witnesses, including the equal-slice residual separation proved in Section sec:two-step.

Prescribed conical geometry and supported presentation

  • sectionPrescribed conical geometry and supported presentationPrescribed conical geometry and supported presentation · VII-E-ST@1#eq:cone · lines 225–245
    Open as its own page

    Fix

    The physical smooth background is

    where and is periodic with period . Its completion has the conical worldsheet

    No smooth Einstein tensor is assigned on .

  • propositionProposition: Geometry and local rodsPrescribed conical geometry and supported presentation · VII-E-ST@1#prop:geometry · proof attached · lines 246–282
    Open as its own page

    The metric has signature . Choose as future directed. A nonzero future-causal vector satisfies

    Static observers have proper time , so the proper-time lapse is one.

    On a sufficiently small lifted angular interval,

    is a local isometry to Minkowski space. Its spatial coordinates give three local rods.

    In the inverse-deck convention the peripheral affine gluing is

    It has neither time nor axial translation.

    Proof. The signature and causal inequality follow from the diagonal metric. Setting proves the proper-time statement. The local-isometry identity is

    A positive angular lift around the apex advances through ; the inverse deck map closes it by rotation through . Its time and axial coordinates do not change.

  • propositionProposition: Failure of global hyperbolicityPrescribed conical geometry and supported presentation · VII-E-ST@1#prop:nonGH · proof attached · lines 284–296
    Open as its own page

    The regular product is not globally hyperbolic.

    Proof. Fix , an angle, and . Let have that spatial position and times and . For , the events lie in , by radial causal travel. They have no convergent subsequence in . Thus this causal diamond is not compact.

  • definitionDefinition: Supported laboratoryPrescribed conical geometry and supported presentation · VII-E-ST@1#def:presentation · lines 298–314
    Open as its own page

    A supported presentation consists of:

    1. a regular developing chart and a relatively compact laboratory region with closure disjoint from ;

    2. compact spatial collars, finite marked cells, and compactly supported tests used by the declared observations;

    3. finite quantum and classical registers, their locations, and every controller variable inspected by an operation;

    4. a finite schedule with explicit input and output ports and no undeclared incoming boundary inputs.

    Any background exterior labels are fixed metadata. No global Cauchy theorem, Green operator, or intrinsic conical field theory is part of this presentation.

  • sectionPrescribed conical geometry and supported presentationPrescribed conical geometry and supported presentation · lines 314–321
    Open as its own page

    All matrix theorems below are independent of a field equation. Developed charts, polygonal markings, and collars pull back through the stated local isometry. They are not declarations that the physical spacetime is global Minkowski space.

Contract E: readout, records, and residuals

  • sectionContract E: readout, records, and residualsContract E: readout, records, and residuals · lines 323–340
    Open as its own page

    For a finite-dimensional Hilbert space , write for its operators. A channel is a completely positive, trace-preserving linear map. Adjoint maps use the pairing

    We use

    A classical register is jointly block diagonal in its designated basis, including its correlations with all other registers. A diagonal marginal alone does not establish classicality.

  • definitionDefinition: Destructive readoutContract E: readout, records, and residuals › Distinct interfaces · VII-E-ST@1#def:destructive, VII-E-ST@1#eq:destructive · lines 343–354
    Open as its own page

    Let have computational basis , with unmeasured complement . Put . Destructive readout is

    Its quantum output contains , not . The measured names are consumed.

  • definitionDefinition: Coherent recordingContract E: readout, records, and residuals › Distinct interfaces · VII-E-ST@1#def:coherent · lines 356–367
    Open as its own page

    A fresh quantum carrier can record the computational basis through

    The channel returns . It is not destructive readout and not cloning: .

  • definitionDefinition: Represented instrument and external labelsContract E: readout, records, and residuals › Distinct interfaces · VII-E-ST@1#def:represented · lines 369–383
    Open as its own page

    With , the represented nondestructive sharp instrument is

    It can be implemented using a fresh pointer and destructive readout of that pointer. The original is returned.

    An external geometric label is classical metadata describing a marking, chart, certificate, or location. A dictionary from measurement outcomes to such labels is an additional input. It is not one of the preceding quantum maps.

  • sectionDistinct interfacesContract E: readout, records, and residuals › Distinct interfaces · lines 383–387
    Open as its own page

    These distinctions prevent a represented residual qubit from being described as the return of a consumed quantum name.

  • sectionExact record and instrument criteriaContract E: readout, records, and residuals › Exact record and instrument criteria · VII-E-ST@1#eq:two-targets · lines 388–408
    Open as its own page

    Let be a finite projective resolution of , let aggregate fine outcomes, and put

    Let be a channel and an instrument on , with . Compare

    This comparison uses represented fine projections on a common input space. For a genuinely destructive protocol, any subsequent removal or identification of must be included explicitly in ; it is not hidden in .

  • theoremTheorem: Effect pullback and the full residual criterionContract E: readout, records, and residuals › Exact record and instrument criteria · VII-E-ST@1#thm:pullback, VII-E-ST@1#eq:record-pullback, VII-E-ST@1#eq:residual-pullback · proof attached · lines 409–444
    Open as its own page

    The record marginals of and agree for every input state if and only if

    For an observation space , agreement on every observable , , is equivalent to

    Both are equalities of linear maps on the declared observation spaces and remain valid after tensoring with any untouched reference identity.

    Proof. The fine aggregated probability is

    while the coarse probability is . Equality against all states is equality of Hermitian effects.

    The two -conditioned expectations of pull back to the two sides of (eq:residual-pullback). States separate Hermitian matrices, and complex linearity gives the general equality. Tensoring an equality of linear maps with a reference identity preserves it.

  • sectionExact record and instrument criteriaContract E: readout, records, and residuals › Exact record and instrument criteria · VII-E-ST@1#eq:event-norm · lines 444–458
    Open as its own page

    The following useful error formula is record-only and unassisted:

    Indeed, total variation is the maximum absolute difference on an outcome event. Interchange the finite maximum with the state supremum and use for Hermitian . No equality with an assisted channel error is inferred.

  • theoremTheorem: Residual obstruction and its robust formContract E: readout, records, and residuals › Exact record and instrument criteria · VII-E-ST@1#thm:residual-obstruction · proof attached · lines 459–488
    Open as its own page

    Record compatibility does not determine a residual instrument. There are ideal targets with identical records on every input whose outputs have trace distance on one qubit input.

    If implemented versions have errors at most on that input, their mutual distance is at least

    Proof. Take , , the computational projectors, and one coarse outcome with . Both record effects are . For ,

    Their difference has residual block

    with eigenvalues . Its trace norm is one. The robust bound is the triangle inequality.

  • sectionExact record and instrument criteriaContract E: readout, records, and residuals › Exact record and instrument criteria · lines 488–494
    Open as its own page

    The fine residual is realized by a pointer measurement returning the qubit; it is not primitive destructive readout of that qubit. Improving implementations cannot make distinct ideal target channels equal.

  • sectionThe exact sharp-measurement criterionContract E: readout, records, and residuals › The exact sharp-measurement criterion · lines 495–507
    Open as its own page

    Suppose now that is projective and that the coarse instrument is Lüders:

    Define the two pinching maps

  • lemmaLemma: Sharp-sector intertwiningContract E: readout, records, and residuals › The exact sharp-measurement criterion · VII-E-ST@1#lem:sharp · proof attached · lines 508–530
    Open as its own page

    Under (eq:record-pullback), every Kraus operator of satisfies

    Consequently

    Proof. For ,

    Thus . For , the same calculation with gives . Combine the two identities.

  • theoremTheorem: Lüders compatibilityContract E: readout, records, and residuals › The exact sharp-measurement criterion · VII-E-ST@1#thm:luders · proof attached · lines 532–562
    Open as its own page

    Under the sharp hypotheses and record compatibility, the following are equivalent:

    1. as complete recorded residual channels;

    2. ;

    Thus full compatibility removes fine coherence within each coarse outcome. It need not remove coherence between different coarse outcomes.

    Proof. By Lemma lem:sharp, the -block of is . Its difference from the corresponding -block consists exactly of the fine off-diagonal corners within .

    Summing the -blocks gives (ii). Conversely, their output supports lie in orthogonal -corners, so a zero sum makes each corner zero. Testing a single proves necessity of (iii), and expansion into corners proves sufficiency.

  • sectionThe exact sharp-measurement criterionContract E: readout, records, and residuals › The exact sharp-measurement criterion · lines 562–569
    Open as its own page

    For injective , record compatibility already suffices. For one coarse outcome, the criterion is . These are finite instrument identities, not field-instrument constructions.

Continuations, deferred readout, and spectator blindness

  • sectionContinuations, deferred readout, and spectator blindnessContinuations, deferred readout, and spectator blindness · lines 571–578
    Open as its own page

    An observation space is a complex linear, adjoint-closed subspace containing the identity. It need not be an algebra. Write when the two states agree against every element of .

  • theoremTheorem: Compositional observation boundaryContinuations, deferred readout, and spectator blindness · VII-E-ST@1#thm:composition, VII-E-ST@1#eq:adjoint-inclusion · proof attached · lines 579–619
    Open as its own page

    For a channel and observation spaces , the following are equivalent:

    and

    If this inclusion holds successively, compatible continuations preserve the declared agreement.

    The reference-stable comparison of two extended inputs requires agreement on , not merely agreement of their unreferenced marginals.

    Proof. Sufficiency follows by pulling each output observable back. For necessity, take a Hermitian matrix annihilating under the trace pairing. Since , . For a faithful state , both and are states for sufficiently small . They agree on , hence

    Finite-dimensional double orthogonal complementation gives the inclusion. Complex linearity completes the proof. Tensoring the inclusion proves the reference statement.

  • theoremTheorem: Restricted deferred readoutContinuations, deferred readout, and spectator blindness · VII-E-ST@1#thm:deferred, VII-E-ST@1#eq:deferred · proof attached · lines 621–659
    Open as its own page

    Let be a complete Kraus family and unitaries on the surviving system. Immediate pointer readout followed by , and coherent controlled followed by pointer readout, implement the same recorded instrument:

    This identity is complete under references.

    For coherent copying of an original computational register, agreement with destructive readout holds only after both outputs are restricted to the same record–matter interface. A retained coherent carrier is not an additional common output.

    Proof. The isometry

    satisfies . Controlled feedback changes it to . Destructive readout of gives (eq:deferred). The immediate implementation has the same selective maps.

    For computational copying, write . After coherent copying and label-preserving controlled operations, final readout and restriction to the common interface retain precisely the diagonal blocks . If both copied measured registers are consumed, the duplicate classical outcome can be explicitly forgotten. No quantum return of a consumed register is involved.

  • sectionContinuations, deferred readout, and spectator blindnessContinuations, deferred readout, and spectator blindness · lines 659–667
    Open as its own page

    A continuation that reads a phase-sensitive observable of the coherent carrier, or rewrites the controller using that carrier, is outside this equivalence. Deferred-measurement principles require the corresponding interface and control hypotheses GurevichBlass. They do not make remote control instantaneous or preserve an implementation's storage cost automatically.

  • sectionThe first spectator theoremContinuations, deferred readout, and spectator blindness › The first spectator theorem · lines 668–685
    Open as its own page

    For Contract E, allow a classical configuration

    where is a geometric label, the original accessible interface, a controller state, and assigns abstract cell labels to names. A geometric rule changes declared geometric data and location labels. A matter rule applies a declared channel. A coupling rule may inspect a declared state functional and update a classical label.

    Such a coupling function need not be affine. Contract E's equal-input comparison does not by itself make it a quantum channel.

  • assumptionAssumption: Complete spectator blindnessContinuations, deferred readout, and spectator blindness › The first spectator theorem · VII-E-ST@1#ass:blind · lines 686–695
    Open as its own page

    Adding inaccessible spectator names does not alter: the chosen rule or channel, exact guards, capacity checks, certificates, successor labels, controller updates, or transport of original names. Spectator storage and any required spectator location history are reserved separately. The controller does not inspect spectator outcomes or spectator cardinality.

  • theoremTheorem: Spectator consistency for Contract EContinuations, deferred readout, and spectator blindness › The first spectator theorem · VII-E-ST@1#thm:spectators-E, VII-E-ST@1#eq:restriction · proof attached · lines 697–725
    Open as its own page

    Under Assumption ass:blind, compare a finite execution with an extension satisfying on the original accessible interface. Use the same initial geometric and control labels and original-name locations.

    At every step the executions have the same geometric trace, the same accessible reduced matter state, and the same original-name locations. The spectator extension may initially be entangled.

    Proof. For any linear map ,

    This follows by expansion in matrix units on . A matter step therefore preserves equality of accessible reductions. Equal reductions give equal declared state functionals, so geometric and coupling steps choose the same successors. Blindness makes guards, certificates, and resource checks identical, and the same fixed location maps apply. Induction proves the assertion.

  • sectionThe first spectator theoremContinuations, deferred readout, and spectator blindness › The first spectator theorem · lines 725–732
    Open as its own page

    This compares an extension with its restriction. It does not assert that all extensions with one marginal have identical joint reference correlations, or that selective conditioning cannot steer an untouched spectator.

A four-face certificate and its supported 3+1 lift

  • sectionA four-face certificate and its supported 3+1 liftA four-face certificate and its supported 3+1 lift · lines 734–747
    Open as its own page

    This section supplies an illustration independently of the general observation proofs. The numerical transverse family is the one recorded in VII-E CheungVIIE; its required properties are proved here.

    Specialize the prescribed deficit to . Use a regular developed patch in the first quadrant, centered at developed spatial coordinates , and write its local coordinates as . Set . Numerical lengths below use one fixed length unit.

  • sectionTransverse faces, edge laws, and affine chartsA four-face certificate and its supported 3+1 lift › Transverse faces, edge laws, and affine charts · VII-E-ST@1#eq:fourplanes · lines 748–763
    Open as its own page

    Put

    For , define

    Label the four affine dominance regions .

  • lemmaLemma: Central exchangeA four-face certificate and its supported 3+1 lift › Transverse faces, edge laws, and affine charts · VII-E-ST@1#lem:central, VII-E-ST@1#eq:central-edges · proof attached · lines 764–800
    Open as its own page

    The graph is piecewise spacelike and -Lipschitz. For ,

    Its central edge is

    At the central edge becomes one four-face junction. No transverse face disappears there.

    Proof. Each affine spatial gradient has norm at most . Their maximum has the same Lipschitz bound. A tangent to a face of slope has squared norm

    All four functions increase with at rate at least .

    For , equality forces , and dominance over is , possible precisely on the incoming side. For , equality forces , with . The edge tangents have constant , so their lengths are the displayed Euclidean coordinate intervals. At , each strict-dominance region contains an open cone.

  • sectionTransverse faces, edge laws, and affine chartsA four-face certificate and its supported 3+1 lift › Transverse faces, edge laws, and affine charts · VII-E-ST@1#eq:charts · lines 800–842
    Open as its own page

    The rates

    show transversality. The four mixed adjacencies persist and satisfy in their respective quadrants.

    Use the following -dimensional Lorentz matrices, extended by the identity on :

    Direct multiplication verifies Lorentz orthogonality, determinant one, and future orientation. On each corresponding plane the transformed time coordinate is .

    Set . Every closed ordered core word is the identity, since

    This proves the incoming triple, outgoing triple, and event word identities without interpreting the nontrivial frame changes as curvature.

  • sectionCompact transverse collarA four-face certificate and its supported 3+1 lift › Compact transverse collar · VII-E-ST@1#eq:transverse-cap · lines 843–881
    Open as its own page

    Let

    The nonhorizontal region is

    Take

    The collar margins are

    They are strictly positive throughout the parameter window.

    The northeast resting collar polygon has spatial vertices

    Reflections give the other three. They partition and lie at . The collar chart is

    and the core charts are . Thus all transitions are , including their translations. Closed mixed words telescope in the full affine group.

  • propositionProposition: Complete transverse noncentral dataA four-face certificate and its supported 3+1 lift › Compact transverse collar · VII-E-ST@1#prop:edge-data · proof attached · lines 882–928
    Open as its own page

    The capped transverse patch has eight two-dimensional faces and 25 actual edges on either regular epoch. Its noncentral edge classes are:

    Every noncentral edge has length greater than . The only transverse incidence change is the central exchange.

    Proof. The vertices are the two central endpoints, four inner corners, four inner side midpoints, four outer corners, and four outer side midpoints. The central edge and four mixed arms, followed by the listed collar edges, exhaust their incidences.

    For the incoming northeast arm, the displacement is in . Its squared norm is . For the outgoing arm use , with squared norm . These give the arm formulas, which agree at zero. All remaining edges are horizontal and have the listed Euclidean lengths.

    The smallest collar-join length is ; the arms exceed . All faces have open interiors: core faces near their inner side midpoints and collar faces by the strict margins. The central dominance calculation then isolates the only transverse incidence change.

  • sectionA genuinely supported 3+1-dimensional markingA four-face certificate and its supported 3+1 lift › A genuinely supported 3+1-dimensional marking · VII-E-ST@1#eq:three-dimensional-cap · lines 930–945
    Open as its own page

    A transverse picture alone is not a compactly supported hypersurface marking in dimensions. Define

    Use the spatial box

  • propositionProposition: Supported liftA four-face certificate and its supported 3+1 lift › A genuinely supported 3+1-dimensional marking · VII-E-ST@1#prop:lift · proof attached · lines 946–984
    Open as its own page

    The graphs are continuous piecewise spacelike hypersurface markings with spatial Lipschitz constant at most . They are strictly ordered:

    They equal near , and coincide with the transverse capped family for .

    They extend by the horizontal marking outside on the regular conical product. The modification has compact spatial support disjoint from .

    Proof. The affine pieces have spatial gradients among

    Minima and maxima preserve the common Lipschitz bound. Their parameter slopes are at least , proving strict ordering.

    For , , while . Thus the lift agrees with (eq:transverse-cap). For , , and the graph is horizontal. Near the lateral boundary of , the transverse collar already has height . This proves boundary matching and compact support.

    Translation by places the entire box in a regular first-quadrant chart of the cone. The local isometry pulls the construction back. Outside the box the marking is unchanged.

  • sectionA genuinely supported 3+1-dimensional markingA four-face certificate and its supported 3+1 lift › A genuinely supported 3+1-dimensional marking · lines 984–1007
    Open as its own page

    For an affine piece , a fully specified adapted chart is the standard Lorentz boost

    followed by time translation . For , use its continuous identity-boost value. Thus every lifted piece has an explicit affine chart, and all closed transition products still telescope.

    The four-face statement concerns the transverse section . In the full lift its junction is extended in the axial direction. We do not relabel it as an isolated -dimensional particle event, nor claim a catalogue of all additional taper incidences.

  • sectionIntrinsic angle defect is not ambient curvatureA four-face certificate and its supported 3+1 lift › Intrinsic angle defect is not ambient curvature · VII-E-ST@1#eq:angle-defect · lines 1008–1041
    Open as its own page

    Let

    At the transverse central event, dot products of the two boundary rays within an -face give cosine ; within an -face they give . The other two faces are reflections. Hence

    To check the sign, , and

    Thus .

    At an incoming triple junction, the two equal face angles have sum , and the remaining angle is . For example the equal-angle cosine is , and the double-angle identity gives that sum. The defect is . The outgoing calculation interchanges the two pairs and has the same result.

    The marking therefore redistributes a transverse intrinsic angle defect while the ambient metric remains fixed and locally flat. This is not a bounce or the creation of spacetime curvature.

  • sectionExact guard, locations, and finite reversible encodingA four-face certificate and its supported 3+1 lift › Exact guard, locations, and finite reversible encoding · VII-E-ST@1#eq:guard, VII-E-ST@1#eq:event-code · lines 1042–1084
    Open as its own page

    Let , denote the two regular transverse epochs and their event germs. At the event, retained central edge slots have zero length and realize the same junction; they are metadata, not regular embedded one-cells.

    The forward event rule has guard

    It changes the mode to one, spends one permission, and chooses the outgoing germ without advancing . A fixed abstract location map sends the incoming central slot and its endpoint labels to the outgoing event-junction slot; persistent labels are unchanged. No physical matter is transported through the patch by this metadata rule. If a spectator has an abstract location there, its location history is separately reserved.

    Fix a finite parameter grid

    stored exactly. Store rounded length reports only as reports. A rounded zero length cannot replace the exact guard: if , floor quantization at resolution reports zero for .

    Let be a tuple of valid location words and its fixed event transport. On valid forward codewords prescribe

    At zero, both central reports are zero and all common noncentral formulas agree, so the report words remain valid.

  • lemmaLemma: Decoder-correct reversible implementationA four-face certificate and its supported 3+1 lift › Exact guard, locations, and finite reversible encoding · VII-E-ST@1#lem:event-code · proof attached · lines 1085–1112
    Open as its own page

    The finite map (eq:event-code) has a permutation extension to the complete binary code space. That permutation has an exact NOT–CNOT–Toffoli implementation with clean work uncomputed. It acts as the identity on internal matter.

    Proof. The output history determines , and its permission determines , so the forward map is injective. Input and output sets are disjoint because their modes differ. Exchange each valid input with its designated output, and fix all other strings. The exchanges are disjoint transpositions. The decoder reads exactly the outgoing germ, spent permission, and transported locations.

    For completeness, any transposition of two -bit strings can be synthesized along a Gray path between them. The symmetric sequence of adjacent transpositions exchanges the endpoints and fixes intermediate strings. An adjacent transposition is a NOT on the differing bit, controlled on all other bits. Negative controls are converted by NOT gates; the conjunction of positive controls is computed with Toffoli gates into clean work, used once, and uncomputed. Apply this construction to the finite transposition list. History is deliberately retained; it is not clean work.

  • sectionExact guard, locations, and finite reversible encodingA four-face certificate and its supported 3+1 lift › Exact guard, locations, and finite reversible encoding · lines 1112–1118
    Open as its own page

    If the code has bits, at most clean conjunction bits suffice for this construction. This is a finite reversible existence proof, not a reported compilation.

  • theoremTheorem: One supported four-face certificateA four-face certificate and its supported 3+1 lift › Exact guard, locations, and finite reversible encoding · VII-E-ST@1#thm:certificate · proof attached · lines 1119–1149
    Open as its own page

    The preceding family supplies a local certificate containing:

    1. piecewise spacelike ordered markings and transverse incoming/outgoing central edge laws;

    2. complete transverse edge data, affine charts, and exact ordered products;

    3. a compact transverse collar and a compactly supported -dimensional lift matching a fixed horizontal exterior;

    4. a transition stratum with exact guard and fixed abstract location transport;

    5. a decoder-correct reversible finite event implementation, with separately charged history and spectator reserves.

    It is a type-A transverse incidence illustration only. It changes neither , , nor .

    Proof. Lemma lem:central supplies (i). The explicit charts and Proposition prop:edge-data supply (ii). The collar construction and Proposition prop:lift supply (iii). The event definitions and Lemma lem:event-code supply (iv)–(v). The construction lies in one regular developing patch and is horizontal near its boundary. It changes no global gluing map or worldsheet data.

  • sectionExact guard, locations, and finite reversible encodingA four-face certificate and its supported 3+1 lift › Exact guard, locations, and finite reversible encoding · lines 1149–1156
    Open as its own page

    The connection with polygonal descriptions of gravity is contextual DJH,CheungVIIE. No polygon Hamiltonian, particle hop, field equation, or global transition catalogue is deduced.

Contract G: finite completely positive hybrid evolution

  • sectionContract G: finite completely positive hybrid evolutionContract G: finite completely positive hybrid evolution · lines 1158–1177
    Open as its own page

    Let be a finite classical label set. Each label contains every variable used by the controller: geometric marking, permission, relevant records, and control memory. Matter occupies a fixed -dimensional space . Set

    States have and . The blocks are subnormalized; their normalization is not part of the unconditional evolution.

    A certified edge includes all changed classical data, exact guards, geometric matching, and location maps. No edge certificate is inferred from its probability alone.

  • theoremTheorem: Finite hybrid structureContract G: finite completely positive hybrid evolution · VII-E-ST@1#thm:structure, VII-E-ST@1#eq:hybrid-map, VII-E-ST@1#eq:branch-complete · proof attached · lines 1178–1225
    Open as its own page

    A linear map between finite direct sums is completely positive and trace preserving exactly when it has branch form

    with

    Its adjoint is

    A canonical channel on the full matrix space has Kraus operators

    It discards off-diagonal input label blocks and produces block-diagonal output. It is a specified lift, not a reconstruction of quantum geometric coherences.

    Proof. After adjoining any matrix ancilla, a positive direct-sum input has positive blocks. Complete positivity of the branches and summation prove complete positivity of . Equation (eq:branch-complete) gives trace preservation.

    Conversely, compose a given completely positive map with injection into input block and projection onto output block . These maps give completely positive branches. For a map between matrix algebras, its Choi matrix is positive; diagonalizing that matrix and unvectorizing its rank-one terms gives the displayed Kraus representation Choi. Trace preservation on each input block gives (eq:branch-complete).

    The adjoint follows by pairing. Multiplication of the lifted Kraus operators gives the full identity as their sum of squared moduli, and their action uses only diagonal input blocks.

  • sectionContract G: finite completely positive hybrid evolutionContract G: finite completely positive hybrid evolution · lines 1225–1244
    Open as its own page

    The table is fixed independently of the current unknown density operator. Matter dependence enters through Born probabilities

    An undeclared state-dependent compiler is not part of this law.

    Composition is explicit:

    Completeness follows by summing its adjoint effects. Certificates concatenate along the declared paths; this does not create a certificate for a previously uncertified edge.

  • theoremTheorem: Hybrid observation criterionContract G: finite completely positive hybrid evolution › Intrinsic observation and histories · VII-E-ST@1#thm:observation · proof attached · lines 1247–1272
    Open as its own page

    For observation spaces in finite direct sums, preservation of agreement for all states is equivalent to

    For and , this is equivalent to

    In particular, successor probabilities depend only on exactly when for every .

    Proof. Use the faithful-state perturbation argument of Theorem thm:composition within the direct-sum algebra. An output observable can have just one nonzero block, proving necessity of every branch inclusion. Summation proves sufficiency. Apply the same argument to the single effect for the final statement.

  • sectionIntrinsic observation and historiesContract G: finite completely positive hybrid evolution › Intrinsic observation and histories · VII-E-ST@1#eq:history · lines 1272–1289
    Open as its own page

    This is the direct-sum specialization of a general adjoint criterion, not a new general channel theorem.

    For a finite sequence of fixed tables and a history , define

    The history map is a channel: each path map is completely positive, and summing the last successor, then the preceding ones, proves trace preservation.

  • theoremTheorem: History-sensitive observationContract G: finite completely positive hybrid evolution › Intrinsic observation and histories · VII-E-ST@1#thm:histories, VII-E-ST@1#eq:history-closure · proof attached · lines 1290–1314
    Open as its own page

    Suppose observation spaces satisfy the branchwise closure

    Initial agreement on implies:

    1. equality of all geometric history probabilities;

    2. agreement of every unnormalized history block on its declared terminal observation space;

    3. agreement of normalized conditional expectations on every positive-probability history.

    Proof. Pull a terminal backward along its fixed history. Repeated application of (eq:history-closure) places the pullback in . Pairing proves (ii); proves (i). Divide by the same positive probability for (iii).

  • sectionIntrinsic observation and historiesContract G: finite completely positive hybrid evolution › Intrinsic observation and histories · lines 1314–1320
    Open as its own page

    Branch closure is necessary for the corresponding universal one-step comparison at every node, by Theorem thm:observation. It is not asserted necessary for accidental agreement on one input or one terminal test.

  • exampleExample: An aggregate continuation can hide branch failureContract G: finite completely positive hybrid evolution › Intrinsic observation and histories · VII-E-ST@1#ex:branch-failure · lines 1321–1339
    Open as its own page

    Let the input observation algebra be . Let

    where is the Hadamard matrix. The summed channel has zero output -expectation on every input, so it preserves agreement for that terminal observation. But

    The inputs and agree on the input diagonal algebra and have the same outcome probabilities, yet their conditioned -expectations differ.

  • propositionProposition: Minimal backward boundaryContract G: finite completely positive hybrid evolution › Intrinsic observation and histories · VII-E-ST@1#prop:minimal · proof attached · lines 1341–1374
    Open as its own page

    For a fixed horizon and terminal observation spaces, define

    These are the smallest observation spaces satisfying (eq:history-closure). Agreement on their initial direct sum is equivalent to agreement of all complete history-conditioned terminal expectations.

    For a stationary table and geometry-only reports, iteration from stabilizes after at most strict enlargements. The stable space characterizes agreement of all finite geometric history laws.

    Proof. Adjoints preserve adjoints, so the recursively defined spans are observation spaces. Any closed family must contain these spans, proving minimality. The recursively generated elements are precisely spans of pathwise pullbacks. The inserted identity contributes no independent condition because .

    For stationary iteration, the sum of dimensions starts at and is at most . An iteration without enlargement is already fixed. Path effects generate exactly the stable space.

  • sectionIntrinsic observation and historiesContract G: finite completely positive hybrid evolution › Intrinsic observation and histories · lines 1374–1379
    Open as its own page

    No multiplicative closure is required. Replacing the minimal space by its generated algebra may expose more information than the chosen histories need.

  • theoremTheorem: Spectator consistency for Contract GContract G: finite completely positive hybrid evolution › Intrinsic observation and histories · VII-E-ST@1#thm:spectators-G · proof attached · lines 1380–1399
    Open as its own page

    Assume complete spectator blindness and an initial extension with for every . For every complete history,

    Thus all history laws, restricted unnormalized residual blocks, certificates, and original-name locations agree.

    Proof. Equation (eq:restriction) applies to each selective branch. Induction along a path proves the block identity. The hypotheses retain the same path labels, exact guards, controller tables, and certificates. The assertion includes zero-probability paths as zero blocks.

Recovery obstruction, deterministic packets, and balance

  • sectionRecovery obstruction, deterministic packets, and balanceRecovery obstruction, deterministic packets, and balance · lines 1403–1409
    Open as its own page

    The recovery theorem in this section concerns the entire quantum input algebra , not merely one observable or a classical subset of states.

  • theoremTheorem: Exact recovery and a constant complementRecovery obstruction, deterministic packets, and balance · VII-E-ST@1#thm:decouple · proof attached · lines 1410–1467
    Open as its own page

    Let be a finite-dimensional channel. The following are equivalent:

    1. a channel satisfies ;

    2. a complementary channel is constant: ;

    3. its Kraus operators satisfy

      for a positive matrix ;

    4. after unitary mixing of Kraus operators,

    All recovery identities hold completely under references.

    Proof. A Kraus dilation gives

    so (ii) and (iii) are equivalent.

    Suppose has Kraus operators . The composed Kraus operators represent the identity channel. Its Choi matrix has rank one, so every . Consequently

    This proves (i)(iii).

    Diagonalize the positive matrix by a unitary mixing of the Kraus operators. Nonzero transformed operators have products . Set , obtaining (iv). Their range projections are orthogonal. With , the map

    is completely positive and trace preserving for any fixed state . It recovers every matrix unit and hence every operator. Tensoring the identity proves complete recovery.

  • sectionRecovery obstruction, deterministic packets, and balanceRecovery obstruction, deterministic packets, and balance · lines 1467–1472
    Open as its own page

    This is the full-input form of the standard error-correction and information–disturbance structure KnillLaflamme,KSW; the explicit proof fixes our domain.

  • corollaryCorollary: An informative classical record prevents full recoveryRecovery obstruction, deterministic packets, and balance · VII-E-ST@1#cor:informative · proof attached · lines 1473–1496
    Open as its own page

    For an instrument with recorded channel

    if some effect is not scalar, no channel recovers every input from the entire recorded output, including its residual.

    Proof. Choose branch Kraus operators . A dilation can duplicate the classical outcome into its environment:

    The environmental marginal has outcome- probability . A constant complement would make this probability independent of every input, requiring . Apply Theorem thm:decouple.

  • sectionRecovery obstruction, deterministic packets, and balanceRecovery obstruction, deterministic packets, and balance · lines 1496–1507
    Open as its own page

    A constant record law is necessary, not sufficient, for full recovery. A replacement channel has a constant record and is not reversible. Conversely, random unitary branches with input-independent recorded probabilities can be corrected using the record.

    The corollary does not prohibit copying already classical data. It also does not preclude recovery on a proper code subspace or preservation of a named commutative algebra.

  • propositionProposition: Deterministic packet selectionRecovery obstruction, deterministic packets, and balance · VII-E-ST@1#prop:affine · proof attached · lines 1508–1519
    Open as its own page

    Let a convex domain of states be mapped affinely to classical probability distributions. If every output is a point mass, the output label is constant.

    Proof. If have different point-mass outputs, an interior convex combination has the corresponding nontrivial mixture, not a point mass.

  • sectionRecovery obstruction, deterministic packets, and balanceRecovery obstruction, deterministic packets, and balance · lines 1519–1528
    Open as its own page

    Thus a nonconstant deterministic expectation-to-packet rule, such as the comparison called Option N, cannot be promoted unchanged to the unconditional classical output of an affine channel. Such a nonlinear rule may be studied under a different contract. A supplied source token is not a measurement extracting an expectation from unknown matter CheungPackets.

  • propositionProposition: Operator balance and resource balanceRecovery obstruction, deterministic packets, and balance · VII-E-ST@1#prop:energy, VII-E-ST@1#eq:operator-balance · proof attached · lines 1529–1561
    Open as its own page

    For declared Hermitian observables , preservation of their expected value for every hybrid input is equivalent to

    The branch intertwinings are sufficient. A uniform operator defect at most gives a one-step expectation error at most , and at most after steps for one common observable.

    Separately, if a permission function and edge costs satisfy

    on every supported branch, then each history obeys

    Proof. Pair with every state supported in one block. The branch sufficiency follows by summing . For a normalized hybrid state, the absolute defect expectation is bounded by the largest block operator norm. Iteration proves the accumulated bound. The resource identity telescopes pathwise.

  • sectionRecovery obstruction, deterministic packets, and balanceRecovery obstruction, deterministic packets, and balance · lines 1561–1567
    Open as its own page

    Calling “energy” does not provide a physical Hamiltonian, reservoir, work budget, or Einstein equation. Permission costs are not automatically physical energies.

A finite model selecting ordered slices

  • sectionA finite model selecting ordered slicesA finite model selecting ordered slices · VII-E-ST@1#eq:labels, VII-E-ST@1#eq:slice-time · lines 1569–1598
    Open as its own page

    This construction does not use the four-face family or its event rule. It uses only the prescribed conical product and finite matrices, adapting the ordered-slice example of VII-G CheungVIIG.

    Fix an integer , physical times and , and define

    A label denotes the horizontal regular marking

    The nominal controller tick , selected slice time , and physical times of local gate implementations are different declared quantities.

    For , set

    At , use an absorbing identity branch.

  • lemmaLemma: Certificate for every successorA finite model selecting ordered slices · VII-E-ST@1#lem:slice-certificate · proof attached · lines 1599–1618
    Open as its own page

    Every successor is an admitted label and advances the selected slice time by . Each marking is embedded and spacelike on the regular product. The same spatial cells and any fixed compact regular collar are used on every label. Original-name cell transport is the identity, permission decreases by one, and the complete peripheral affine word remains .

    Proof. The bounds and parity in (eq:labels) are preserved. A horizontal slice has induced metric equal to the spatial metric of (eq:cone). Formula (eq:slice-time) gives the positive increment. Horizontal time translation commutes with ; it creates no time or axial shift in the peripheral word. No spatial cell or conical parameter changes.

  • sectionA finite model selecting ordered slicesA finite model selecting ordered slices · VII-E-ST@1#eq:phases, VII-E-ST@1#eq:model-branches · lines 1618–1643
    Open as its own page

    Only compact regular portions are used by the operations. The extension of a marking toward the completion is background metadata, not an interaction with and not a claim that these slices are global Cauchy surfaces.

    Let matter be one qubit. Set

    and

    For an active input ,

  • propositionProposition: Source, observation, and coherenceA finite model selecting ordered slices · VII-E-ST@1#prop:model-formulas · proof attached · lines 1644–1685
    Open as its own page

    The branches are complete and their probabilities are

    The diagonal algebra is branchwise invariant under the adjoints. All geometric history laws therefore depend only on the initial populations.

    Before feedback, the summed source channel preserves populations and multiplies off-diagonal entries by

    For , one active increment has

    Also the unconditional observable identity is

    Proof. The effects are positive and sum to the identity, proving completeness and the probabilities. All branch matrices are diagonal, proving adjoint closure. Their two eigenvalue cross products each equal ; their squared eigenvalues sum to one on each sector. This gives the coherence factor.

    The increment is ; its second moment is , proving the moment formulas. Finally, commutes with every branch matrix and , giving the operator identity.

  • sectionA finite model selecting ordered slicesA finite model selecting ordered slices · lines 1685–1703
    Open as its own page

    Conservation of this named observable is compatible with information acquisition and failure of universal recovery. It is not conservation of an unspecified physical energy. Normalized postselected branches need not preserve its unconditional input mean.

    For a length- active history, all branch matrices commute. On a sector , the outcome probabilities are

    Thus diagonal inputs give a classical chain with fixed hidden sector . General inputs give the mixture of the two sector history laws, weighted by their initial populations. The outcomes are independent conditional on , not generally after mixing the sectors.

  • propositionProposition: Exact finite diagonal comparisonA finite model selecting ordered slices · VII-E-ST@1#prop:diagonal, VII-E-ST@1#eq:diagonal-comparison · proof attached · lines 1704–1727
    Open as its own page

    For a start at one label and , let . Then

    The geometric history laws agree exactly.

    Proof. In each history block the difference is a Hermitian off-diagonal pair. Its trace-distance contribution is the absolute value of one off-diagonal entry. Each source step multiplies that entry by ; feedback changes only its phase. There are active histories. Summing gives (eq:diagonal-comparison). Off-diagonal entries have zero trace in every history.

  • sectionA finite model selecting ordered slicesA finite model selecting ordered slices · lines 1727–1744
    Open as its own page

    A fresh pointer qubit implements each source isometry

    It extends to a unitary on pointer plus matter by completing orthonormal bases. Readout consumes the pointer, returns the matter, and writes one classical history bit. Immediate and locally deferred feedback give identical full instruments by Theorem thm:deferred.

    The classical successor is chosen only after its required record is available. The local deferral identity does not replace the intermediate geometric label by a coherent superposition of geometries.

  • theoremTheorem: Finite observation-compatible modelA finite model selecting ordered slices · VII-E-ST@1#thm:finite-model · proof attached · lines 1745–1777
    Open as its own page

    The model (eq:labels)–(eq:model-branches) has:

    1. state-independent completely positive trace-preserving hybrid evolution;

    2. a certificate for every nonzero branch, without postselection;

    3. source-sensitive successor probabilities for and nontrivial coherent feedback for ;

    4. branchwise population-observation closure, complete history laws, and spectator consistency;

    5. full-instrument-equivalent immediate and locally deferred implementations;

    6. exactly source attempts after hybrid ticks, one permission per attempt, and at most retained outcome bits.

    The cone, deficit, worldsheet, and peripheral affine gluing are unchanged.

    Proof. Completeness and Theorem thm:structure prove (i). Lemma lem:slice-certificate proves (ii). The explicit effect and phase formulas prove (iii). Theorems thm:histories and thm:spectators-G apply to the diagonal branch matrices and blind fixed controller, proving (iv). The pointer calculation proves (v). The resource decreases once per active branch and no attempt is made at , proving (vi).

  • sectionA finite model selecting ordered slicesA finite model selecting ordered slices · lines 1777–1783
    Open as its own page

    There is no changing deficit, moving singular source, field equation, or matter-driven gravitational dynamics. The source and feedback are finite operational prescriptions.

Equal terminal slices with unequal residuals

  • sectionEqual terminal slices with unequal residualsEqual terminal slices with unequal residuals · VII-E-ST@1#eq:path-table · lines 1785–1811
    Open as its own page

    The following exact specialization connects the two contracts without identifying them.

    Take , start at , and choose . Then

    The two-step path Kraus operators are

    Their effects sum to : the two outer effects are , , and each middle effect is .

  • propositionProposition: A finite equal-slice residual separationEqual terminal slices with unequal residuals · VII-E-ST@1#prop:equal-slice · proof attached · lines 1812–1838
    Open as its own page

    For input , the histories and :

    1. have equal probability ;

    2. select the same terminal marking ;

    3. have conditional residual states of trace distance .

    Nevertheless the complete geometric history law is identical for and .

    Proof. The two middle effects give (i), and their terminal gives (ii). Their normalized residuals are

    For equatorial qubit pure states with these relative phases, their overlap has modulus ; their trace distance is . Equivalently, subtract their matrices. The final assertion follows from their equal input populations.

  • sectionEqual terminal slices with unequal residualsEqual terminal slices with unequal residuals · lines 1838–1849
    Open as its own page

    Now retain only the coarse terminal label . Let aggregate the actual middle path maps. Define a second complete instrument with the same two outer branches, but middle branch

    The middle effect is still , so the two instruments have the same coarse record law on every input.

  • theoremTheorem: Exact coarse-record instrument gapEqual terminal slices with unequal residuals · VII-E-ST@1#thm:coarse-gap, VII-E-ST@1#eq:exact-gap · proof attached · lines 1850–1880
    Open as its own page

    The two coarse instruments satisfy

    The input already attains this distance without a reference.

    Proof. Write and . The actual middle map is

    This follows by adding the two phase conjugations in (eq:path-table); off-diagonal entries acquire . Only the middle recorded block differs. The diamond norm of is two: the channel-difference upper bound is two, and gives orthogonal outputs. Multiplying by and using half-diamond normalization proves (eq:exact-gap).

  • sectionEqual terminal slices with unequal residualsEqual terminal slices with unequal residuals · lines 1880–1886
    Open as its own page

    As in Theorem thm:residual-obstruction, implementation errors subtract from this ideal gap by the triangle inequality. This is an incompatibility of declared targets, not a hardware defect.

  • propositionProposition: A residual audit enlarges the boundaryEqual terminal slices with unequal residuals · VII-E-ST@1#prop:audit-boundary · proof attached · lines 1887–1910
    Open as its own page

    The initial diagonal algebra is sufficient for all geometric histories in the two-step model. If the fine-history residual observable is additionally audited on every branch, the minimal initial observation space is the full algebra .

    Proof. The diagonal sufficiency was proved above. For the two middle histories,

    are times rotations of through opposite angles in the plane. Their sum and difference span . The history effects already span . The minimal backward construction of Proposition prop:minimal therefore gives all four qubit matrix directions.

  • sectionEqual terminal slices with unequal residualsEqual terminal slices with unequal residuals · lines 1910–1916
    Open as its own page

    One cannot treat coherence as inaccessible for source control and simultaneously claim that a later coherence audit needs no enlargement of the observation boundary.

Finite clock, residual audit, and encoding limits

  • sectionFinite clock, residual audit, and encoding limitsFinite clock, residual audit, and encoding limits · lines 1918–1926
    Open as its own page

    Let the clock have dimension , with orthonormal calibration basis . Let denote the surviving finite payload. Apply the basis change taking to , then destructively read all clock names.

  • theoremTheorem: Complete destructive clockFinite clock, residual audit, and encoding limits · VII-E-ST@1#thm:instrument, VII-E-ST@1#eq:clock-instrument, VII-E-ST@1#eq:clock-audit · proof attached · lines 1927–1964
    Open as its own page

    With ,

    is a channel. It returns the classical code and the subnormalized conditional payload, including every untouched reference. It consumes the quantum clock names and obeys

    If an outcome-selected residual instrument has operators with , the complete clock–audit map is

    Proof. The clock Kraus operators are . Their squared moduli sum to . Expansion in the calibration basis proves the partial-trace formula. Summing the diagonal clock blocks proves the record-discard identity. The audit Kraus family is also complete by its stated normalization. All equalities hold on matrix units and remain valid under reference extension.

  • sectionFinite clock, residual audit, and encoding limitsFinite clock, residual audit, and encoding limits · lines 1964–1970
    Open as its own page

    The geometry does not occur in this proof. The agreement with I-B's interface is by the explicit formula, not by treating a clock code as the metric CheungIB.

  • sectionA finite payload for both separationsFinite clock, residual audit, and encoding limits › A finite payload for both separations · lines 1971–2015
    Open as its own page

    Use a two-qubit clock for the four histories of (eq:path-table), with a declared dictionary from its basis labels to:

    • the fine history and its coarse terminal slice;

    • its finite branch certificate ;

    • a selected residual audit, for example the -measurement with projectors .

    The -audit can be represented with one fresh pointer: rotate to the computational basis, copy to the pointer, rotate the surviving qubit back, and destroy the pointer. Its residual disturbance is exactly the declared Lüders instrument.

    The history encoder is the channel

    It can be obtained by retaining the actual source history and preparing its corresponding clock basis code. A coherent normal form

    has the same final destructive readout because . This equality is not permission to move a geometry update past a required intermediate record.

    The one-qubit witness of Theorem thm:residual-obstruction is another finite setting, with one coarse outcome and an -audit. It reads expectations and for the two ideal residuals.

    Neither finite encoder is an acquisition map from a continuum field or an unknown metric to the register. The payload is a finite instrument and a finite certificate table, not a finite-qubit field instrument.

  • sectionCalibration and dictionary nonuniquenessFinite clock, residual audit, and encoding limits › Calibration and dictionary nonuniqueness · lines 2016–2030
    Open as its own page

    Declare three maps separately:

    1. a clock calibration and, if desired, a history-event tag ;

    2. a rod map assigning surviving names to installed ports and developed spatial coordinates;

    3. a causal map embedding every actual scheduled dependency, including classical control, in the prescribed conical relation.

    The selected slice heights are a fourth named quantity and are not automatically the clock calibrations. In particular, two histories can select the same slice height.

  • propositionProposition: Clock limitsFinite clock, residual audit, and encoding limits › Calibration and dictionary nonuniqueness · VII-E-ST@1#prop:clocklimits · proof attached · lines 2031–2062
    Open as its own page

    The following hold:

    1. if the labels are distinct, exact calibration to one actual readout event,

      forces one deterministic code, or admits no normalized input when is not a label;

    2. has no universal left inverse;

    3. finite matrices cannot satisfy ;

    4. the instrument's records do not uniquely determine the geometric dictionary.

    Proof. Distinct labels allow at most one supported outcome and probabilities sum to one. For (ii), the clock states , with the same payload, have identical destructive outputs. For (iii), take the trace of the proposed commutator.

    For (iv), keep all finite matrices unchanged and relabel history times or rotate and translate the local rod frame. Small regular laboratories for different prescribed deficits can also carry the same finite instrument. The record law does not change.

  • sectionCalibration and dictionary nonuniquenessFinite clock, residual audit, and encoding limits › Calibration and dictionary nonuniqueness · lines 2062–2075
    Open as its own page

    The residual obstruction supplies a separate nonuniqueness: even with one dictionary fixed, compatible records can conceal different residual instruments. This is not, by itself, a proof of geometric nonuniqueness; the preceding independent relabeling construction provides that proof.

    A multi-outcome history reading at one fixed event is therefore not exact equality of all its distinct history labels with that event's coordinate. No clock-conditioned Schrödinger evolution is claimed without the extra hypotheses used in En09-A CheungClockLocality.

  • propositionProposition: Finite parameter compressionFinite clock, residual audit, and encoding limits › Finite compression and implementation bounds · VII-E-ST@1#prop:compressionlimit, VII-E-ST@1#eq:compression · proof attached · lines 2078–2117
    Open as its own page

    Fix the finite routing and geometric label dictionary. For active source instruments with , put

    Their complete one-step channels satisfy

    Thus finite numerical approximations to the matrix calibrations converge in complete channel norm on this fixed finite model. No uniform Lipschitz assertion at is made.

    Proof. The derivatives of the square-root diagonal entries of are bounded by . Also

    For contraction operators ,

    by expanding the difference into two terms, including after amplification. Sum over the two recorded branches and divide by two.

  • sectionFinite compression and implementation boundsFinite clock, residual audit, and encoding limits › Finite compression and implementation bounds · VII-E-ST@1#eq:telescoping · lines 2117–2146
    Open as its own page

    For compatible finite channel sequences, the same one-factor-at-a-time expansion gives

    Keeping history registers inside every comparison makes the bound apply to the entire history instrument.

    Conditional normalization is more delicate. If the complete history channels are within in half-diamond norm, a fixed unnormalized branch differs in trace norm by at most . For positive branch probabilities at least , the normalized conditional trace distance is at most , by adding and subtracting one unnormalized block divided by the other probability. There is no uniform conditional estimate across arbitrarily rare or zero-probability branches.

    Numerical compression does not replace an exact event guard. The reversible event rule continues to use the exact finite parameter word , not an approximate length report.

Typed locality, physical containment, and transport

  • sectionThe typed schedule boundTyped locality, physical containment, and transport › The typed schedule bound · lines 2151–2167
    Open as its own page

    Let a finite metric site set carry local finite quantum–classical algebras. At a prescribed layer, the complete channel factors over a partition , with . All control records read by a block belong to that block.

    For a terminal region , define

  • theoremTheorem: Typed schedule localityTyped locality, physical containment, and transport › The typed schedule bound · VII-E-ST@1#thm:locality-typed · proof attached · lines 2168–2189
    Open as its own page

    Every terminal observable on pulls back to an observable on , and

    Equal input reductions on the backward region, including any retained reference, give equal corresponding output reductions.

    Proof. A block disjoint from the current backward support acts on an identity factor. Its adjoint fixes that identity. A block meeting the support can enlarge it only within that block. Backward induction proves the support inclusion. Each added point is within one block diameter of an existing point; the triangle inequality proves the radius bound. Equality of all pulled-back expectations proves the reduction statement.

  • sectionThe typed schedule boundTyped locality, physical containment, and transport › The typed schedule bound · lines 2189–2201
    Open as its own page

    For feedback in one fixed envelope , replace the backward step by adjoining whenever it intersects the current set. The same proof applies only when contains every classical and quantum control actually inspected. A global controller cannot be omitted from these envelopes.

    The theorem is VII-E/VII-G's typed interface bound. It is not yet I-B's physical cone containment. In particular, the physical size of the four-face patch is not a certificate for .

  • theoremTheorem: Containment in the prescribed coneTyped locality, physical containment, and transport › The typed schedule bound · VII-E-ST@1#thm:locality-cone · proof attached · lines 2202–2224
    Open as its own page

    Suppose each actual input-output dependency edge of the complete finite network is assigned future-causal ports in . Then scheduled ancestors of a terminal port lie in its metric past.

    Operational intervention influence is contained in scheduled ancestry. Neither converse is asserted.

    Proof. Compose future-causal paths along any directed dependency path. Transitivity gives metric containment.

    An intervention outside the backward dependency region changes maps acting only on identity factors in every pulled-back terminal observable; its effect is zero. Conversely, a scheduled input to a replacement channel can be ignored by that channel, so ancestry need not imply influence. A metric-causal pair need not be connected by an installed network.

  • sectionThe typed schedule boundTyped locality, physical containment, and transport › The typed schedule bound · lines 2224–2235
    Open as its own page

    Thus three objects remain:

    The second inclusion requires the embedding. This is the distinction compared with VII-J, En03-A, and En05-A CheungTransport,CheungClockLocality.

  • sectionA target-adapted causal routeTyped locality, physical containment, and transport › A target-adapted causal route · lines 2236–2254
    Open as its own page

    Choose two regular spatial ports whose straight developed connecting segment lies in a convex part of the laboratory. Let its length be . Install sites

    each with an equal-dimensional payload register . Initialize in the same blank state .

    At hop , use the admitted communication channel that exchanges the contents of and over duration . Its two transfer directions have causal ports; it is not an instantaneous spatially extended gate.

  • theoremTheorem: Complete finite payload and record transportTyped locality, physical containment, and transport › A target-adapted causal route · VII-E-ST@1#thm:transport · proof attached · lines 2255–2287
    Open as its own page

    After hop , every initial payload-reference state has the form

    The logical channel is exactly the identity, including references, and arrival occurs at . All communication paths lie inside the supplied cone.

    A classical record can be forwarded on the same route. An operation conditioned on that record at the receiver is performed only after both record and payload arrive. The resulting complete recorded residual instrument is the declared one with its payload relocated.

    Proof. Each exchange transfers the whole payload factor and all of its reference correlations into the next blank factor. Induction proves the state identity. Every hop covers spatial distance in time , hence follows a null transfer path in the developed chart. Its pullback is causal.

    Apply the payload argument with the classical record included in the reference. Forward its jointly classical blocks by classical copying and causal communication. At the receiver the code selects the same conditional maps. No copying of an unknown quantum state is used.

  • sectionA target-adapted causal routeTyped locality, physical containment, and transport › A target-adapted causal route · lines 2287–2292
    Open as its own page

    The protocol assumes installed communication permissions. It is not a derivation of field propagation or an exact null-routing theorem on every endpoint of one fixed lattice.

  • propositionProposition: No zero-duration remote SWAPTyped locality, physical containment, and transport › A target-adapted causal route · VII-E-ST@1#prop:instant · proof attached · lines 2293–2305
    Open as its own page

    A remote identity transmission or SWAP between distinct simultaneous spatial ports is not an admitted zero-duration operation.

    Proof. Two orthogonal sender inputs give different receiver outputs. Thus the operation has intervention influence. Its simultaneous distinct endpoints are spacelike and cannot satisfy the causal dependency contract.

  • sectionOne explicit storage ledgerTyped locality, physical containment, and transport › One explicit storage ledger · lines 2307–2344
    Open as its own page

    For the two-step one-qubit model, with all route payload sites reserved in advance:

    Source pointers and audit pointers need not coexist with the two-qubit audit clock, so a sufficient quantum laboratory peak is , before any optional event-code carriers. A sufficient classical reserve is , with the sender controller and history included in its route code.

    If the reversible four-face code is also represented by live quantum carriers, add

    qubits while that circuit is live. Its retained history is not uncomputed. Spectator and external reference storage are charged separately.

    These are stated reserves, not optimality or thermodynamic claims. Local source gates and final audits have separately allocated positive durations. The departure time is after the necessary local preparation and clock readout.

Release, corrections, and unchanged analytical boundaries

  • theoremTheorem: VII-E-ST local Grade S releaseRelease, corrections, and unchanged analytical boundaries · VII-E-ST@1#thm:release · proof attached · lines 2349–2394
    Open as its own page

    For the supported presentation and finite permissions specified above:

    1. the observation contract has exact record and residual criteria, a robust residual obstruction, a sharp Lüders criterion, compatible continuations, restricted deferral, and its spectator theorem;

    2. the hybrid contract has a complete state-independent branch representation, an intrinsic observation criterion, history closure, its own spectator theorem, and the whole-quantum-input recovery obstruction;

    3. the four-face transverse family has explicit charts, edge laws, a compact collar, a supported -dimensional lift, an exact event guard, and a decoder-correct finite reversible implementation;

    4. the independent finite slice instrument has a certificate for every branch and changes no conical metric or worldsheet data;

    5. the two-step model has the equal-slice residual separation and exact coarse-record channel gap (eq:exact-gap);

    6. finite clock readout, residual audits, parameter compression, and reference-preserving causal transport are constructed on their stated finite interfaces.

    These satisfy Definition def:grade. Neither source contract is used as an unproved premise of the other. The general interface results do not depend on the four-face illustration.

    Proof. Theorems thm:pullback–thm:spectators-E give (i). Theorems thm:structure–thm:spectators-G, Theorem thm:decouple, and Corollary cor:informative give (ii).

    Theorem thm:certificate gives (iii). Theorem thm:finite-model gives (iv). Proposition prop:equal-slice and Theorem thm:coarse-gap give (v). Sections sec:clock–sec:locality give (vi). All five defining Grade S interfaces have been specified.

  • sectionScope corrections that matter mathematicallyRelease, corrections, and unchanged analytical boundaries › Scope corrections that matter mathematically · lines 2396–2440
    Open as its own page

    and residual. Record compatibility is an effect identity. Instrument compatibility is a selective-map identity. The one-qubit witness and the two-step example exhibit the difference on fully specified ideal targets.

    quantifiers. Branch closure gives a universal history theorem. It is stronger than agreement of one terminal marginal. No necessity assertion for accidental equality on a single prepared input is made.

    and spectators. Channel equalities are reference stable. Comparison of two different extended inputs requires their agreement on the appropriate reference-extended observation space. Spectator consistency compares an extension with its restriction and requires a blind complete controller.

    and dimension. The four-face construction is a transverse marking in a regular patch. Its compact lift was proved rather than inferred by dimensional relabeling. Its local junction, and the axial extension of that junction, are not . The fixed ambient conical metric is not generated by the marking's intrinsic angle defect.

    data and guards. The branch certificate is a finite specimen of a declared family. It is not a classification of all conical transitions. Finite numerical reports do not measure arbitrary exact real parameters. The discrete event guard remains exact on its declared finite code domain.

    and observable preservation. An informative record excludes exact recovery of every unknown quantum input on the full matrix algebra. It does not exclude a named effect, a classical sector, or an appropriately specified code from being preserved. The finite radiation decoder of En02-C is a separate task, not an input to this obstruction CheungComparisons.

  • sectionNamed comparisons that are not incorporatedRelease, corrections, and unchanged analytical boundaries › Named comparisons that are not incorporated · lines 2441–2485
    Open as its own page

    The supported-laboratory pattern is comparable with III-B and V-B; represented apparatus questions with IV and IV-B; finite-sample certificates with II and II-B; and clock, schedule, and transport questions with En09-A, En03-A, En05-A, and VII-J CheungComparisons,CheungClockLocality, CheungTransport. Their hypotheses are not silently imported.

    The following objects remain separate:

    • VII-A through VII-D and VII-I do not supply a quantum source instrument, product domain, sharp interacting observable, or algebra for the present model.

    • VII-H's free-scalar susceptibility is not this record, residual instrument, or inherited characteristic coefficient.

    • III's equation-space rows and its unconstructed sourced successor are not the direct-sum channel.

    • IX-A through IX-E, X-G, and XI-G are different interface or admission questions and are not repaired here.

    • VII-F's three-to-six particle event is not the four-face marking, not , and not a premise of the finite slice model. A readiness record cannot replace its exact guard.

    • VIII-B's packet family does not select the supplied deficit. VIII-C's promised source token is not an acquired expectation or a derived dynamical law.

    • Em02-E and XX-A's classical lapses, and XIX-A's clock prescriptions, are not geometric code labels or event-time readings.

    • En08-A's scheduler consistency does not select our cone. En08-B's null-boundary approximation is not the installed exact route proved above.

    • Oai282-A's finite local Ward residual has its own improvement data; it is neither this observation boundary nor a quantum Master Ward identity.

    • The OpenAI catalogue is not a premise or a verification. No family supplies the cone, hybrid channel, or clock. Family 265's static area-law question is not the exchange or a Page curve.

    • The supplied Hawk, Psy, and Em packet records are not identified with this observation package.

    These are documentary comparisons in the supplied source dossier CheungComparisons,AnalyticRecords.

  • sectionStanding analytical stopsRelease, corrections, and unchanged analytical boundaries › Standing analytical stops · lines 2486–2509
    Open as its own page

    This paper does not close the historical H2 requirement as stated in XIV-H. Its release must nevertheless distinguish that historical ending from XIV-I's constructed internal I2 amplitude. That internal construction is not the full characteristic map still missing at I3/J2 AnalyticRecords.

    No full characteristic map, joint remainder, transverse extension, contact compatibility theorem, or quantum coefficient is admitted here. The downstream quantum exit called XV-B is not opened. This does not deny the existence of technical manuscripts with that identifier.

    XVI-N is not discharged. Within the stated XVI-O prescription,

    \mathrm{O.1}=\texttt{\detokenize{NOT_CLOSED}}.

    Separately scoped results using enlarged prescriptions do not update that statement or admit the inherited insertion AnalyticRecords.

  • scopeStanding refusalsRelease, corrections, and unchanged analytical boundaries › Standing analytical stops · lines 2510–2526
    Open as its own page

    refusals{ Not spacetime emergence, Grade E, Einstein dynamics, a global conical Cauchy theorem, or an intrinsic cone field theory. Not a Page curve, island, interior, bounce, ultraviolet completion, or gravity-generated-entanglement test. Not quantized relational time without external scheduling.

    Record compatibility is not residual agreement. An informative classical record is not recovery of every quantum input. A nonconstant deterministic packet selection is not an unconditional affine channel. Matter-controlled slicing is not matter-driven gravitational dynamics.

    The geometric time axis remains after clock consumption. No quantum field coefficient, quantum Ward identity, or physical thermal implementation is supplied.}

Declarations

  • sectionDeclarationsDeclarations · lines 2529–2554
    Open as its own page

    . The author field is intentionally empty for anonymous review. Authorized authorship and affiliation metadata are required for a signed submission. VII-E's source author field is empty. Citation or registry attribution to N. Cheung does not assign authorship of this adaptation.

    and dependency scope. All positive claims released here have explicit finite-dimensional or local geometric proofs above. VII-E and VII-G are source records for the adapted contracts, not unprinted theorem premises. The supplied long characteristic-graph programme is a distinct unresolved programme, not a plan purportedly completed by this finite observation package.

    and implementation. No successful pdflatex execution, proof-assistant verification, independently executed symbolic or numerical calculation, physical circuit compilation, experiment, independent referee certification, or journal acceptance of this adaptation is asserted.

  • bibliographyReferencesDeclarations · lines 2555–2740
    Open as its own page

    DaviesLewis

    E. B. Davies and J. T. Lewis, “An operational approach to quantum probability,” Communications in Mathematical Physics 17 (1970), 239–260. DOI: 10.1007/BF01647093.

    Choi

    M.-D. Choi, “Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices,” Linear Algebra and its Applications 10 (1975), 285–290. DOI: 10.1016/0024-3795(75)90075-0.

    Watrous

    J. Watrous, The Theory of Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, 2018. Author's book interface: https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/ watrous/TQI/.

    CheungVIIE

    N. Cheung, Observation boundaries for destructive quantum readout and external geometry. Manuscript VII-E. -E.tex, version 1, Enter Calculus Companion, unpublished manuscript. The source author field is empty; attribution follows the companion's documentary record. Relevant locators include :pullback, :residual-obstruction, :luders, :composition, and :certificate. https://enter.grok.me/browse/VII-E.

    CheungVIIG

    N. Cheung, Landmark VII-G: Completely positive observation boundaries for finite matter–geometry feedback. -G.tex, version 1, Enter Calculus Companion, unpublished manuscript. Relevant locators include :structure, :observation, :histories, :decouple, :affine, and :finite-model. https://enter.grok.me/browse/VII-G.

    CheungEnter

    N. Cheung, “The Enter Calculus: A Linear Quantum Lambda Calculus with an Operational Characterization of Measurement,” Frontiers in Physics 14 (2026), article 1954943. Accepted 28 September 2026; the consulted publisher record identifies the final formatted version as forthcoming. DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2026.1954943.

    CheungI

    N. Cheung, Manuscript I. .tex, version 2, Enter Calculus Companion, supplied unpublished manuscript. The characterization theorem concerns its specified strategy class and five requirements. https://enter.grok.me/browse/I.

    CheungPhilosophy

    N. Cheung, The Philosophy of Enter: Destructive Readout, Quantum Recovery, and the Refusal of Identification. -v2.tex, version 2. Introductory essay, Enter Calculus Companion. https://enter.grok.me/enter.

    CheungIB

    N. Cheung, I-B-v1: A Finite Enter Spacetime: Calibrated Destructive Time Readout on a Prescribed Conical Product. -B-v1.tex, version 1. Enter Calculus Companion, unpublished manuscript. https://enter.grok.me/browse/I-B.

    GurevichBlass

    Y. Gurevich and A. Blass, “Quantum circuits with classical channels and the principle of deferred measurements,” Theoretical Computer Science 920 (2022), 21–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2022.02.002. https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.08324.

    KnillLaflamme

    E. Knill and R. Laflamme, “Theory of quantum error-correcting codes,” Physical Review A 55 (1997), 900–911. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.55.900. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9604034.

    KSW

    D. Kretschmann, D. Schlingemann, and R. F. Werner, “The information-disturbance tradeoff and the continuity of Stinespring's representation,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 54 (2008), 1708–1717. DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2008.917696. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0605009.

    DJH

    S. Deser, R. Jackiw, and G. 't Hooft, “Three-dimensional Einstein gravity: Dynamics of flat space,” Annals of Physics 152 (1984), 220–235. DOI: 10.1016/0003-4916(84)90085-X. Context for conical and polygonal descriptions only; no -dimensional source equation is imported.

    CheungPackets

    N. Cheung, VIII-B, -B-v3.tex, version 3; and VIII-C, -C-v3.tex, version 3. Enter Calculus Companion, supplied unpublished source records. Variable-deficit packet dictionaries, deterministic Option N, and promised source tokens are separate contracts. https://enter.grok.me/browse/VIII-B; https://enter.grok.me/browse/VIII-C.

    CheungTransport

    N. Cheung, Manuscript VII-J. -J.tex, version 1. Enter Calculus Companion, supplied unpublished manuscript. Scheduled reachability, intervention influence, and physical causal containment are separately specified. https://enter.grok.me/browse/VII-J.

    CheungClockLocality

    N. Cheung, En09-A, 09-A.tex, version 1; En03-A, 03-A.tex, version 1; and En05-A, 05-A.tex, version 1. Enter Calculus Companion, supplied unpublished source records. Clock conditioning and complete-channel schedule locality are comparisons, not premises. https://enter.grok.me/browse/En09-A; https://enter.grok.me/browse/En03-A; https://enter.grok.me/browse/En05-A.

    CheungComparisons

    N. Cheung, Enter Calculus Companion: version-specific documentary records supplied with this problem. This grouped entry identifies the supplied comparisons: I, II, II-B, III, III-B, IV, IV-B, V-B; VII-A through VII-D, VII-F, VII-H, VII-I; VIII-A through VIII-C; IX-A through IX-E, X-G, XI-G; Em02-E, XX-A, XIX-A, En02-C, En08-A, En08-B, Oai282-A, and the named Hawk, Psy, and Em packet records. Grouping is bibliographic only and implies no common model, theorem transfer, or independent verification. https://enter.grok.me/browse.

    The separately supplied OpenAI catalogue is attributed to OpenAI, not to N. Cheung. It is not a premise; no family proof or formalization claim is verified or imported.

    AnalyticRecords

    N. Cheung, XIV-H, version 1; XIV-I, version 1; XIV-J, version 1; technical XV-B, version 2; XVI-N, revision r12; XVI-O, revision o70-sync; and the separately scoped XVI-Q, release Q11. Enter Calculus Companion, supplied unpublished source records. Historical H2, constructed internal I2, unresolved full I3/J2, and prescription-specific O.1 statements are distinct. https://enter.grok.me/browse/XIV-H; https://enter.grok.me/browse/XIV-I; https://enter.grok.me/browse/XIV-J; https://enter.grok.me/browse/XVI-O.